Territorialities of convincentiality and feeling-think whit traditional community forests in Latin America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v50i0.65389Keywords:
community forests, traditional territorialities, ecology of practices and knowledges, nature policiesAbstract
The present text seeks to evidence the theoretical reflections of four research groups about the Community Forests (the patrimonial agroforestry) of traditional Latin American rural territories. These Forests appear as central element in the discussion of policies of nature engendered in the rural spaces crossed by multiple socioeconomic dynamics. Socially appropriate, the forest is a symbol of the socio-cultural reproduction of the traditional way of life, connecting material and symbolic dimensions that drive the utopian projects of these collectivities in front of the hegemonic forms of the rationalization of the world of life. In the context of multiple modernities, the socio-political identity of traditional communities accesses a semantic network that connects Forest's imagery to the ontological concepts of Living, Habitat and Care, conferring, as a whole, a territoriality of coexistence that tensions in space and time. This territoriality confers resistance to the modernizing-mercantilizer project of rural spaces, giving new meanings and values to rural daily life. Based on an ecology of practices and knowledge, we will seek to highlight such ontological concepts from academic interpretations about the images, practices and regimes of nature engendered in this process and that configure these agroforestry territorialities: the first in a community Faxinalense and also Quilombola of the phytogeographic region of the Forest with Araucarias of Paraná, Brazil; another lived and interpreted territoriality is the Mapuche Williche of the Valdivian Temperate Forest region in Chile; the Paiter Suruí territoriality of the Brazilian Amazon Forest, and the Coconut Craters of the Cocos (Mata dos Cocais) of Maranhão are also presented. All these experiences allowed us to interpret the pluriverse of ontologies, from which the ways of feeling-think the sociobiodiversity of these territorialities of agroforestry coexistence are configured.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

