Spontaneous abortions and missed miscarriage in a public hospital

maternal and sociodemographic profile*

Authors

Keywords:

Women, Maternal Age, Abortion, Spontaneous, Abortion, Missed, Socioeconomic Factors

Abstract

Objective: Analyze the influence of socio-demographic and maternal factors on the occurrence of spontaneous and missed miscarriage.

Method: A descriptive epidemiological study that analyzed socio-demographic, obstetric, and nursing variables for the period 2019-2024, collected in electronic records of a hospital in the northwest of Paraná, and analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test.

Results: Of the 436 cases, predominance was identified until the 12th week of pregnancy (82.2% of missed miscarriage and 67.7% of spontaneous abortions). Abortions were significantly more prevalent in women with up to eight years of study and those with higher educational levels. Adolescents and women aged 35 or older were more vulnerable to missed miscarriage, while those aged 16 to 34 were more vulnerable to spontaneous abortion.

Conclusion: Maternal age and schooling influence the types of abortion, evidencing sociodemographic inequalities that permeate the reproductive process. Public policies that broaden access and qualify reproductive care in the Single Health System are necessary.

Author Biographies

Mariana Enumo Balestre, State University of Maringá (UEM). Maringá, PR, Brazil

Nurse. Graduated in Nursing from the Postgraduate Program in Nursing at the State University of Maringá (UEM). Maringá, PR, Brazil

Gabriel Pavinati, State University of Maringá, PR, Brazil

Nurse. PhD in Nursing. State University of Maringá, PR, Brazil

André Inácio da Silva, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

Nurse. Master's degree in Public Health, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

Vitória Vasconcelos Logullo, State University of Maringá (UEM). Maringá, PR, Brazil.

Nurse. Master's student in Nursing at the Postgraduate Program in Nursing at the State University of Maringá (UEM). Maringá, PR, Brazil.

Elen Ferraz Teston, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.

Nurse. PhD in Nursing. Professor at the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.

João Carlos Garcia de Almeida, State University of Maringá, PR, Brazil.

Nurse. State University of Maringá, PR, Brazil.

Sonia Silva Marcon, State University of Maringá, PR, Brazil.

Nurse. PhD in Nursing. Professor in the Department of Nursing at the State University of Maringá, PR, Brazil.

References

1. Mohammad-Akbari A, Mohazzab A, Tavakoli M, Karimi A, Zafardoust S, Zolghadri Z, et al. The effect of low-molecular-weight heparin on live birth rate of patients with unexplained early recurrent pregnancy loss: A two-arm randomized clinical trial. J Res Med Sci [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jan 20];27(1):1-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_81_21

2. Naeam FK, Shahid AH, Burhan ZA. Risk factors for missed abortion for women at childbearing age thi-qar province-Iraq. Ginekol Poloz [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jan 20];19(2):1-5 Available from: https://www.ginekologiaipoloznictwo.com/articles/risk-factors-for-missed-abortion-for-women-at-childbearing-age-thiqar-provinceiraq-109609.html

3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas e Estratégicas. Gestação de alto risco: manual técnico [Internet]. 5. ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012. [cited 2025 Jan 20]. 302 p. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/gestacao_alto_risco.pdf

4. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO). Protocolo de Assistência Assistencial em Obstetrícia. Aborto: classificação, diagnóstico e conduta [Internet]. São Paulo: FEBRASGO; 2018 [cited 2025 Jan 20];21. 18 p. Available from: https://www.febrasgo.org.br/images/pec/Protocolos-assistenciais/Protocolos-assistenciais-obstetricia.pdf/Aborto-Classificao-diagnstico-e-conduta.pdf

5. Mendes LMC, de Oliveira LL, Silva JV, Meneses AP, Duarte MSM. Potentially life-threatening conditions determinants in pregnancy-puerperal cycle. Ciênc Cuid Saúde [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jan 20];21:e57258. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v21i0.57258

6. Jiang, WZ., Yang, XL. & Luo, JR. Risk factors for missed abortion: retrospective analysis of a single institution’s experience. Reprod Biol Endocrinol [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jan 20];20(115):1-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00987-2

7. Oliveira MTS, Oliveira CNT, Marques LM, Souza CL, Oliveira MV. Factors associated with spontaneous abortion: a systematic review. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jan 20];20(2):361-72. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042020000200003

8. de Souza Júnior EV, Nunes GA, de Jesus MAS, Cruz DP, Boery RNSO, Boery EN. Hospitalizations and hospital costs for spontaneous abortion in Bahia, Brazil. Rev Pesqui (Univ Fed Estado Rio J, Online) [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Jan 20];12:767-73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.rpcfo.v12.7156

9. Costa M, Grazina A, Cavaco C, Santos AP, Tavares M. The influence of miscarriage on womens´s mental health: scoping review. Rev Millenium [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jan 20];2(ed.espec nº18),e34948. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0218e.34948

10. Soares RB, Melo AT, Cavaco JP, Faria M. Aborto espontâneo e luto gestacional -valorizar e gerir: um relato de caso. Rev Port Med Geral Fam [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jan 20];40(5):531-3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i5.14123

11. Bonan C, dos Reis AP, Rodrigues AP, Menezes GMS, McCallum CA, Duarte NIG, et al. Health care itineraries for women in situations of abortion: methodological aspects of a qualitative study for Birth in Brazil II survey. Cad Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jan 20];40(4):e00006223. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11057479/

