Urban Beach Management: A Comparative Analysis of Governance Processes in Pocitos (Montevideo, Uruguay) and Central (Balneário Camboriú - SC, Brazil) Beaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v36i0.43858Keywords:
governance, integrated coastal zone management, beach managementAbstract
Traditionally, beach management has not encouraged governance, which is essential for the sustainability of these coastal environments, as it promotes actions for the common good. This work aims to understand and compare the governance processes in the management of Pocitos beach (Montevideo, Uruguay) and Central beach (Balneário Camboriú-SC, Brazil). The goals were to characterize the institutional framework of the beach management, the stakeholders involved, and the results achieved in both cases suggesting adjustments to the current designs and tools. Semi structured interviews based on six components of governance were conducted and classified. The institution responsible for beach management and the stakeholders were approached via Snowball Sampling technique. On Pocitos beach, management activities are performed through a participative and integrative process, mainly involving government divisions that conform a committee meeting weekly. This committee allows the implementation of governance processes. However, improvements are needed, especially in terms of participation of a wider range of stakeholders. On Central beach, management activities show a weak integration between the municipal government divisions, and the participation of stakeholders. A management alternative similar to that of Pocitos beach is suggested for Central beach. The main contribution of this work is the proposal of a recommendations set for the management of the two beaches addressed, as well as a generalization for other beaches in both countries. We highlight the need for beach management processes characterized by being local, public, participatory, formalized and integrated.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.







.png)




