The social technology PAIS (Integrated and Sustainable Agroecological Production) and its effectiveness on rural development in the semiarid: the case the of APAOrgani

Authors

  • Danessa Rafaella da Silva Universidade Federal de São Carlos- UFSCar / Programa de Pós Graduação em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural- PPGADR
  • Adriana Estela Sanjuan Montebello Universidade Federal de São Carlos- UFSCar / Programa de Pós Graduação em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural- PPGADR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v55i0.73792

Keywords:

family farming, environment, association, sustainable

Abstract

This research was developed in the Sertão de Alagoas, between July 2018 and March 2019, where a group of farmers members of the Producers in Agroecology Association - APAOrgânico, located in the municipality of Pão de Açúcar-AL, was studied. The Association has 29 members, but only 22 of them are active in production into the association. Thus, this study aims to verify the role of social technology PAIS to Producers in Agroecology Association – APAOrgânico, in promoting rural developments in the semiarid region. The chosen methodology was a case study, with an exploratory view configured as qualitative and quantitative (through the application of semi-structured forms with 11 farmers, survey and systematization of secondary data on the theme addressed and also reports about the interviewed farmers). In general, in Pão de Açúcar-AL, 730 people were attended with social technologies (water to drink). It is noticeable, then, that the strengthening of farmers through APAOrgânico has been important in the scenario of sustainable rural development as well as for living with the semiarid region. PAIS technology was responsible for enabling access to technologies facilitated adaptation so that agroecological production was possible, such as mandala production. Without PAIS technology, many farmers would not have the means to produce, as they would not have the tools to capture rainwater neither to capture water from the river for irrigation. Regarding the difference between agroecological and conventional products, 36.36% of farmers reported that quality is the main difference; followed by 27.27% who pointed out price and quality and 27.27% answered others. This is perceived because 54.55% of the interviewed people have already used some type of pesticide while 45.45% have never used it.

Author Biographies

Danessa Rafaella da Silva, Universidade Federal de São Carlos- UFSCar / Programa de Pós Graduação em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural- PPGADR

Doutoranda no Programa de Pós Graduação em Desenvolvimento Rural pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande Sul -UFRGS. Mestra em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural pelo PPGADR da Universidade Federal de São Carlos- UFScar com ênfase em Políticas Públicas. Graduação em Ciências Econômicas pela Universidade Federal de Alagoas/Sertão (2017), atuando nos principais temas: Políticas Públicas, Agricultura Familiar, Agroecologia, Convivência com o Semiárido e Desenvolvimento Rural.

Adriana Estela Sanjuan Montebello, Universidade Federal de São Carlos- UFSCar / Programa de Pós Graduação em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural- PPGADR

possui graduação em Ciências Econômicas pela Universidade de São Paulo (2004), mestrado em Economia Aplicada pela Universidade de São Paulo (2006), Doutorado em Economia Aplicada pela Universidade de São Paulo (2010) e Pós-Doutorado pela Universidade de São Paulo (2011-2012). É Professora da Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Campus de Araras, Departamento de Tecnologia Agroindustrial e Socioeconomia Rural. Tem experiência na área de Economia, com ênfase em Teoria Econômica, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: políticas agrícolas, organização de complexos agroindustriais, desenvolvimento sustentável e mercado de produtos florestais.

Published

2020-12-17

How to Cite

Silva, D. R. da, & Montebello, A. E. S. (2020). The social technology PAIS (Integrated and Sustainable Agroecological Production) and its effectiveness on rural development in the semiarid: the case the of APAOrgani. Desenvolvimento E Meio Ambiente, 55. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v55i0.73792

Issue

Section

Society and environment in the Semiárido: controversies and approaches