Inventory of Agroecological Practices as part of the "Peasant to Peasant" Methodology in Ceará: an instrument to decolonize a territory and (re)value peasant knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v58i0.77777Keywords:
inventory of practices, agroecology, peasant to peasant, territorialization, decolonizationAbstract
In this article we address the use of an inventory or mapping of agroecological practices, which is part of the "Peasant to Peasant" methodology (PtP) for promoting the territorialization of peasant agroecology, as a method that also serves for the epistemic decolonization of a territory. The so-called Green Revolution involved the imposition of exogenous technologies and knowledge, causing the fragmentation and devaluing of local peasant knowledge and farming practices adapted to local conditions. In effect, it was an epistemic colonization. The PtP methodology is based on peasant protagonism to recover and socialize agroecological knowledge. We use the case of the PtP process in the Santana land reform settlement of the Landless Rural Workers Movement (MST) in Ceará, Brazil, to demonstrate and analyze the inventory of Practices as a collective tool for decolonization as part of the territorialization of agroecology.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

