MÉTODO(S) EM DIREITO COMPARADO

Autori

  • Deo Campos Dutra Faculdade Doctum - Juiz de Fora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v61i3.46620

Parole chiave:

Método. Metodologia. Direito comparado.

Abstract

O presente artigo tem como objetivo principal realizar a análise do método em direito comparado. Para isso, o texto percorre algumas etapas. A primeira delas consiste em recuperar o debate sobre o sentido e a importância da metodologia e do método no âmbito do direito. Em um segundo momento dedica-se a analisar o conceito de método em direito comparado e oferecer ao leitor um rol não taxativo dos métodos utilizados no âmbito da disciplina. Por fim, e com o intuito de apresentar uma nova perspectiva ao leitor, o artigo alinha-se com a posição que entende que o direito comparado não possui um único método de comparação mais adequado e eficaz. Ao contrário, entende-se que há uma pluralidade de métodos em direito comparado, que são complementares e que podem inclusive ser utilizados de forma concomitante, para que a pesquisa comparada possa ter resultados mais rigorosos. A escolha do(s) método(s) a ser(em) utilizado(s) torna-se, assim, uma livre e legítima opção do pesquisador, variável conforme seus interesses científicos.

Biografia autore

Deo Campos Dutra, Faculdade Doctum - Juiz de Fora

Doutor em Direito pela Université Paris Ouest Nanterre la Défense (Paris X) e pela PUC-Rio. Mestre em Ciências Jurídicas pela PUC-Rio. Pós-doutorando pela École Normale Supérieure – Paris. Professor e coordenador de pesquisa na Faculdade de Direito Doctum (Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil). E-mail: deo_campos@yahoo.com.br

Riferimenti bibliografici

ADAMS, Maurice. Doing What Doesn’t Come Naturally. On the Distinctiveness of Comparative Law. In: VAN HOECKE, Mark (Ed). Methodologies of Legal Research: Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011.

AGAMBEN, Giorgio. The Signature of All Things: On Method. Translated by Luca D’Isanto and Kevin Attell. New York: Zone, 2009.

BASEDOW, Jürgen. Comparative Law and its Clients. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 62, 2014, p. 821-857.

BELL, John. La comparaison en droit public. Melanges em l’honneur de Denis Tallon. Paris: Société de législation comparée, 1999.

BERCEA, Raluca. Tout comparaison des droits est une fiction. In: LEGRAND, Pierre. Comparer les droits résolument. Paris: PUF, 2009. p. 41-68.

BERGEL, J. L. Méthodologie Juridique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2001.

BOBBIO, Norberto. Metodo. In: Contributi ad um dizionario giuridico. Torino: Giappichelli Editore, 1994.

BONILLA MALDONADO, Daniel (Org.). Teoría del derecho y transplantes jurídicos. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores, Universidad de los Andes, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 2009.

BRAND, Oliver. Conceptual Comparisons: Towards a Coherent Methodology of Comparative Legal Studies. In: Brooklyn Journal of International Law, v. 32, Issue 2, 2007, p. 405-466.

BUSSANI, Mauro; MATTEI, Ugo. Making European Law. Essays on the «common» core project. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche, Trento, 2000.

CHAMPEIL-DESPLATS, Véronique. Méthodologies du Droit et des Sciences du Droit. Paris: Dalloz, 2014.

CHEVALLIER, J. Science administrative. Paris: LGDJ, 1978.

CONSTANTINESCO, L. J. Traité de droit comparé: La méthode comparative. Paris: LGDJ, 1974.

CORTEN, O. Méthodologie du droit international public. Bruxelles: Éditions de L’Université de Bruxelles, 2009.

DAVID, René. Os grandes sistemas do direito contemporâneo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002.

DELMAS-MARTY, Mireille. The Contribution of Comparative Law to a Pluralist conception of International Criminal Law. In: Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 1, 2003, p. 13.

DRAGO, R. Droit Comparé. In: ALLAND, D.; RIALS, S. (Org.). Dictionnaire de la culture juridique. Paris: PUF, 2003.

EBERLE, Edward J. The Method and Role of Comparative Law. In: Washington University Global Studies Law Review, v. 8, n. 3, 2009.

FAUVARQUE-COSSON, Bénédicte. Deux Siècles d’évolution du droit compare. Revue Internationale de Droit Compare, v. 63, n. 3, 2011, p. 527.

______. La réponse. In: Revue Internationale de Droit Compare, v. 55, 2003, p. 530-537.

______. Vers un Universalisme Renouvelé: Quelles em sont les Manifestations em Droit? In: Diogène, v. 219, 2007, p. 68-81.

FLETCHER, George P. Comparative Law as a Subversive Discipline. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 46, n. 4 (Autumn, 1998), p. 683-700.

FRÄNDBERG, Åke. Systematics of Legal Concepts. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 1987-31, p. 83-115.

FRANKENBERG, Günther. Comparing constitutions: Ideas, ideals and ideology – toward a layered narrative. In: International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 4, n. 3, 2006.

