Social organization and organic production in agroecological Land Reform territories in the state of Alagoas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v62i0.83370Keywords:
participatory certification, agroecology, public policiesAbstract
The organization of families settled to constitute an Organic Quality Participatory Guarantee System (PGS) evidences the territorial character and the organizational diversity of this methodology aimed at assessing organic compliance. The current study was carried out in two Land Reform settlements from the state of Alagoas, which have settled families working in the Agroecology and organic production field and that, since 2019, have been part of a state-level articulation to formalize an Organic Compliance Participatory Assessment Body (OCPAB). In order to develop the paper, the action-research method was adopted, and information collection instruments were used, such as a semi-structured questionnaire and a field diary. The results evidenced that there are local participatory certification groups in the Land Reform context. They can consist exclusively of families from the same settlement or include other settlements in the proximities and they can also be comprised by families officially regularized or not in the settlement. In other words, the PGS allows the groups to create their own territorial organization logic. And, in these terms, the territory evidences the material and immaterial aspect of the peasants' connection with the land, represented by the symbology in the choice of names for the groups and also in welcoming families that still intend to gain legal possession of the land. Our study also evidenced the differential of the Federal Brazilian legislation that deals with organic agriculture, especially for having created three compliance assessment mechanisms that expand the possibilities to include family agriculture in this context and for adapting organic production to the different realities of the territories.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

