Analysis of programs of payment for environmental services in southern Brazil: identifying strategies for the conservation of Araucaria angustifolia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v50i0.60495Keywords:
PES, Araucaria, conservation, indicators, typologiesAbstract
Brazilian’s conservation strategies are not limited only by the creation of Protected Areas, either Integral Protection or Sustainable Use. There are distinct strategies that aim to value services provided by ecosystems, combining conservation to the access of environmental services provided by biodiversity. In this context, there are the Payments for Environmental Services (PES). Throughout the Mixed Ombrophilous Forest (MOF), the plant species Araucaria angustifolia, known as Pinheiro-do-Paraná, is as threatened as the MOF ecosystem itself. Consequently, PES programs appear as an alternative tool to the main strategies for the preservation and conservation of biodiversity. In order to evaluate the PES programs created at the MOF that contribute to the species’ conservation, we evaluated four PES projects in southern Brazil: “Desmatamento Evitado”, “Araucária+”, “Corredor Ecológico Chapecó” and “Estrada com Araucárias”, all of them distributed in Paraná and Santa Catarina states. The basis for the programs’ selection was a literature review. Once we selected them, we identified the indicators and topologies of each one, as well as an index indicating positive and negative points between the selected PES programs. The results showed that the selected PES have broad objectives, which value differently the indicators of additionality, permanence, transaction, but showed little evidence to the spillover indicator. The mostly contemplated typologies are support and regulation. Cultural services typology could be contemplated more frequently, for instance. Finally, by analyzing these four programs, despite few indicators and typologies that involve a PES, there are different possibilities that align conservation and valuation of biodiversity positively, since the programs have different methodologies, scopes, and objectives in general.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

