The regularization of quilombola communities' territories in the area of influence of the São Francisco river transposition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v61i0.79559Keywords:
transposition, development, quilombolas, recognition, titrationAbstract
In Brazil, since the enactment of the Federal Constitution of 1988, significant changes have taken place in legislation, especially for the remaining quilombola communities, hitherto criminalized. Thus, in an attempt to repair this damage, one has the Article 68 of the Transitional Constitutional Provisions Act (ADCT), the main legal mechanism for the recognition of property for quilombolas. However, although it is recognized as an advance, the definitive issuance of the property title for the communities is slow in the demarcation and titling stages. Currently, they are countless recognized communities of quilombo remnants, but are very few definitely titled. It is in this scenario of uncertainty that are the quilombola communities impacted by the São Francisco River Integration Project (PISF), under the responsibility of the current Ministry of Regional Development. The present study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Quilombola Land Regularization Subprogram in the remaining quilombola communities listed by the Basic Environmental Plan (PBA 17) of the PISF. The research is a qualitative approach and an exploratory-descriptive study. The 1st stage included bibliographic and documentary research on documents and information from websites, official websites of public bodies, mainly from the Ministry of National Integration, today the Ministry of Regional Development, from the Palmares Cultural Foundation - FCP and from the National Institute of Colonization and Agrarian Reform. – INCRA. The 2nd stage was aimed at systematization and data analysis. This research is justified by presenting relevant information for the quilombola communities impacted by the project of transposition of the São Francisco River. The results point to a slowness in the processes of demarcation and titling of quilombola lands, the communities affected the PISF, caused mainly by the inertia of the federal government, in addition to pointing out that PBA 17 was partially implemented, as only one community obtained its partial titling.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.







.png)




