ENDOPARASITAS EM CÃES (Canis familiaris) NA CIDADE DE CURITIBA – PARANÁ – BRASIL

Authors

  • L.C. LEITE
  • L.P. MARINONI
  • S.M. CÍRIO
  • J.M.F. DINIZ
  • M.A.N. SILVA
  • E. LUZ
  • H.P. MOLINARI
  • C.S.G. VARGAS
  • S.C. LEITE
  • A.C.B. ZADOROSNEI
  • E.M. VERONESI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v9i2.4071

Keywords:

Toxocara spp., Ancylostoma spp., zoonose, endoparasitas, endoparasites.

Abstract

O presente trabalho analisa prospectivamente as infecções múltiplas e isoladas em cães de estudantes de quatro instituições de ensino de Curitiba PR, através de exames de 264 amostras de fezes, colhidas no período de abril a julho de 2000 e examinadas de acordo com a técnica de WILLIS (1921). A infecção isolada causada por Ancylostoma sp. foi observada em maior porcentagem, seguida da parasitose múltipla pela associação Ancylostoma sp./Toxocara sp.

Enteroparasites in dogs (Canis familiaris) from Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil

Abstract

The present study demonstrates the multiple and isolated infections caused by enteroparasites in dogs belonged to students of four schools from Curitiba, PR, by examination of 264 fecal samples, collected from April to July, 2000, and analyzed by the WILLIS (1921) technique. The isolated infection by Ancylostoma sp. was the highest percentage observed, while Ancylostoma sp. and Toxocara sp. were the multiple parasites most frequently found.

Downloads

How to Cite

LEITE, L., MARINONI, L., CÍRIO, S., DINIZ, J., SILVA, M., LUZ, E., … VERONESI, E. (2004). ENDOPARASITAS EM CÃES (Canis familiaris) NA CIDADE DE CURITIBA – PARANÁ – BRASIL. Archives of Veterinary Science, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v9i2.4071

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2004)

Section

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

License

Authors that wish to publish in AVS agree with the following conditions:

  1. To keep copyright of the article and allow the AVS to publish the first time. The article will be licensed by Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional allowing the sharing of their work.
  2. Authors may distribute their work by other channel of distribution (ex.: local or public repository).
  3. Authors have the permission to publish their work online, using different channels (similar to above), even before the final editorial process.