Judicial federalism in the United States: structure, jurisdiction and operation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v2i3.44526Palabras clave:
judicial federalism, Judicial branch, federal and states courts, Criminal Law, United StatesResumen
The present article aims to analyze the judicial federalism in the United States. To do so, it compares the jurisdiction and the autonomy of the federal and states courts, concluding that the model adopted in the Judiciary is similar to that followed by the Executive and Legislative branches. Furthermore, it analyzes the federalization of Criminal Law, affirming that, in this field, the defendants have the right to appeal to federal courts every time that some damage has been caused to them based on a state law, violating a federal law. By the end, it concludes that, despite the existence of some endemic and periodical problems, the American system of judicial federalism has largely succeeded in promoting national uniformity and subnational diversity in the administration of justice.
Citas
BATOR, Paul. The State Courts and Federal Constitutional Litigation, William & Mary Law Review, Williamsburg, vol. 22, n. 4, ago./oct. 1981, p. 605-638.
BRENNAN JR, William J. State Supreme Court Judges versus United States Supreme Court Justice: A Change in Function and Perspective. University of Florida Law Review, Gainesville, vol. 19, 1996.
CALABRESI, Guido. Federal and State Courts: Restoring a Workable Balance. New York University Law Review, New York, vol. 78, n. 4, oct. 2003, p. 1293-1308.
CARBERRY, Charles M. The State Advisory Opinion in Perspective. Fordham Law Review, New York, vol. 44, n. 1, 1975, p. 81-113.
CLYMER, Steven D. Unequal Justice: The Federalization of Criminal Law. Southern California Law Review, Los Angeles, vol. 70, mar. 1997, p. 643-739.
COVER, Robert M.; ALEINIKOFF, T. Alexander. Dialectical Federalism: Habeas Corpus and the Court. Yale Law Journal, New Haven, vol. 86, may 1997, p. 1035-1102.
EHRLICH, Susan A. The Increasing Federalization of Crime. Arizona State Law Journal, Tempe, vol. 32, sep./nov. 2000, p. 825-842.
ELAZAR, Daniel J. Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1987.
FALLON, Richard. Hart and Wechsler’s The Federal Courts in the Federal System. 4th ed. Westbury: Foundation Press, 1996.
FLANGO, Victor E; MCKENNA, Patricia. Federal Habeas Corpus Review of State Court Convictions. California Western Law Review, Riverside, vol. 31, n. 2, mar./may 1995, p. 237-275.
FLANGO, Victor Eugene; BLAIR, Nora F. Creating an Intermediate Appellate Court: Does It Reduce the Caseload of a State’s Highest Court? Judicature, Durham, vol. 64, aug. 1980, p. 74-84.
FRIESEN, Jennifer. State Constitutional Law: Litigating Individual Rights, Claims and Defenses. 4th ed. Charlottesville: LexisNexis, 2006.
FROHNMEYER, David B.; LINDE, Hans A. State Court Responsibility for Maintaining ‘Republican Government’: An Amicus Curiae Brief. Willamette Law Review, Salem, vol. 39, n. 1, oct./dec. 2003, p. 1487-1505.
GROOT, Roger D. The Effects of an Intermediate Appellate Court on the Supreme Court Work Product: The North Carolina Experience. Wake Forest Law Review, Winston-Salem, vol. 7, 1971, p. 546-572.
MARCUS, Maeva (Ed.). The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1790-1800. vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.
MARONEY, Thomas J. Fifty Years of Federalization of Criminal Law: Sounding the Alarm or ‘Crying Wolf’. Syracuse Law Review, Syracuse, vol. 50, 2000, p. 1317-1378.
NEUBORNE, Burt. The Myth of Parity. Harvard Law Review, New Haven, vol. 90, n. 6, apr. 1977, p. 1105-1131.
REDISH, Martin H. Federal Jurisdiction: Tensions in the Allocation of Judicial Power. Indianapolis: Michie, 1980.
ROSSUM, Ralph A.; TARR, G. Alan. American Constitutional Law: Volume II - The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments. 9th ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2013.
ROSSUM, Ralph A.; TARR, G. Alan. American Constitutional Law: Volume I – The Structure of Government. 9th ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2013. Chapter 3.
SERON, Caroll. Certifying Questions of State Law: Experience of Federal Judges. Washington DC: Federal Judicial Center, 1983.
TARR, G. Alan. The New Judicial Federalism in Perspective. Notre Dame Law Review, Notre Dame, vol. 72, n. 4, may 1997, p. 1097-1118.
TARR, G. Alan. Without Fear or Favor: Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability in the States. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012.
WILLIAMS, Robert F. The Brennan Lecture: Interpreting State Constitutions as Unique Legal Documents. Oklahoma City University Law Review, Oklahoma, vol. 27, mar./may 2002, p. 189-229.
Descargas
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Autores mantienen los derechos autorales y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo simultáneamente licenciado bajo la Creative Commons - Atribución 4.0 Internacional que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Autores tienen autorización para asumir contratos adicionales separadamente, para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (ej.: publicar en repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Autores tienen permiso y son estimulados a publicar y difundir su trabajo online (ej.: en repositorios institucionales o en su página personal) a cualquier punto antes o durante el proceso editorial, ya que esto puede generar alteraciones productivas, así como aumentar el impacto y la citación del trabajo publicado (Véase El Efecto del Acceso Libre).
