Relationships between ecological restoration and environmental education: a critical view from Enrique Leff's conceptual framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v58i0.76060Keywords:
dialogue of knowledge dialogue, ecocentrism, environmental rationality, environmental knowledge and restoration of ecosystemsAbstract
Ecological restoration (ER) arises from Leopold's environmental ethics in the 1930s. Since about 1970, the discipline was consolidated with exponential growth in social movements and environmental policies. Analysis of the current and future development of the ER is currently on international and national journals, networks, societies, and within environmental public policies. In this last case, to such a degree, it is considered to be one of the rights of nature in the Latin American Constitutions, such as in Ecuador, Bolivia, and in the United Nations priority plan between 2021-2030. However, ER is poorly addressed in the field of environmental education. In this scenario, we consider it appropriate to confront some theoretical frameworks of environmental thought with the meaning and practices of ecological restoration and environmental education. With this in mind, based on a literature review and an interview with Enrique Leff, we present a critical view of the ER around three topics: a) A synthesis of an environmental conceptual framework of Enrique Leff; b) the historical development of ecological restoration, c) the relationships between Leff's conceptual framework, ecological restoration, and environmental education. We conclude that ER has “plasticity” to be included in different rational frameworks. Finally, we propose three historical periods of the ER: the ecocentric period, the scientific-technological period, and a new growing humanistic, creative and critical period in which education plays a central role.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.