Socio-economic and environmental conflict over the construction of Belo Monte Hydroelectric Power Plant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v46i0.50248Keywords:
conflict, risk, political opportunity structure, Brazilian energy policy, Belo Monte Hydroelectric Power PlantAbstract
This article aims to do an analysis of the construction of Belo Monte Hydroelectric Power Plant, characterizing it as a socio-economic and environmental conflict over two main themes: a) the impact of large infrastructure constructions on the local populations as well as on the territory in which they are built; b) the risks and benefits they generate for the development of the region and the country. This is done by analyzing empirically the concept of “political opportunity structure” in relation to the political opportunities that arose for the action of the different social agents involved in the conflict over the construction of the hydroelectric power plant. In this analysis, it was found that within the actual political opportunity structure presented by the Brazilian energy policies, the groups that are against the construction of large infrastructure edifications, such as Belo Monte Hydroelectric Power Plant, and those that suffer the most with its direct and indirect impacts are also the ones with less power to influence the decision making processes and the outcomes of these constructions. In Belo Monte’s case, the contentious repertoires utilized by these agents were not able to generate mobilization with political power enough to change the construction and the operation schedules. This situation is also due to the cohesion and political power of the groups that support this kind of construction. The way these groups act gives them autonomy to decide about the course of the Brazilian energy policies and aim them for the continuity of projects of expanding the number of large hydroelectric power plants in the Brazilian Amazon rivers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright on works published in this journal rests with the author, with first publication rights for the journal. The content of published works is the sole responsibility of the authors. DMA is an open access journal and has adopted the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Not Adapted (CC-BY) license since January 2023. Therefore, when published by this journal, articles are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial) and adapt (remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial). You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made.
The contents published by DMA from v. 53, 2020 to v. 60, 2022 are protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.
DMA has been an open access journal since its creation, however, from v.1 of 2000 to v. 52 of 2019, the journal did not adopt a Creative Commons license and therefore the type of license is not indicated on the first page of the articles.