12. Agência Estadual de Notícias (Governo do Estado do Paraná). Censo 2022: proporção de pretos e pardos cresce no Paraná e chega a 34,3% [Internet]. Curitiba: Governo do Estado do Paraná; 22 Dec 2023 [cited 2025 Jan 23]. [about 3 screens]. Available from: https://www.aen.pr.gov.br/Noticia/Censo-2022-proporcao-de-pretos-e-pardos-cresce-no-Parana-e-chega-343

13. do Nascimento MI, de Sousa ASC, Leão CN, de Lira DC, do Nascimento JLS, de Carvalho MJ, et al. Tendências de hospitalizações por aborto no Sistema Único de Saúde, segundo a cor da pele (2012-2021). J Health NPEPS [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 15];9(2):e13052. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30681/2526101013052

14. Quenby S, Gallos ID, Dhillon-Smith RK, Podesek M, Stephenson MD, Fisher J, et al. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. The Lancet [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Jan 20];397(10285):1658-67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6

15. Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento. atlas do desenvolvimento humano no Brasil: Ranking [Internet]. Brasília: PNUD; [cited 2025 Sep 16]. Available from: http://www.atlasbrasil.org.br/ranking

16. Saavedra-Avendano B, Schiavon R, Darney BG. Relationship Between Abortion at First Pregnancy and Live Births by Young Adulthood: A Population-Based Study Among Mexican Women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Jan 20];34(4):552-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2021.01.007

17. Gong G, Yin C, Huang Y, Yang Y, Hu T, Zhu Z, et al. A survey of influencing factors of missed abortion during the two-child peak period. J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jan 20];41(6),977–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2020.1821616

18. da Silva PA, de Oliveira HCH, Santello AP, Balieiro FC, Siqueira GS, Ferrarezi JG, et al. Características epidemiológicas e obstétricas de mulheres com abortamento recorrente e fatores de risco. Arq Ciênc Saúde UNIPAR [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jan 20];28(2):48-62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25110/arqsaude.v28i2.2024-10920

19. Martins PL, Menezes RA. Gestação em idade avançada e aconselhamento genético: um estudo em torno das concepções de risco. Physis [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 jan. 20];32(2):e320218. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312022320218

20. Abrantes PG, Santos MM da S, Castañon MCMN, Leite FFC. Caracterização das alterações histopatológicas das perdas gestacionais detectadas em um serviço de anatomia patológica de referência. Rev Med Minas Gerais [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 15];34:e34109. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5935/2238-3182.2024e34109-en

21. Giotta M, Bartolomeo N, Trerotoli PA retrospective observational study using administrative databases to assess the risk of spontaneous abortions related to environmental and socioeconomic conditions. Life-Basel [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Jan 20];13(9):1853. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/life13091853

22. Fang J, Xie B, Chen B, Qiao C, Zheng B, Luan X, et al. Biochemical clinical factors associated with missed abortion independent of maternal age. Medicine [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Jan 20];97(50):e13573. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013573

23. Malavé-Malavé M. Gravidez tardia: desafios e perspectivas. Instituto Fernandes Figueira - Fiocruz [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jan 21]. [about 7 screens]. Avaible from: https://www.iff.fiocruz.br/index.php/pt/?view=article&id=230:gravidez-tardia-2022&catid=8

24. Malpica-Cárdenas PA, Florez Peñaloza IX, Martínez-Torres J, Medina NAZ, Lee-Osorno BI, Laguado MFJ. Aborto espontáneo en estudiantes universitarias en Pamplona, Norte de Santander, en el periodo del año 2007 al 2016. un estudio transversal. Rev Investig Salud Univ Boyacá [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Jan 20];8(2):32-43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24267/23897325.602

25. Rubio-Schweizer G, Caro-Elgueta M, Witker-Jiménez D, de La-Cruz NP, Tona-Castellanos V. Atención a mujeres en situación de aborto en el Hospital San José (2016-2019). Rev Chi Obstet Ginecol [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Jan 20];86(2):202-209. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75262021000200202

26. Uliana MD, Marin DFD, da Silva MB, Giugliani C, Iser BPM. Hospitalization due to abortion in Brazil, 2008-2018: an ecological time-series study. Epidemiol Serv Saúde [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Aug 20];31(1):e2021341. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-49742022000100017

27. Zhang H, Yan J. Environment and Female Reproductive Health. 1st ed. 2021. Singapore: Springer Singapore [Internet].2021 [cited 2025 Jan 20]. XI, 313 p. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4187-6

28. Lopes MC de L, de Oliveira RR, da Silva M de AP, Padovani C, de Oliveira NLB, Higarashi IH. Temporal trend and factors associated to teenage pregnancy. Rev Esc Enferm USP [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jan 20];54:e03639. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2019020403639

29. Gluck O, Barber E, Friedman M, Feldstein O, Tal O, Grinstein E, et al. Failure rate of medical treatment for miscarriage correlated with the difference between gestational age according to last menstrual period and gestational size calculated via ultrasound. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Jan 20];12(19):6112. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196112

30. Diniz D, Medeiros M, Madeiro A. National Abortion Survey - Brazil, 2021. Ciênc Saúde Colet [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Jan 20];28(6):1601-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232023286.01892023

Published

2026-03-18

How to Cite

Balestre, M. E., Pavinati, G., da Silva, A. I., Logullo, V. V., Teston, E. F., de Almeida, J. C. G., & Marcon, S. S. (2026). Spontaneous abortions and missed miscarriage in a public hospital: maternal and sociodemographic profile*. Cogitare Enfermagem, 31. Retrieved from https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/100981

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE