From Biodiversity Conservation to Power Strategies: The Implementation of the New Brazilian Forest Code in the Amazon Rainforest based on Two Theoretical Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v42i0.48865Keywords:
New Brazilian Forest Code, implementation, environmental changes, political strategiesAbstract
This article discusses the new Brazilian Forest Code as a symbol of the crisis in the society / nature relationship. To this end, it uses the results of field research on the process of implementing the new Code in the portion of the Amazon Rainforest inside the state of Pará, and is based on two theoretical approaches – Political Ecology and Conservation Biology – seeking an ontology of the socio-environmental problem. The study revealed a set of interrelated political strategies used by socially influential groups and endorsed by the reworking of the Code. These strategies are materialized in the implementation process, resulting in environmental changes and in an evident appropriation of the collective natural resources by private entities.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

