Spring restoration and environmental (in)justice: The case of rural producers in Galiléia/MG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v62i0.83369Keywords:
springs, socioenvironmental conflicts, environmental injustice, power asymmetryAbstract
The current article considers in a particular way the spring restoration process in Renova's Program 27 implemented in Galiléia, as part of fulfilling the Conduct Adjustment Transactional Term (CAAT) signed in March 2016, four months after the disaster resulting from collapse of the Fundão dam in Mariana/MG. The paper aimed at evidencing the conflicts present in the dynamics of the territorialities established in P27 by rural producers, the Prosecutor's Office and Renova. To this end, we used spring restoration in the municipality of Galiléia/MG as framework. Through a literature review, as well as documentary analysis of the CAAT that established P27, we identified and analyzed the main actors and natural agents present in spring restoration in the program, performing a synthetic and global analysis of the conflict. All of the aforementioned under the historical, geographical and environmental contexts of the territory, against the background of environmental injustice. From this study, we understand that implementation of the program gathers diverse actors, who have different types of relationship and interests with the springs and marked power asymmetries. These power disparities of the actors involved and the discourse and the legal modality used to manage the issue act in favor of the companies and neglect the rights of the rural producers that joined the program, as well as of the entire population affected. In this scenario, there is certain repetition of socioenvironmental injustice patterns that date back from colonialism and are perpetuated to the present day.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.







.png)




