Judicial federalism in the United States: structure, jurisdiction and operation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v2i3.44526Palavras-chave:
judicial federalism, Judicial branch, federal and states courts, Criminal Law, United StatesResumo
The present article aims to analyze the judicial federalism in the United States. To do so, it compares the jurisdiction and the autonomy of the federal and states courts, concluding that the model adopted in the Judiciary is similar to that followed by the Executive and Legislative branches. Furthermore, it analyzes the federalization of Criminal Law, affirming that, in this field, the defendants have the right to appeal to federal courts every time that some damage has been caused to them based on a state law, violating a federal law. By the end, it concludes that, despite the existence of some endemic and periodical problems, the American system of judicial federalism has largely succeeded in promoting national uniformity and subnational diversity in the administration of justice.
Referências
BATOR, Paul. The State Courts and Federal Constitutional Litigation, William & Mary Law Review, Williamsburg, vol. 22, n. 4, ago./oct. 1981, p. 605-638.
BRENNAN JR, William J. State Supreme Court Judges versus United States Supreme Court Justice: A Change in Function and Perspective. University of Florida Law Review, Gainesville, vol. 19, 1996.
CALABRESI, Guido. Federal and State Courts: Restoring a Workable Balance. New York University Law Review, New York, vol. 78, n. 4, oct. 2003, p. 1293-1308.
CARBERRY, Charles M. The State Advisory Opinion in Perspective. Fordham Law Review, New York, vol. 44, n. 1, 1975, p. 81-113.
CLYMER, Steven D. Unequal Justice: The Federalization of Criminal Law. Southern California Law Review, Los Angeles, vol. 70, mar. 1997, p. 643-739.
COVER, Robert M.; ALEINIKOFF, T. Alexander. Dialectical Federalism: Habeas Corpus and the Court. Yale Law Journal, New Haven, vol. 86, may 1997, p. 1035-1102.
EHRLICH, Susan A. The Increasing Federalization of Crime. Arizona State Law Journal, Tempe, vol. 32, sep./nov. 2000, p. 825-842.
ELAZAR, Daniel J. Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1987.
FALLON, Richard. Hart and Wechsler’s The Federal Courts in the Federal System. 4th ed. Westbury: Foundation Press, 1996.
FLANGO, Victor E; MCKENNA, Patricia. Federal Habeas Corpus Review of State Court Convictions. California Western Law Review, Riverside, vol. 31, n. 2, mar./may 1995, p. 237-275.
FLANGO, Victor Eugene; BLAIR, Nora F. Creating an Intermediate Appellate Court: Does It Reduce the Caseload of a State’s Highest Court? Judicature, Durham, vol. 64, aug. 1980, p. 74-84.
FRIESEN, Jennifer. State Constitutional Law: Litigating Individual Rights, Claims and Defenses. 4th ed. Charlottesville: LexisNexis, 2006.
FROHNMEYER, David B.; LINDE, Hans A. State Court Responsibility for Maintaining ‘Republican Government’: An Amicus Curiae Brief. Willamette Law Review, Salem, vol. 39, n. 1, oct./dec. 2003, p. 1487-1505.
GROOT, Roger D. The Effects of an Intermediate Appellate Court on the Supreme Court Work Product: The North Carolina Experience. Wake Forest Law Review, Winston-Salem, vol. 7, 1971, p. 546-572.
MARCUS, Maeva (Ed.). The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1790-1800. vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.
MARONEY, Thomas J. Fifty Years of Federalization of Criminal Law: Sounding the Alarm or ‘Crying Wolf’. Syracuse Law Review, Syracuse, vol. 50, 2000, p. 1317-1378.
NEUBORNE, Burt. The Myth of Parity. Harvard Law Review, New Haven, vol. 90, n. 6, apr. 1977, p. 1105-1131.
REDISH, Martin H. Federal Jurisdiction: Tensions in the Allocation of Judicial Power. Indianapolis: Michie, 1980.
ROSSUM, Ralph A.; TARR, G. Alan. American Constitutional Law: Volume II - The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments. 9th ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2013.
ROSSUM, Ralph A.; TARR, G. Alan. American Constitutional Law: Volume I – The Structure of Government. 9th ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2013. Chapter 3.
SERON, Caroll. Certifying Questions of State Law: Experience of Federal Judges. Washington DC: Federal Judicial Center, 1983.
TARR, G. Alan. The New Judicial Federalism in Perspective. Notre Dame Law Review, Notre Dame, vol. 72, n. 4, may 1997, p. 1097-1118.
TARR, G. Alan. Without Fear or Favor: Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability in the States. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012.
WILLIAMS, Robert F. The Brennan Lecture: Interpreting State Constitutions as Unique Legal Documents. Oklahoma City University Law Review, Oklahoma, vol. 27, mar./may 2002, p. 189-229.
Downloads
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).