From the forest to the coast: co-management instruments and the institutional legacy of Extractive Reserves
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v48i0.58759Keywords:
institutional arrangements, participatory management, environmental legislationAbstract
Several authors have made elucidative contributions on the evolution of extractive reserves (Resex), from their original conception to their institutionalization as an environmental policy. Part of this literature points out transformations on the institutional arrangements, when they are formalized and recognized by the State. This article presents the co-management instruments of Brazilian Marine Extractive Reserves and an analysis of their formal arrangements evolution, based on secondary data and an assessment of pertinent legislation since the first Resex decree. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 managers of Coastal and Marine Resex. The interviews aimed to identify all co-management instruments used in each Resex, their stage of implementation as well as the managers' perception on these instruments. We consider co-management instruments as formal arrangements that require participatory procedures or that act as arenas for decision-making. The results show that the legacy of the rubber tappers social movement in 80’s, which created an inclusive model of protected area, is presented in the formal arrangements established over time. The instruments for co-management are divided into instruments of territorial recognition and beneficiaries, instruments for land use planning, arenas for discussion and deliberation, as well as public policies for Resex. This institutional framework has become increasingly robust over time, although it still needs to be improved. Part of the challenges include a reduction on bureaucratic procedures for the formal recognition of these instruments and the technocratic logic of the State that is often exercising tutelage rather than social emancipation of traditional people.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

