Good Living: rethinking the creation of a new lifestyle in the post-Covid-19 age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v59i0.74145Keywords:
covid-19’s pandemic, good living, ecocentric ethics, lifestyle, eco-socioeconomiesAbstract
Unexpectedly the new Covid-19’s Pandemic has joined to the multiple interdependent syndromes which configure the accelerated worsening of the global socio-ecological crisis. This suggests the necessity to drastically review the lifestyle in practically all latitudes of the world. The uncertainties generated new civilizing designs almost half a century after the Stockholm Conference. The predictable impacts on the dominant regulation logic of economic and political-institutional systems represent a decisive vector that points in this direction. From this new and disturbing profile of the global crisis, the objective is to analyze the potential contained in the “post-development ecocentric” Good Living’s approach to take a renewed position in the most recent ecopolitical debate - now from the perspective of new lines of reflection that emerged with the outbreak of the Covid-19’s Pandemic. It uses an essay based on a descriptive stage with a literature review and critical theoretical analysis established on the interface and the post-development proposal of Good Living itself overall using the human-scale development thesis of Manfred Max-Neef and the eco-socioeconomics thesis by Karl William Kapp and Ignacy Sachs. The intention is to create a new line of academic reflection on the cognitive and ethical-political limits of the hegemonic neoliberal ideological thought in face of the increasingly disturbing signs of almost irreversible impairment of the System-Earth.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

