THE SANTIAGO PRINCIPLES FOR THE SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUNDS: A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Pedro Lange Netto Machado Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/cg.v7i1.58157

Abstract

This article analyses the Santiago Principles as an international regime in formation. With the threat of financial protectionism by concerned countries with Sovereign Wealth Funds’ acts, these principles appear as a proposal for regulation in this area. However, their strictly voluntary character generates doubts and incredulity against their efficacy (PARK; ESTRADA, 2011). In face of these concerns, this article presents the hypotheses that the Santiago Principles represent an international regime in formation, which could bring to the formation of a collective identity among its participants. This hypothesis is sustained by Krasner’s (1982) and Keohane’s (1984) theories, who provide the theoretical basis about international regimes, and by Wendt’s (1999), who instantiates the construction of this possible collective identity. Through these authors’ theoretical lens, associated with studies by the International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds, the presented hypothesis is confirmed.

Key-words: Sovereign Wealth Funds; Santiago Principles; International regime; Collective identity.

References

ARIENTI, Patrícia F. F.; VIERA, Luan. A economia política dos Fundos de Riqueza Soberana. Contexto Internacional, v. 35, n. 1, Rio de Janeiro, Jan./Junho 2013.

COHEN, Benjamin J. Sovereign wealth funds and national security: the Great Tradeoff. International Affairs, 85:4, 2009, pp: 713-731.

FUNDS, International Forum of Sovereign Wealth. Santiago Principles. Disponível em: <http://www.ifswf.org/santiago-principles-landing/santiago-principles> Acessado em 14 de janeiro de 2018.

GILPIN, Robert. Global political economy: understanding the international economic order. Princeton University Press, 2001.

KEOHANE, Robert O. After Hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.

KRASNER, Stephen G. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. International Organization, v. 36, n. 2, International Regimes, Spring 1982, pp: 185-205.

MEARSHEIMER, John J; WALT, Stephen M. Leaving Theory Behind: Why Hypothesis Testing Has Become Bad for IR. European Journal of International Relations, v. 19, n. 3, 2013, pp: 427-457.

NORTON, Joseph F. The Santiago Principles for Sovereign Wealth Funds: A case study for internacional financial standart-setting processes. Journal of International Economic Law, v. 13, n. 3, 2010.

PARK, Donghyun; ESTRADA, Gemma E. Developing Asia’s Sovereign Wealth Funds: The Santiago Principles and the case for self-regulation. Asian Journal of International Law, v. 1, n. 2, junho de 2011, pp: 383-402.

WENDT, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

XAVIER JR., Ely C. Fundos Soberanos de Investimento e imunidade de jurisdição. Revista Direito GV, v. 10, n. 1, SãoPaulo, Jan./Junho 2014.

Published

2018-05-25

How to Cite

Machado, P. L. N. (2018). THE SANTIAGO PRINCIPLES FOR THE SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUNDS: A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS. Conjuntura Global, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.5380/cg.v7i1.58157

Issue

Section

Articles