Relation of Evidence of Corporate Risk Management with Organizational Performance and Share Valuation of Brazilian Companies with ADRs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rcc.v16i1.91327Keywords:
Corporate Risk Management.Disclosure.Disclosure.Performance.Value creation.Abstract
Corporate risk management (GRC) is increasingly gaining prominence in the academic and corporate world, being placed as an important support for the creation of value for companies. This research aims to analyze the relationship between corporate risk management and organizational performance and the valuation of shares in Brazilian companies issuing American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). The method based on the framework proposed by COSO ERM, in the version updated in 2017, was used. It is a descriptive research, using both a qualitative approach, through content and document analysis to identify the disclosure of the GRC, as well as quantitative, using an econometric model with panel data with fixed effects, which tested the defined hypotheses. Regarding disclosure, the companies showed an evolution between the years 2017 and 2018, there is, however, room for improvement. The results validated the defined hypotheses, which claim that there is a positive relationship between the disclosure, in the annual reports, of corporate risk management with organizational performance and with the valuation of the company's shares. This study contributes to reinforce the importance of corporate risk management as a tool in the generation and maintenance of company value.References
Agarwal, R., & Kallapur, S. (2018). Cognitive risk culture and advanced roles of actors in risk governance: a case study. The Journal of Risk Finance.
Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Palermo, T. (2017). The dynamics of (dis)integrated risk management: A comparative field study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1-17.
Assaf Neto, A. (2019). Valuation: métricas de valor & avaliação de empresas. São Paulo: Atlas.
Bardin, L. (2004). Análise de Conteúdo. São Paulo: Editora 70.
Baxter, R., Hoitash, R., & Yezegel, A. (2013). Enterprise Risk Management Program Quality: Determinants, Value Relevance, and the Financial Crisis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30, 1264-1295.
Beasley, M. S., Branson, B. C., & Hancock, B. V. (2019). The State of Risk Oversight: An Overview of Enterprise Risk Management Practices. Raleigh: AICPA/ERM Initiative.
Bromiley, P., Mcshane, M., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2015). Enterprise Risk Management: Review, Critique, and Research Directions. Long Range Planning, 265-276.
Celona, J., Driver, J., & Hall, E. (2011). Value‐driven ERM: Making ERM an engine for simultaneous value creation and value protection. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 30(4), 15-33.
Callahan, C., & Soileau, J. (2017). Does Enterprise risk management enhance operating performance? Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 1-18.
Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2017). Enterprise Risk Management and the Financial Reporting Process: The Experiences of Audit Committee Members, CFOs, and External Auditors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34, 1178-1209.
COSO. (2004). Enterprise Risk Management - Integrated Framework. New York: AICPA.
COSO. (2017). Enterprise Risk Management - Integrating with Strategy and Performance: Executive Summary, Framework and Appendices. New York: COSO.
Damodaran, A. (2017). Valuation: Como Avaliar Empresas e Escolher as Melhores Ações. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.
Degenhart, L. e. (2016). Relação entre presença de comitê de gestão de risco e desempenho econômico em empresas brasileiras. Revista de Gestão dos Países de Língua Portuguesa, 4-21.
Dias, A. P. (2017). ¿Auditoría más efectiva después de COSO ERM 2017 o de ISO 31000:2009? Perspectiva Empresarial, 4, 71-80.
Dickinson, G. (2001). Enterprise Risk Management: Its Origins and Conceptual Foundation. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 360-366.
Durst, S., Hinteregger, C., & Zieba, M. (2019). The linkage between knowledge risk management and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 105, 1-10.
Ertugrul, M., Lei, J., Qiu, J., & Wan, C. (2017). Annual Report Readability, Tone Ambiguity, and the Cost of Borrowing. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52, 811-836.
Fernandes, F. C., Silva, M., & Santos, F. T. (2008). Informações sobre Gestão de Riscos nas Ians das Empresas Listadas no Novo Mercado da Bovespa. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade, 2, 36-55.
Filzen, J. J. (2015). The Information Content of Risk Factor Disclosures in Quarterly Reports. Accounting Horizons, 29, 887-916.
Florio, C., & Leoni, G. (2017). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case. The British Accounting Review, 49, 56-74.
Gatzert, N., & Martin, M. (2015). Determinants and Value of Enterprise Risk Management: Empirical Evidence from the Literature. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 18, 29-53.
Gordon, L., Loeb, M., & Tseng, C. (2009). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective. Account. Public Policy, 28, 301-327.
Gujarati, D. N. (2011). Econometria básica. Porto Alegre: AMGH.
Hayne, C., & Free, C. (2014). Hybridized professional groups and institutional work: COSO and the rise of enterprise risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39, 309-330.
Heinle, M. S., & Smith, K. C. (2017). A theory of risk disclosure. Review of Accounting Studies, 22, 1459-1491.
