From naturalist to militant: the trajectory of Rachel Carson
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v56i0.70431Keywords:
Rachel Carson, silent spring, criticism, contemporary environmentalism, principles of environmental lawAbstract
This article, a synthesis of bibliographical and documentary research, restores the trajectory of Rachel Carson, biologist, writer, and icon of contemporary environmentalism. Initially, it deals with her personal life, especially with the burdens and familiar circumstances that conditioned her academic formation and her professional choices. Then, it presents the rise of Carson as a writer dedicated to scientific dissemination and the success obtained through a famous trilogy on the ocean. After the article discusses the historical context and the circumstances that led to the creation of Silent Spring, its main arguments, the marketing strategies used for its publication, and the international repercussions brought about by the work. Finally, it presents the criticisms directed against her book on pesticides.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.







.png)




