Selective collection: Factors guiding the process based on the case study of a medium-sized city in Minas Gerais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v62i0.82725Keywords:
solid waste, selective collection, recycling, source separation, adherence by the populationAbstract
One of the crucial elements that determine the success or failure of Selective Collection Programs (SCPs) in the municipalities consists of popular participation, as this process depends directly on source separation. For this reason, studies that identify favorable or unfavorable conditions for this participation are of utmost importance for SCP planning. However, there is a gap in this type of research in the Brazilian context. In this scenario, this study aimed at identifying, based on the residents' perceptions, the demographic, motivation and barrier factors that influence the decision to separate solid waste at source in the urban area of a medium-sized city and, taking these perceptions into account, propose alternatives to increase SCP efficiency. To achieve this goal, a questionnaire survey was conducted, with the sample defined by a random probability method of three-stage cluster sampling. A total of 850 questionnaires were considered valid, with 95% confidence interval, 3% error margin and 78% maximum variability. It was found that the main determinants for the decision to separate waste at source were age group, schooling level, environmental quality, domestic and public area infrastructures, lack of time and amount of solid waste generated. It was also observed that 82% of the population already carry out some type of solid waste segregation and that 86.82% are willing to participate in SCPs. Therefore, it is recommended to adapt the language and communication means used in the programs according to the target audience, considering accessibility and understanding of each one. The current study corroborates the future applicability of selective collection programs as a sustainability tool for solid waste management, encouraging further research in this area and as a basis for structuring environmental education programs focused on selective collection.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

