Rights of indigenous peoples, legal pluralism and cultural defense in the criminal field. Reflections starting from the Mexican case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v64i3.67009Keywords:
Cultural Diversity. Criminal law. Rights of indigenous peoples. Legal pluralism. Cultural defense.Abstract
Several national constitutions and international legal instruments recognize the right to cultural diversity as a fundamental right. At the same time, in multicultural societies there is the possibility that individuals from different cultures consider, as licit, behaviors that are criminally sanctioned by the law of the state. It is therefore discussed whether the cultural factors which conditioned the behavior of the defendant should be taken into account in the assessment of her/his criminal responsibility, both in immigration contexts and in those states where there are indigenous peoples. Focusing on the second case, the article aims to verify the feasibility and the desirability of two possible means of recognition of cultural differences in the criminal field: legal pluralism and the cultural defense. To this purpose, it considers the example of how these means are configured in the Mexican legal order. It then discusses, in a more general and theoretical perspective, the “technical” challenges posed – at the legal, institutional and even socio-anthropological level – both by the constitution of a regime of legal pluralism and by the use of the cultural defense in state courts. Finally, the most recurrent normative arguments for and against cultural pluralism in the criminal field are subjected to critical examination. The analysis leads to the conclusion that, although the identification of possible “advanced balances” between respect for cultural differences and the protection of fundamental rights in the criminal field is a difficult goal to achieve, it is not, however, impossible a priori.
References
BASILE, F. (2008) Immigrazione e reati “culturalmente motivati”. Il diritto penale nelle società multiculturali europee. Milano: CUEM.
BENHABIB, S. (2002) The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press; trad. it., La rivendicazione dell’identità culturale. Eguaglianza e diversità nell’era globale. Bologna: il Mulino, 2005.
BERNARDI, A. (2006) Modelli penali e società multiculturale. Torino: Giappichelli.
BERNARDI, A. (2007) ‘L’ondivaga rilevanza penale del ‘fattore culturale’’, Politica del diritto, 38(1), págs. 3-48.
BREMS, E. (2017) ‘Legal Pluralism as a Human Right and/or as a Human Rights Violation’, en CORRADI, G., BREMS, E. y GOODALE M. (Coords.), Human Rights Encounter Legal Pluralism. Normative and Empirical Approaches. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, págs. 23-39.
CAMMARATA, R. (2010) ‘La Dichiarazione delle Nazioni Unite sui diritti dei popoli indigeni alla luce della cosmovisione Maya. Un successo e una sfida per i diritti umani’, Thule – Rivista italiana di studi americanistici, 26/29, págs. 91-113.
CAMMARATA, R. (2012) Indegno a chi? Diritti e discriminazioni allo specchio. Torino: Giappichelli.
CAMMARATA, R. (2017) ‘Differenze culturali e diritti fondamentali: le sfide del diritto, il ruolo della politica’, Notizie di Politeia, 128, págs. 111-114.
CARNEVALI, R. (2007) ‘El multiculturalismo: un desafío para el Derecho penal moderno’, Política Criminal, 3, A6, págs. 1-28.
CASTILLO ARA, A. (2014) ‘La ponderación de las valoraciones culturales en el error de prohibición’, Revista de Derecho (Valdivia), 27(2), págs. 243-267.
COLEMAN, D. L. (1996) ‘Individualizing Justice through Multiculturalism: The Liberals’ Dilemma’, Columbia Law Review, 96(5), págs. 1093-1167.
DE FRANCESCO, G. (2006) ‘Multiculturalismo e diritto penale nazionale’, en BERNARDI A. (Coord.), Multiculturalismo, diritti umani, pena. Milano: Giuffrè, págs. 137-163.
DE MAGLIE, C. (2010) I reati culturalmente motivati. Ideologie e modelli penali. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
FERRAJOLI, L. (2007) Principia iuris. Teoria del diritto e della democrazia. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
FERRAJOLI, L. (2018) Manifesto per l’uguaglianza. Laterza: Roma-Bari.
FERRER BELTRÁN, J. (2004) Prova e verità nel diritto. Bologna: il Mulino.