Horney, N., Pasmore, B., & O'Shea, T. (2010). Leadership agility: A business imperative for a VUCA world. Human Resource Planning, 33(4), 34.
Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The Value of Enterprise Risk Management. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78, 795-822.
IBGC. (2017). Gerenciamento de riscos corporativos: evolução em governança e estratégia. São Paulo: IBGC.
Jacomossi, F. A., Lunardi, M. A., & Silva, M. Z. (2020). Enterprise Risk Management e o Desempenho Empresarial: uma perspectiva contingencial. Revista Mineira De Contabilidade, 20(3), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.21714/2446-9114RMC2019v20n3t04 (Original work published 20º de dezembro de 2019)
Kaplan, R., & Mikes, A. (2012). Managing Risks: A New Framework. Harvard Business Review, 48-60.
Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (2008). A Execução Premium. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
Lopes, I. F., Beuren , I. M., & Vicente, E. F. R. (2021). Associação da Evidenciação do Gerenciamento de Riscos com Governança Corporativa e Desempenho em Empresas com ADRs. Revista Evidenciação Contábil & Finanças, 9(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2318-1001.2021v9n1.52215
Lundqvist, S. A. (2014). An Exploratory Study of Enterprise Risk Management: Pillars of ERM. Journal of Accounting,Auditing & Finance, 393-429.
Magro, C. B., Filipin, R., & Fernandes, F. C. (2015). Gestão de Riscos: Análise da Evidenciação de Riscos nas Concessionárias de Rodovias Listadas na Bovespa com Base na Metodologia COSO. ConTexto, 15, 57-75.
Mcshane, M. K., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2011). Does Enterprise Risk Management Increase Firm Value? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 641-658.
Ping, T., & Muthuveloo, R. (2015). The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on Firm Performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 11, 149-159.
Pinheiro, A. B., Sampaio, T. S. L., Rodrigues, R. C., & Batistella, A. J. (2022). Democracy, corruption and civil liberties: Does national context influence corporate carbon disclosure?. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 15, 434-452
Pinheiro, A. B., Panza, G. B., Berhorst, N. L., Toaldo, A. M. M., & Segatto, A. P. (2023). Exploring the relationship among ESG, innovation, and economic and financial performance: evidence from the energy sector. International Journal of Energy Sector Management.
Porter, M. (1996). What is Strategy, Harvard Business Review, November-December.
Quon, T. K., Zeghal, D., & Maingot, M. (2012). Enterprise risk management and firm performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 263-267.
Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice. Journal of Management, 35, 718-804.
Rochette, M. (2009). From risk management to ERM. Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 2, 394-408.
Roychowdhury, S., Shroff, N., & Verdi, R. (2018). The Effects of Financial Reporting and Disclosure on Corporate Investment: A Review. Work Paper. Boston College.
Santos, J. G., & Coelho, A. C. (2018). Value-relevance do disclosure: fatores e gestão de riscos em firmas brasileiras. Revista de Contabilidade e Finanças - USP, 29, 390-404.
Shubik, M. (1954). Information, Risk, Ignorance, and Indeterminacy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68, 629-640.
Silva, J. R., Silva, A. F., & Chan, B. L. (2019). Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Value: Evidence from Brazil. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 687-703.
Trautman, L., & Kimbell, J. (2018). Bribery and Corruption: The Coso Framework, FCPA, and U.K. Bribery Act. Florida Journal of International Law, 30, 191-246.
Verrecchia, R. (2001). Essays on Disclosure. Accounting Papers. University of Pennsylvania.
Vieira, S. (2019). Fundamentos de estatística. São Paulo: Atlas.
Viscelli, T. R., Hermanson, D. R., & Beasley, M. S. (2017). The Integration of ERM and Strategy: Implications for Corporate Governance. Accounting Horizons, 31, 69-82.
Zonatto, V. C., & Beuren, I. M. (2012). Evidenciação das Características Básicas Recomendadas pelo COSO (2004) para a Gestão de Riscos em Ambientes de Controle no Relatório da Administração de Empresas Brasileiras com ADRs. Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 77-98.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Contabilidade e Controladoria - RC&C
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in RC&C. Journal of Accounting and Management Control are subject to the following terms:
1.1. RC&C. Journal of Accounting and Management Control, through the Graduate Program in Accounting of the Department of Accounting – Sector of Applied Social Sciences – Federal University of Paraná, retains the ownership rights (copyright) of the published works and encourages and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), so that they may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted, and publicly displayed, provided that:
1.1.a. The authorship and original source of publication (journal, publisher, URL, and article DOI) are properly cited.
1.1.b. They are not used for commercial or profit-making purposes.
1.1.c. The existence and specifications of this license are mentioned.
1.2. Each article published will be assigned a Digital Object Identifier (DOI).
