Concentrated judicial review in Brazil and Colombia: which (or whose) rights are protected?
Resumo
Over the last few decades, judicial power has expanded, especially in constitutional or supreme courts. Recently, scholars in comparative constitutional law have focused their attention on analyzing the causes and consequences of this expansion in different constitutional systems. There are still no studies that compare the role played by constitutional or supreme courts in the defense of individual and social rights, specifically with regard to the link between the protection of rights and the extent to which social actors are granted standing to assert constitutional claims. This paper intends to provide some thoughts on this issue. The text will analyze the relationship between the protection of rights and the extent to which plaintiffs are granted the right to file constitutional claims in Colombia and Brazil. We conclude that the comparison between Brazil and Colombia presents relevant insights into how the dimension of authority, specifically standing to access the main courts in each system, can make a large difference in the protection of social and individual rights.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referências
ALVES, José Carlos Moreira. Poder judiciário. Revista dos Tribunais, São Paulo, ano 5, n. 18, p. 269, jan./mar. 1997.
BARROSO, Luíz Roberto. O controle de constitucionalidade no direito brasileiro. 4. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2011.
BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden. A ‘última palavra’, o poder e a história: O Supremo Tribunal Federal e o discurso de supremacia no constitucionalismo brasileiro. Revista de informação legislativa, Brasília, v. 51, n. 201, p. 71-95, jan./mar. 2014.
BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden. Do solipsismo supremo à deliberação racional. Direito, Estado e Sociedade, Rio de Janeiro, n. 50, p. 149-178, jan./jun. 2017.
BERNAL-PULIDO, Carlos. The constitutional protection of economic and social rights in Latin America. In: DIXON, Rosalind; GINSBURG, Tom (Eds.). Comparative constitutional law in Latin America. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017.
BRAZIL. Supreme Federal Court. ADPF 527 MC. Min. Roberto Barroso. Decision of July 2, 2018, published in August 31, 2018. Available at:: . Last accessed: 30 aug. 2018.
BRAZIL. Supreme Federal Court. Available at: . Last accessed: 30 aug. 2018.
BREWER-CÁRIAS, Allan-Randolph. Reflexiones sobre el constitucionalismo en América. Caracas: Jurídica Venezoelana, 2001.
BRINKS, Daniel. “Faithful Servants of the Regime”. The Brazilian Constitutional Court`s Role under 1988 Constitution. In: HELMKE, Gretchen; RIOS-FIGUEROA, Julio. Courts in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
BRINKS, Daniel; BLASS, Abby. Rethinking Judicial Empowerment: The New Foundations of Constitutional Justice. International Journal of Constitutional Law, Oxford, v. 15, n. 2, p. 296-331, apr. 2017.
CANOTILHO, José Joaquim Gomes. Direito constitucional e teoria da Constituição. 7 ed. Lisboa: Almedina, 2003.
CAPPELLETTI, Mauro. O controle judicial de constitucionalidade das leis no direito comparado. Tradução de Aroldo Plínio Gonçalves. 2. ed. reimpressão. Porto Alegre: Sergio Antonio Fabris, 1999.
CLINTON, Adam; VERSTEEG, Mila. Rights without resources: the impact of constitutional social rights on social spending. Law and Economics Research Paper Series, Charlottesville, out. 2016. Disponível em: . Acesso em 30 ago. 2018.
COLOMBIA. Colombian Constitutional Court, Judgement T-233, 04/20/17. Available at: . Last accessed: 15 aug. 2018.
COLOMBIA. Colombian Constitutional Court. Available at: . Last accessed: 30 aug. 2018
COSTA, Alexandre Araújo; BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden. A quem interessa o controle concentrado de constitucionalidade? O descompasso entre teoria e prática na defesa de direitos fundamentais. 2013. Disponível em: . Acesso em 14 ago. 2018.
ERMACORA, Felix. Österreichs Bundesverfassung und Hans Kelsen. In: MERKL, Adolf; VERDROß, Alfred; MARCIC, René; WALTER, Robert (Eds.). Festschrift Für Hans Kelsen Zum 90. Geburtstage. Wien: Verlag Franz Deuticke, 1971.