FERRETTI, M. P. (2004) ‘Tre modi di intendere le differenze culturali’, en RICCIARDI M. y DEL BO, C. (Coords.), Pluralismo e libertà fondamentali. Giuffrè: Milano, págs. 5-30.
FISCHER, M. (1998) ‘The Human Rights implications of a ‘Cultural Defense’’, Southern Carolina Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 6, págs. 663-702;
FOBLET, M.-C. y RENTELN, A. D. (Coords.) (2009) Multicultural jurisprudence. Comparative Perspectives on the Cultural Defense. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.
FOBLETS, M.-C. (1998) ‘Les délits culturels: de la répercussion des conflits de culture sur la conduite délinquante. Réflexions su l’apport de l’anthropologie du droit à un débat contemporain’, Droit et Culture, 35, págs. 195-222.
GIANFORMAGGIO, L. (2005) Eguaglianza, donne e diritto. Bologna: il Mulino.
GOLDING, M. P. (2002) ‘The Cultural Defense’, Ratio Juris, 15(2), págs. 146-158.
GRIFFITHS, J. (1986) ‘What is Legal Pluralism?’, The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 24, págs. 1-55.
HONIG, B. (1997) ‘Complicating Culture’, Boston Review, 22 [online]. Disponible en: http://bit.ly/36hrc3H (accedido: 10 de junio 2019).
HURTADO POZO, J. (2001) ‘El indígena ante el Derecho Penal: caso peruano’, en MORENO HERNÁNDEZ M. (Coord.), La ciencia penal en el umbral del siglo XXI, México, págs. 29-45. Disponible en: http://bit.ly/38ou0hy (accedido: 20 de mayo 2019).
LILLO, R. (2015) ‘Justicia penal y derechos indígenas. El largo camino del reconocimiento de la diversidad’, Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales, 28, págs. 99-115.
LÓPEZ BETANCOURT, E. y FONSECA LUJÁN, R.C. (2016) ‘El derecho penal frente a la interculturalidad en México’, Revista de investigación en Derecho, Criminológica y Consultoría Jurídica, 9(18), págs. 19-40.
LYMAN, J. C. (1986) ‘Cultural Defense: Viable Doctrine or Wishful Thinking?’, Criminal Justice Journal, 9(1), págs. 87-117.
MAUREIRA PACHECO, M. (2005) ‘Política criminal e indigenismo. Fundamentos jurídico-teórico de la política criminal indigenista’, Indiana, 22, págs. 189-213.
MAZZARESE, T. (1996) Forme di razionalità delle decisioni giudiziali. Torino: Giappichelli.
MAZZARESE, T. (2014) ‘El derecho a ser diversos en las sociedades multiculturales’, en DOUGLAS PRICE, J. y DUQUELSKY, D. (Coords.), Ponencias XXVII Jornadas Argentinas de Filosofía Jurídica y Social. Multiculturalismo, interculturalidad y derecho. Buenos Aires: Editorial Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos de la Nación, págs. 3-18.
MAZZARESE, T. (2018) ‘I migranti e il diritto ad essere diversi nelle società multiculturali delle democrazie costituzionali’, en CERRINA FERONI, G. y FEDERICO, V. (Coords.), Strumenti, percorsi e strategie dell’integrazione nelle società multiculturali. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, págs. 63-85.
MONTICELLI, L. (2003) ‘Le ‘cultural defenses’ (esimenti culturali) e i reati ‘culturalmente orientati’. Possibili divergenze tra pluralismo culturale e sistema penale’, Indice penale, 6(2), págs. 535-585.
OKIN, S. M. (1997) ‘Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?’, Boston Review, n. 22 [online]. Disponible en: http://bit.ly/38fvSsK. (accedido: 10 de junio 2019).
OLIVER, M. (1988) ‘Immigrant Crimes: Cultural Defense – A Legal Tactic’, L. A. Times, 15 de Julio, págs. 1, 30.
PAROLARI, P. (2011) ‘Delitos culturalmente motivados. Un nuevo desafío del multiculturalismo a los derechos fundamentales’, en NARVÁEZ HERNÁNDEZ J. R. (Coord.), Interpretación jurisprudencial. Memorias del II Simposio Internacional de Jurisprudencia. D.F. (México): Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, págs. 236-281.
