Qualitative indicator of tensions in water use in territorial identities of rural and urban life: empirical evidence in the Metropolitan Region of Salvador, Bahia (Brazil)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v58i0.69907Keywords:
tensions, uses of nature, rural-urban, territorial identities, development, metropolitan civilityAbstract
The objective of this paper is to understand the distribution of the empirical evidence that intends rural and urban ways of life in relation to the use of waters and territorial identities in the Metropolitan Region of Salvador (MRS), Bahia, Brazil. A methodology based on the identification of territorial tensions, observed from 2005 to 2015, regarding the dispute over water use in the MRS, called Qualitative Indicators of Water Use Tension (QIWT). The use of QIWT allowed the identification of evidences and categorization of tensions in the use of water in the MRS, that is, interpretative and analytical methodological categories of empirical events in order to assign them phenomenon content and from then on to typify them. There was a predominance of tension by the appropriation of water (T-1), especially in the areas of greater demand for water for urban-industrial uses. The tension of the uses of water in cultural activities (T-3), the least frequent, confirmed the permanence counter-hegemonic the rural in the metropolitan space and revealed a clear potential for human development and nature conservation, because such uses demand good environmental conditions of the springs and sources of water supply. The application of the QIWT revealed a dimension of social reality, which emerged from the notions of rural and metropolitan rurality in its relationship with the use of water, ignored in the public policies of the MRS, whose environmental issue could be re-signified in the space of the metropolis as rural-urban.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.