Elements for discussion on social participation in closing of dumpsites: the case of Controlled Landfill of Jockey in the Federal District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v63i0.86125Keywords:
participatory processes, closing dumpsite, public policies, sustainable development.Abstract
Social participation is seen as one of the solutions to democratize decision-making and improve the projects, programs, plans, and policies proposed by governments. It is no different in the environmental field. In Brazilian waste management, social participation is one of the topics established in the Brazilian National Solid Waste Policy. In this sense, this article aims to analyze the quality of the participation of the actors involved, as well as the level, forms, and conditions of their participation, as well as the representation of the private sector, and the ability of the actors to influence decision-making in the process of closing the activities of the Controlled Landfill of Jockey (CLJ). This article is a case study conducted through semi-structured interviews with eight participants, representatives of different sectors, who participated directly or indirectly in the closing activities of the CLJ. Bibliographic and documentary research was also used. Results show that there was a significant role among the government but also among waste pickers, and the forms of participation reported are differentiated. However, there is low participation of the private sector and residents of the Cidade Estrutural. It is also evident the discredit to the closure of the CLJ. A highlight regards participation: it has controversies, such as low power of influence, manipulation, exclusion of crucial actors, and discredit in the participatory process. There is also a worrying lack of participation because dumpsite closures focus mainly on poorer layers of society, and the participation employed was not able to break with social exclusion and unequal relations of power. However, there are important advances because participation was weakened on other occasions.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