PAROLARI, P. (2016) Culture, diritto, diritti. Diversità culturale e diritti fondamentali negli stati costituzionali di diritto. Torino: Giappichelli.
PAROLARI, P. (2018) ‘Migrazioni, interlegalità, pluralismo giuridico’, Rivista di Filosofia del diritto, 7(1), págs. 33-50.
PASTORE, Baldassare [2012], Impegni ermeneutici: il diritto e le tensioni del pluralismo culturale, en “Ars Interpretandi”, 1 (2012), págs. 41-58.
PÉREZ DE LA FUENTE, O. (2012) ‘Delitos culturalmente motivados. Diversidad cultural, derecho e inmigración’, European Journal of Legal Studies, 5(1), págs. 60-94.
PHILLIPS, A. (2003) ‘When Culture Means Gender: Issue of Cultural Defence in the English Courts’, The Modern law Review, 66, págs. 510-531.
POLLITT, K. (1997) ‘Whose Culture?’, Boston Review, n. 22 [online]. Disponible en: http://bit.ly/36jCLaC (accedido: 10 de junio 2019).
RENTELN, A. D. (2004) The Cultural Defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
RENTELN, A. D. (2010) The Cultural Defense: Challenging the Monocultural Paradigm, en FOBLETS, M.-C., GAUDREAULT-DESBIENS, J.-F. y RENTELN, A. D. (Coords.), Cultural Diversity and the Law. State Responses from Around the World. Bruxelles: Bruylant, págs. 791-817.
RUGGIU, I. (2012) Il giudice antropologo. Costituzione e tecniche di composizione dei conflitti multiculturali. Milano: Franco Angeli.
RUGGIU, I. (2017) ‘La cultura tra teoria dei diritti fondamentali e teoria del pluralismo giuridico’, Notizie di Politeia, 128, págs. 119-124.
SANZ MULAS, N. (2018) Los delitos culturalmente motivados, Valencia (ES): Editorial Tirant lo Blanch.
SEN, A. (2006) Identity and Violence. The Illusion of Destiny. New York-London: W.W. Norton &Company.
SHACHAR, A. (2001) Multicultural Jurisdictions. Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SHEYBANI, M.-M. (1987) ‘Cultural Defense: One Person's Culture Is Another's Crime’, Loyola Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal, 9(3), págs. 751-783.
SIKORA, D. W. (2001) ‘Differing Cultures, Differing Culpabilities? A Sensible Alternative: Using Cultural Circumstances as a Mitigating Factor in Sentencing’, Ohio State Law Journal, 62(5), págs. 1695-1728.
SOTOMAYOR ACOSTA, J. O. (1996) ‘La responsabilidad penal del indígena en Colombia. Entre el mundo real y el mundo posible’, Jueces para la democracia, 26, págs. 89-96.
TARUFFO, M. (1992) La prova dei fatti giuridici. Milano: Giuffrè.
UPRIMNY, R. (2011) ‘The Recent Transformation of Constitutional Law in Latin America: Trends and Challenges’, Texas Law Review, 89, págs. 1587-1609.
VALENZUELA REYES, M. (2003) ‘Derechos de los pueblos indígenas en el contexto internacional, especialmente en lo relativo a los aspectos penales’, Revista de Estudios Criminológicos y Penitenciarios, 6, págs. 9-36.
VAN BROECK, J. (2001) ‘Cultural Defence and Culturally Motivated Crimes (Cultural Offences)’, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 9(1), págs. 1-32.
VOLPP, L. (1994) ‘(Mis)identifying culture: Asian Women and the ‘Cultural Defense’’, Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 17, págs. 57-101.
YOUNG, C. (1992) ‘Equal Cultures – or Equality?’, Washington Post, 29 de Marzo, pág. C5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in the Journal agree to the following terms:
– Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence, allowing the work to be shared as long as proper credit is given to the authors and the initial publication in the Journal is acknowledged;
– Reusers must provide appropriate credit, include a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses the reuser or their use;
– Reusers may not apply additional restrictions, legal terms, or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits;
– Reusers must attribute credit to the creator and allow others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, exclusively for noncommercial purposes and under the same terms, in compliance with Brazilian Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, and other applicable regulations.
