Science and Technique Regarding the Issue of Environmental Crisis: Theoretical Approaches for the Debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v38i0.44812Keywords:
environmental crisis, science and technique, philosophy of technology, myth of progress, risky societyAbstract
The current paper begins by drawing a historical path about how the human thought understands the relation between science, technique and nature. This path begins with the “myth of progress,”, that arises within the scientific revolution and reaches its pick during the industrial modernity; passes by the disenchantment and technological pessimism of the interwar and post-war period and culminates with the perception that nowadays we live in a risky society. Subsequently, the paper turns to the philosophy of technology in order to discuss if the human technique, understood as one of the causes of environmental crisis, can be democratically reformed in a way that its development respects the harmonic relation with the environment. Based on Andrew Feenberg’s critic theory, we give a positive answer to the question.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.







.png)




