Cattle ranching in extractive reserve: threat or need? The case of Tapajós-Arapiuns Extractive Reserve, Pará State, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v51i0.62902Keywords:
livestock breeding, Tapajos-Arapiuns Extractive Reserve, management of Conservation UnitsAbstract
The development of livestock activities within Extractive Reserves in the Amazon has been the cause of controversies and inflammatory debates in the environmental area since the establishment of the SNUC Law. The history of the extractive movement had in the "draws" its main fight flag, as a strategy to fight the advance of the agricultural frontier. Regardless of the advances made by the movement, it is a fact that, over the last 20 years, cattle ranching has been the predominant use in deforested areas in the Amazon, including within the Extractive Reserves. This work sought to measure the current environmental impact caused by the conversion of forests to pasture formation in Federal Extractive Reserves, under the management of ICMBio, based on the analysis of the data provided by INPE/TerraClass Project, from the years 2004, 2010 and 2014, especially in the Tapajós-Arapiuns Extractive Reserve, one of the most populous in the state of Pará, besides promoting a socio-environmental analysis of this case in the face of the management challenges of the Protected Area-PA. Among the main results, it was observed that the contribution of pastures is below 3% of land use in 28 of the 30 terrestrial Resex in the Amazon. It is noteworthy that in the Tapajos-Arapiuns more than 90% of the area is preserved, with only 0.35% being pasture, supporting a herd of about 3,000 heads and an average of 14 heads per farmer. Another relevant aspect is related to the financial and social importance of the activity, since 60% of breeders reported that their herds supply the Resex communities, that is, they are marketed within the PA itself. It is concluded that the cattle raising activity in the Tapajós-Arapiuns Extractive Reserve was characterized as subsistence due to the size and modes of production identified and, finally, it is not the main vector of deforestation in the PA, and its contribution is practically irrelevant.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

