Public policies and cartography of the traditional communities territory’s on the coast of São Paulo and southern Rio de Janeiro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v63i0.92237Keywords:
traditional communities, territorial conflicts, cartographic representations, public policy, coast.Abstract
Official maps play a relevant role as representations of reality with specific objectives and, generally, favor hegemonic social actors. In contrast, researchers and communities have mapped elements of community interests, supporting the fight for their socio-territorial rights, as occurs in territories of traditional communities on the coast of São Paulo and south of Rio de Janeiro. This paper compares processes of spatial representation of these communities in nine official instruments of public territorial management and in two databases of partners of traditional communities in order to analyze the relationship between the representation of these communities and the incidence of public policy. Analysis parameters were defined to identify convergences and divergences between the materials: presence and absence of information; level of detail; way of characterizing communities. In official mappings, these communities are made invisible. Map maded by Laplan/Unesp shows 72 communities, against 23 of maps linked to public policies of the state of São Paulo, for the same territory. Map of Angra dos Reis and Paraty/RJ, prepared by Fiocruz/FCT, brings 82 communities, while official maps of the state of RJ present 42. Official maps highlight conservation units and urban and tourism activities and do not prioritize activities of traditional communities, subordinating traditional uses to the preservation of nature and the reproduction of capital. In practice, this leads to, the prohibition of activities that are essential for social reproduction, the criminalization of these communities and their disregard in the elaboration of public policies. Environmental policies and development vectors associated with the reproduction of capital are defined without considering the rights of these communities, which leads to sociocultural mischaracterization and the expulsion of community members from their territories, generating a worsening the socio-environmental situation.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.