Technique and environmental ethic: a debate between Jonas, and Larrère and Larrère
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v45i0.50627Keywords:
ethics, nature, politics, techniqueAbstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze the implications of the power of technique over nature and the ethical principles that aim to overcome these problems in the contemporary world, with Hans Jonas and Catherine and Raphäel Larrère as central authors. The central issue of this text is that these three authors are in agreement about the fact that the promise of modern technology has been converted into a threat to humanity, and that the assumptions of traditional ethics are no longer sufficiently adequate to overcome this situation. However, there is conflict regarding the operationalization of a more effective response to this problem. Jonas proposes the "responsibility principle," while Larrère & Larrère suggest the "precautionary principle." Thus, this article aims to contribute to the current debate on environmental ethics in the environmental sciences, from an interdisciplinary perspective.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

