Judicial federalism in the United States: structure, jurisdiction and operation
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referências
BATOR, Paul. The State Courts and Federal Constitutional Litigation, William & Mary Law Review, Williamsburg, vol. 22, n. 4, ago./oct. 1981, p. 605-638.
BRENNAN JR, William J. State Supreme Court Judges versus United States Supreme Court Justice: A Change in Function and Perspective. University of Florida Law Review, Gainesville, vol. 19, 1996.
CALABRESI, Guido. Federal and State Courts: Restoring a Workable Balance. New York University Law Review, New York, vol. 78, n. 4, oct. 2003, p. 1293-1308.
CARBERRY, Charles M. The State Advisory Opinion in Perspective. Fordham Law Review, New York, vol. 44, n. 1, 1975, p. 81-113.
CLYMER, Steven D. Unequal Justice: The Federalization of Criminal Law. Southern California Law Review, Los Angeles, vol. 70, mar. 1997, p. 643-739.
COVER, Robert M.; ALEINIKOFF, T. Alexander. Dialectical Federalism: Habeas Corpus and the Court. Yale Law Journal, New Haven, vol. 86, may 1997, p. 1035-1102.
EHRLICH, Susan A. The Increasing Federalization of Crime. Arizona State Law Journal, Tempe, vol. 32, sep./nov. 2000, p. 825-842.
ELAZAR, Daniel J. Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1987.
FALLON, Richard. Hart and Wechsler’s The Federal Courts in the Federal System. 4th ed. Westbury: Foundation Press, 1996.
FLANGO, Victor E; MCKENNA, Patricia. Federal Habeas Corpus Review of State Court Convictions. California Western Law Review, Riverside, vol. 31, n. 2, mar./may 1995, p. 237-275.
FLANGO, Victor Eugene; BLAIR, Nora F. Creating an Intermediate Appellate Court: Does It Reduce the Caseload of a State’s Highest Court? Judicature, Durham, vol. 64, aug. 1980, p. 74-84.
FRIESEN, Jennifer. State Constitutional Law: Litigating Individual Rights, Claims and Defenses. 4th ed. Charlottesville: LexisNexis, 2006.
FROHNMEYER, David B.; LINDE, Hans A. State Court Responsibility for Maintaining ‘Republican Government’: An Amicus Curiae Brief. Willamette Law Review, Salem, vol. 39, n. 1, oct./dec. 2003, p. 1487-1505.
GROOT, Roger D. The Effects of an Intermediate Appellate Court on the Supreme Court Work Product: The North Carolina Experience. Wake Forest Law Review, Winston-Salem, vol. 7, 1971, p. 546-572.
MARCUS, Maeva (Ed.). The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1790-1800. vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.
MARONEY, Thomas J. Fifty Years of Federalization of Criminal Law: Sounding the Alarm or ‘Crying Wolf’. Syracuse Law Review, Syracuse, vol. 50, 2000, p. 1317-1378.
NEUBORNE, Burt. The Myth of Parity. Harvard Law Review, New Haven, vol. 90, n. 6, apr. 1977, p. 1105-1131.
REDISH, Martin H. Federal Jurisdiction: Tensions in the Allocation of Judicial Power. Indianapolis: Michie, 1980.
ROSSUM, Ralph A.; TARR, G. Alan. American Constitutional Law: Volume II - The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments. 9th ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2013.
ROSSUM, Ralph A.; TARR, G. Alan. American Constitutional Law: Volume I – The Structure of Government. 9th ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2013. Chapter 3.
SERON, Caroll. Certifying Questions of State Law: Experience of Federal Judges. Washington DC: Federal Judicial Center, 1983.
TARR, G. Alan. The New Judicial Federalism in Perspective. Notre Dame Law Review, Notre Dame, vol. 72, n. 4, may 1997, p. 1097-1118.
TARR, G. Alan. Without Fear or Favor: Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability in the States. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012.
WILLIAMS, Robert F. The Brennan Lecture: Interpreting State Constitutions as Unique Legal Documents. Oklahoma City University Law Review, Oklahoma, vol. 27, mar./may 2002, p. 189-229.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v2i3.44526
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.