Democracy and public opinion heading into the 2020 US elections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/cg.v10i2.79488Abstract
This article has as its central core the relations between the functioning of democracy and the public opinion place on it, with the American elections in 2020 as an outlook. Therefore, there is the central objective of understanding the main events that had a significant influence on the election, and, in this way, they were able to “mold” public opinion both for the vote itself and for the general conception of the main characteristics of democracy in the country. From this, it becomes possible to explore the main effects of public opinion - mainly in a polarized context such as that of the 2020 election in the USA - on the electoral process and democracy, understanding its main effects and implications. To achieve these objectives, Robert Dahl's works on democracy and its conceptualization are used, as well as scientific articles, reports, and journalistic articles for empirical bases on the contexts involved in the country for the elections. The analysis carried out and described in the following sections, therefore, contributes to the understanding of the intrinsic relationship between society and the democratic system in which it finds itself, as well as how phenomena influence the process of social mobilization and this, in turn, time, at the polls. Public opinion, therefore, is not only a factor with a media impact and is only based on the vote, but it also comprises a series of spheres that directly affect the pillars structured as the basis of democracy.
Keywords: Democracy; Public Opinion; USA elections; Robert Dahl.
References
ALONSO, Angela. Repertório, segundo Charles Tilly: História de um conceito. Sociologia & Antropologia, v. 2, n. 3. 2012, pp. 21-41.
BACCINI, Leonardo; BRODEUR, Abel; WEYMOUTH, Stephen. The COVID-19
Pandemic and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. Intitute of Labor Economics, 2020.
BAPTISTA, Renata Ribeiro; AGUIAR, Júlio César de. Fake news, eleições e comportamento. Direito, Estado e Sociedade, v. XX, 2020.
BERNARDI, Ana Julia Bonzanini; COSTA, Andressa Liegi Vieira. Populismo e fake news na era da pós-verdade: comparações entre Estados Unidos, Hungria e Brasil. Cadernos de Campo, n. 28, 2020, p. 385-412.
CASO GEORGE FLOYD: MORTE DE HOMEM NEGRO FILMADO COM POLICIAL BRANCO COM JOELHO EM SEU PESCOÇO CAUSA INDIGNAÇÃO NOS EUA. BBC NEWS, 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/internacional-52818817>. Acesso em 16 out. 2021.
DAHL, Robert Alan. Sobre a democracia. Trad. Beatriz Sidou. Brasília: UnB, 2001.
DAHL, Robert Alan. Um prefácio à teoria democrática. Trad. Ruy Jungmann. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 1989.
DAHL, Robert Alan. Poliarquia: Participação e oposição. Trad. Celso Mauro Paciornik. São Paulo: Edusp, 1997.
DAHL, Robert Alan. A Constituição norte-americana é democrática? Trad. Vera Ribeiro. Rev. Mario Brockmann Machado. São Paulo: FGV, 2015.
DAHL, Robert Alan. “The pseudodemocratization of the American Presidency”. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Harvard University, apr. 1988.
DAHL, Robert Alan. “Os sistemas políticos democráticos nos países avançados: Êxitos e desafios”. In: BORON, Atilio A. (org.). Nova hegemonia mundial: Alternativas de mudança e movimentos sociais. Trad. J.C.C.B. Silva. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2004, pp. 53-72.
DAHL, Robert Alan. “O mito do mandato presidencial”. Trad. Isa Mara Lando. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, n. 24, set. 1991, pp. 27-54.
DAHL, Robert Alan. “Os sistemas políticos democráticos nos países avançados: Êxitos e desafios”. In: BORON, Atilio A. (org.). Nova hegemonia mundial: Alternativas de mudança e movimentos sociais. Trad. J.C.C.B. Silva. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2004, pp. 53-72.
ESTUDO MOSTRA EFICIÊNCIA DO ISOLAMENTO SOCIAL CONTRA O NOVO
CORONAVÍRUS. Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, 11 de maio de 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.uerj.br/noticia/11078/>. Acesso em 16 out. 2021.
FERREIRA et al. A América em primeiro lugar: o discurso de Donald Trump. Le Monde Diplomatique Brasil, Populismo e Crise, 2021.
GONÇALVES, Williams; TEIXEIRA, Tatiana. Trump e a inflexão da Grande Estratégia. Tempo do Mundo, v. 5, n. 1, 2019, p. 177-200.
INATOMI, Celly Cook. Direitos Civis e o Governo Trump: impressões sobre um antagonismo. Tempo do Mundo, v.5, n.1, 2019, p. 67-106.
LEE, Terry. The global rise of “fake news” and the threat to democratic elections in the USA. Public Administration and Policy, v. 22, n. 1, 2019, p. 15-24.
LIPPMANN, Walter. “Public Opinion”, New York, Harcourt Brace, 1922.
LOWI, THEODORE & CALISE, Mauro. Hyperpolitics an interactive dictionary of politic. The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London, 2010.
MORAIS, Jennifer Azambuja de; COSTA, Andressa Liegi Vieira; BERNARDI, Ana Julia Bonzanini. Populismo, polarização política e a pandemia do coronavírus: Donald Trump e a opinião pública nos Estados Unidos. Debates, Porto Alegre, v. 14, n. 3, 2020, p. 126-149.
OLIVER, J. Eric; RAHN, Wendy M. Rise of Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 election. The Annals of American Academy, 2016.
PECEQUILO, Cristina S.; MAGNOTA, Fernanda. A eleição nos EUA e seus desdobramentos para o Brasil. 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re_UdcfbNOQ&t=1412s>. Acesso em 16 out. 2021.
SCHATTSCHENEIDER, E. Elmer. The Semisovereign People, New York, Rinehart and Winston, 1960.
SHAPIRO, Robert. Public Opinion and American Democracy. Public Opinion Quaterly, v. 75, n. 5, 2011, p. 982-1017.
TILLY, Charles. Movimentos Sociais como Política. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, n. 3. Brasília, janeiro-julho de 2010, pp. 133-160.
TILLY, Charles. Social movements and (all sorts of) other political interactions - local, national, and international - including identities. Theory and Society, v. 27. 1998, p. 453480.
TILLY, Charles. Social Movements as Historically Specific Clusters of Political Performances. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, v. 38. 1993-1994, p. 1-30.
VINHA, Luís da. Previsivelmente incoerente: Uma análise preliminar da política externa de Donald Trump. Relações Internacionais, Lisboa, n. 55, p. 09-33, set. 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Conjuntura Global (ISSN 2317 - 6563) editors reserve the right to adapt the submissions to the journal's editorial standard format. The articles and reviews are under the responsibility of their authors and do not express the opinion of Conjuntura Global's editors.
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), that allows the work to be shared with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
- Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., to publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
- The approval of the submission automatically implies the authorization to Conjuntura Global to forward the relevant information to the scientific journals' indexing databases.
