Traditional knowledge and challenges for the knowledges dialogue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v50i0.65438Keywords:
traditional knowledge, indigenous struggles, recognition of rights, dialogue of knowledge, Latin AmericaAbstract
The systems of knowledge of the indigenous peoples of Latin America or traditional knowledge have been denominated as: popular wisdom, local knowledge, folklore, indigenous science (De Gortari, 1963), science of the concrete (Lévi-Strauss, 1972), indigenous science and sciences natives (Cardona, 1979), popular knowledge, science of the people (Fals Borda, 1981; 1988); peasant knowledge (Toledo, 1994) ethno-knowledge, systems of indigenous and peasant knowledge (Leff et al., 2002); traditional ecological knowledge (Johnson 1992), and local and indigenous knowledge systems (LINKS, 2005), among other ways. In all cases, their nomination has been associated with the asymmetric interaction between these knowledge and the hegemonic, political, legal and academic spheres that identify and categorize them. At present, this interaction takes place under multiple tensions, among which the following stand out: 1) The recognition of indigenous peoples and their knowledge systems in the legal frameworks of the Latin American nation states; 2) The recognition of traditional knowledge in international instruments and 3) The acceptance, appropriation or rejection of these knowledge systems by research groups of companies, universities and research centers. The objective of this work is to present these tensions and in that context reflect on the dialogue of knowledge, as a possible option to generate an interaction of respect and symmetry between actors with different knowledge systems. Understanding the dialogue of knowledge, as a reflective praxis that aims to build respectful and non-asymmetric scenarios for such interaction. These knowledges and practices have been conserved, reproduced and innovated by the indigenous, afro-descendant and peasant peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean, through multiple methods and procedures, as we have emphasized in previous publications (Argueta Villamar, 2010; 2011; 2012; Pérez Ruiz, 1983; 2018; Pérez Ruiz & Argueta Villamar, 2011).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