FAVOREU, Louis. Constitutional courts. Baton Rouge: Center of Civil Law Studies - LSU Law Center, 2001. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 3 abr. 2014.
GINSBURG, Tom; VERSTEEG, Mila. Why do countries adopt constitutional review? Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Oxford, v. 30, n. 3, p. 587, 2014.
HECKMANN, Dirk. Geltungskraft und Geltungsverlust von Rechtsnormen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997.
HELMKE, Gretchen; RIOS-FIGUEROA, Julio. Courts in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
HEUN, Werner. Normenkontrolle. In: BAND, Erster. Festschrift 50 Jahre Bundesverfassungsgerich. Herausgegeben von Peter Badura und Horst Dreier: Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit, Verfassungsprozeß. Tübigen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.
HIRSCHL, Ran. ‘Juristocracy’ – Political, not Juridical. The Good Society, State College, vol. 13, n. 3, p. 6-11, nov. 2004.
HIRSCHL, Ran. The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts, Annual Review of Political Science, Palo Alto, v.11, p. 93.118, 2008.
HIRSCHL, Ran. Towards Juristocracy: the origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.
IPSEN, Jörn. Rechtsfolgen der Verfassungswidrigkeit von Norm und Einzelakt. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1980.
JACKSON, Vicki C.; TUSHNET, Mark. Comparative constitutional law. 2. ed. New York: Foundation Press, 2006.
KAPISZEWSKI, Diana. Power Broker, Policy Maker, or Rights Protector: The Brazilian Supremo Tribunal Federal in Transition. In: HELMKE, Gretchen; RIOS-FIGUEROA, Julio. Courts in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
KELSEN, Hans. Jurisdição constitucional. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.
MENDES, Gilmar Ferreira. Estado de direito e jurisdição constitucional 2002-2010. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2011.
NOWAK, John. E.; ROTUNDA, Ronald D. Constitutional law. 4. ed. St. Paul: West Publishing Co., 1991, p. 1-20; 22-114.
PIEROTH, Bodo; SCHLINK, Bernhard. Direitos fundamentais. Tradução de António Francisco de Sousa e António Franco. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2012.
REHNQUIST, William. H. The Supreme Court. New York: Vintage Books, 2002.
RÍOS-FIGUEROA, Julio. Institutions for Constitutional Justice in Latin America. In: HELMKE, Gretchen; RIOS-FIGUEROA, Julio. Courts in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
RODRIGUEZ-RAGA, Juan Carlos. Strategic Deference in the Colombian Constitutional Court, 1992-2006. In: HELMKE, Gretchen; RIOS-FIGUEROA, Julio. Courts in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
ROSENBERG, Gerald. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts bring about social change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1991.
SCHOR, Miguel. Constitutionalism Through the Looking Glass of Latin America. Texas International Law Journal, Austin, v. 41, n. 1, p. 1-35, 2005.
SEGADO, Francisco Fernandez. La obsolescencia de la bipolaridade tradicional (modelo Americano – modelo europeo-kelseniano) de los sistemas de justicia constitucional. Direito Público, Brasília, ano 1, n. 2, p. 55-82, out./dez. 2003.
SNOWISS, Sylvia. Judicial review and the law of the Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.
STATON, Jeffrey; MOORE, Will. Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics, International Organization, Cambridge, v. 65, n. 3, 2011, p. 553-587.
SWEET, Alec Stone. Governing with judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
SWEET, Alec Stone; SHAPIRO, Martin. Abstract and concrete review in the United States. In: SWEET, Alec Stone; SHAPIRO, Martin. On Law, politics, and judicialization. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. 2006.
TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Tradução de R. D. Heffner. New York: New American Library, 2001.
TREANOR, William. Judicial Review before Marbury. Stanford Law Review, Stanford, v. 58, n. 2, p. 455-562, 2005.
TRIBE, Laurence H. American constitutional law. 3. ed. New York: Foundation Press, v. 1, p. 207-285; 302-385, 2000.
UNITED STATES. United States Supreme Court. Marbury v. Madison. Justia.com: US Supreme Court Center. 19 p. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 18 set. 2013.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v7i1.69583
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.