The Agroecological Paradigm and the Crises of Contemporary Society: Socio-Anthropological Contributions from the Mimetic Theory Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v41i0.51341Keywords:
hypermodernity, reflexive modernity, counterproductivity, mimetic theory, agroecologyAbstract
Due to its potential and large range of ecological, theoretical and efficient methods, agroecology stands out among the several alternatives that enable the socio-ecological contemporary crisis, a consequence of globalization, to overcome its challenges. Hence her dimension of a paradigm. Several theoretical and analytical proposals try to understand the roots and the historical circumstances of the current global situation in which the agricultural challenges take place. We chose one of them for its explanatory power: mimetic theory, which analyses the anthropological role of sacred preventing violence throughout prohibitions in limiting access to certain kinds of goods and in performing sacrifice in moments of crisis. It also enables to understand the effects of desacralization as a factor of unlimited consume in modernity by unbinding desires. If nothing is considered sacred anymore then there are no more obstacles for manipulating what once was nature, except laws. Desacralization means also desritualization of the man-nature-agriculture relationship, leading to integration of agriculture within the global market. In modern times, hubris can only be contained by genuine autonomy (i.e. self-limitation). If autonomy fails, what does remain? Anomy? Agroecology, due to its anthropological pertinence and consistency, represents one of these alternative options. This paper aims to establish a link between mimetic theory and agroecological paradigm.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

