Regulando a incerteza: a construção de modelos decisórios e os riscos do paradoxo da determinação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v3i3.48159Keywords:
incerteza, regulação, metodologia de construção de teorias, modelos decisórios, paradoxo da determinaçãoAbstract
O objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar e explorar os problemas decorrentes da desconsideração de diagnósticos sobre o funcionamento da realidade em teorias normativas – sobretudo teorias sobre a tomada de decisão judicial. Esses não são problemas de natureza conceitual ou empírica, mas de natureza metodológica. Levá-los a sério é importante para que os diálogos entre teorias jurídicas normativas e as explicações fornecidas por outras ciências sobre o comportamento de determinados atores (como juízes) sejam metodologicamente rigorosos e, assim, possam produzir resultados efetivamente relevantes no domínio do direito.
References
ALEXY, Robert. Hauptelemente einer Theorie der Doppelnatur des Rechts. ARSP, [s.l.], vol. 95, n. 2, p. 151-166, abr. 2009.
ALEXY, Robert. The nature of arguments about the nature of law. In: MEYER, Lukas, PAULSON, Stanley L. & POGGE, Thomas Winfried Menko (Eds.). Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes From the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
ALEXY, Robert. Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. 2. ed. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1991.
BHAGWATI, Jagdish, BRECHER, Richard A. SRINIVASAN, T. N. DUP Activities and Economic Theory. European Economic Review, [s.l.], vol. 24, n. 3, p. 291-307, apr. 1984.
BIX, Brian. Robert Alexy, Radbruch’s Formula, and the Nature of Legal Theory. Rechtstheorie, Vol. 37, p. 139-149, 2006.
COLEMAN, Jules. Methodology. In: COLEMAN, Jules; SHAPIRO, Scott J. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
DICKSON, Julie. Evaluation and Legal Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001.
FALCÃO, Joaquim; SCHUARTZ, Luis Fernando; WERNECK, Diego. Jurisdição, incerteza e Estado de Direito. Revista de Direito Administrativo, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 243, p. 79-112, 2006.
HAGE, Jaap. Law and Defeasibility. In: ____. Studies in Legal Logic. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005, p. 7-32.
HART, H.L.A. The ascription of responsibility and rights. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 49, p. 171-194, 1949.
KELSEN, Hans: Disukussion zum Vortrag von Erich Kaufmann, in: Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 3, 1927.
LEAL, Fernando. Irracional ou hiper-racional? A ponderação de princípios entre o ceticismo e o otimismo ingênuo. A&C – Revista de Direito Administrativo e Constitucional, Belo Horizonte, ano 14, n. 58, p. 177-209, out/dez. 2014.
LEITER, Brian; LANGLINAIS, Alex. The Methodology of legal philosophy. University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper, Chicago, n. 407, 2012. Disponível em: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/public_law_and_legal_theory/398/. Acesso em 29/12/2015.
POSNER, Eric; VERMEULE, Adrian. Inside or outside the system?. The University of Chicago Law Review, Chicago, vol. 80, n. 4, p. 1743-1797, sep/dic. 2013.
SCHAUER, Frederick. Thinking like a lawyer. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.
VERMEULE, Adrian. Judging Under Uncertainty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Constitutional Research the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see the Effect of Open Access).