Extractivism in Mozambique: Building Other Debates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v38i0.43474Keywords:
natural goods, development, wealth redistribution, self-determination of peoplesAbstract
This text presents a comprehensive proposal to debate the contours and dynamics of natural resources exploitation in Mozambique. The development of the debate proposed here presents a critique for the development of Mozambique, by various countries of the world, as an extractive and lucrative development model with essentially capitalist traits. It criticizes academic and political positions in the country which do not try to overcome the barriers of conventional development concepts and exploitation of natural resources, thus not demonstrating any signs of disruptions and questioning of this model. In the article, we will discuss ways and proposals for further action in the holding of assets, considering various global experiences, particularly from Latin America. These discussions contain within them variables that GDP could not capture, such as ecological issues.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.
