Environmental governance and perception about participatory processes in the Canavieiras Extractive Reserve, Bahia, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v50i0.58825Keywords:
deliberative council, fishermen, legitimacy and voice, management, participationAbstract
This study analyzes the participatory processes in the context of the Canavieiras Extractive Reserve (Resex), a Sustainable Use conservation unit located in the coastal zone of southern Bahia and belonging to the marine biome. Resex de Canavieiras was created in 2006 and has a history of social conflicts since its creation. In this study we identified the participatory processes through the analysis of the principles of good governance - Legitimacy and Voice, Direction, Performance, Accountability and Fairness - and the perception of the beneficiaries about the process of creation and management of the Resex using qualitative research of an exploratory nature, using techniques of documentary analysis, non-participant observation and interviews directed to the members of the Deliberative Council and the fishermen of the Resex. Data analysis was conducted using the Content Analysis for governance data and frequency of respondents opinion for perception analysis. It was found that the principles of good governance are present in the formal descriptions and actions developed by the Deliberative Council of the Resex de Canavieiras, with greater emphasis on Legitimacy and Voice and Direction. The Mother Association of Extractivists of the Extractivist Reserve of Canavieiras (Amex) influences the management process of the Unit through the actions of the extractivist councilors. Regarding the perception of the beneficiaries, it was found that only 33% of the interviewees said they had heard about Protected Areas (AP); on the other hand, 97% of the interviewees said they knew about the existence of Resex, although only 3% understood its meaning. The study points out that the area presented normative quality characteristic of good governance and that the beneficiaries perceived the benefits brought during the process of implementation of the protected area.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

