Conflicts in the Environmental License of SHPs: The Cases of Dois Saltos and Água Limpa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v43i0.53840Keywords:
environmental license, hydropower, conflictAbstract
The National Environment Policy (Law 6.938/1981) was a milestone that included the environmental component in the management of public policies, as well as a democratic progress in political life. Its instrument, the environmental licensing, is responsible for establishing potentially impactful projects, such as hydroelectric power, but its process has incited the emergence of numerous social conflicts and clashes. Therefore, the research aims to understand the dynamics of the controversy surrounding the environmental licensing, specifically in small hydropower plants (SHPs) of Paraná. It is characterized as qualitative and explanatory; bibliographic methodological design; and applied, about nature and result. It is based on books, scientific articles, and preliminary environmental studies of the Environmental Institute of Paraná, information from the National Electric Energy Agency and reports from local media. Based on two studies of conflicting cases. The data demonstrates that Paraná has aimed to SHP; that permeates different actors and conflicts. It appears that the problem is not about the capability of the instrument, but in the inability of his management, made by their managers, which has conditioned this scenario. The identification of the institutional issue (arrangement, rules and actors – with their perceptions about the process), is what provides a better understanding of this scenario and the opportunities for improving the instrument.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