______. Critical Comparisons: Re-thinking Comparative Law. In: Harvard International Law Journal, v. 26, n. 2, 1985, p. 411-456.

______. How to do Projects with Comparative Law: Notes of an Expedition to the Common Core. In: MONATERI, Pier Giuseppe (Ed.). Methods of Comparative Law. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012.

______. Stranger than Paradise: Identity & Politics in Comparative Law. In: Utah Law Review, v. 259, 1997, p. 259-263.

GILROY, John Martin. A proposal for “Philosophical Method” in Comparative and International Law. In: Pace International Law Review, v. 1, 2009, p. 1-14.

GINSBURG, Tom; DIXON, Rosalind (Org.). Comparative Constitutional Law. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2011.

GLANERT, Simone. Method? In: MONATERI, Pier Giuseppe (Ed.). Methods of Comparative Law. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012, p. 61-81.

GLENN, H. Patrick. Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

GORDLEY, James. Comparative Law and Legal History. In: REIMANN, Mathias; ZIMMERMANN, Reinhard. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

GRAWITZ, Madelaine. Méthodes des Sciences Sociales. Paris: Dalloz, 2001.

HAGE, Jaap. Comparative Law as Method and the Method of Comparative Law. In: ADAMS, Maurice; HEIRBAUT, Dick (Ed.). The Method and Culture of Comparative Law. Essays in Honour of Mark Van Hoecke. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014.

HIRSCHL, Ran. The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law. American Journal of Comparative Law, n. 53, v. 123, 2005, p. 125-155.

HUG, Walther. The History of Comparative Law. In: Harvard Law Review, v. 45, n. 6, 1932, p. 1.027-1.070.

HUSA, Jaakko. Research Designs of Comparative Law – Methodology or Heuristics? The Journal of Comparative Law, v. 9, 2015.

JALUZOT. Béatrice. Méthodologie du droit comparé: bilan et prospective. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé, 2005, p. 29-48.

KISS, Alexandre Charles. Droit Comparé et Droit International Public. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé, v. 24, 1972, p. 5-12.

LARENZ, Karl. Metodologia da Ciência do Direito. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2014.

LEGRAND, Pierre. Comparer les droits, résolument. Paris: PUF, 2009.

______. Le Droit Comparé. Paris: PUF, 1999.

______; MUNDAY, Roderick. Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

LOSANO, Mario G. Os grandes sistemas jurídicos. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.

MATTEI, Ugo. Comparative Law and Economics. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1999.

______; MAMLYUK, Boris. Comparative International Law. In: Brooklyn International Journal, v. 36, 2011, p. 385-452.

MICHAELS, Ralf. The Functional Method of Comparative Law. In: REIMANN, Mathias; ZIMMERMANN, Reinhard. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 339-382.

MIRKINE-GUETZÉVITCH, Boris. Les méthodes d'étude du droit constitutionnel compare. In: Revue Internationale de Droit Compare, v. 1, n. 4, 1949, p. 397-417.

MONATERI, Pier Giuseppe (Ed.). Methods of Comparative Law. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012.

MUIR-WATT, Horatia. La function subversive du droit compare. Revue International de Droit Comparé, v. 52, n. 3, 2000, p. 503-527.

MÜLLER, Friedrich. Metodologia do Direito Constitucional. 4. ed. São Paulo: Editora dos Tribunais, 2010.

OBIORA, L. Amede. Toward an Auspicious Reconciliation of International and Comparative Analyses. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 43, 1998, p. 699-682.

OGUS, Anthony. Competition Between National Legal Systems: A Contribution of Economic Analysis to Comparative Law. In: International and Comparative Law Quarterly, v. 48, n. 2, 1999, p. 405-418.

ÖRÜCÜ, Esin. Developing Comparative Law. In: ÖRÜCÜ, E.; NELKEN, D. (Ed). Comparative Law: A Handbook. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007.

PLATSAS, Antonios Emmanuel. The Functional and the Dysfunctional in the Comparative Method of Law: Some Critical Remarks. In: Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, v. 12.3, 2008. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/bULfsW. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2016.

PONTHOREAU. Marie-Claire. Droit(s) constitutionnel(s) Comparé(s). Paris: Economica, 2010.

REIMANN, Mathias. Beyond National Systems: A comparative Law for the International Age. Tulane Law Rewiew, v. 75, 2001, p. 1.103-1.119.

______; ZIMMERMANN, Reinhard. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

ROBERTS, Anthea. Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating and Enforcing International Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, v. 60, 2011, p. 57-92.

ROSENFELD, Michel; SAJÓ, András (Org.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

SACCO, Rodolfo. La comparasion juridique au servisse de la connaissance du droit. Paris: Economica, 1991.

______. Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 39, n. 1, 1991, p. 1-34.

SAMUEL, Geoffrey. An Introduction to Comparative Law Theory and Method. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014.

______. Taking Methods Seriously (Part Two). In: Journal of Comparative Law, 2007.

SCHLESINGER, Rudolf. The Common Core of Legal Systems: An Emerging Subject of Comparative Study. Leyden: A.W. Sijthoff, 1961.

TUSHNET, Mark. Advanced Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014.

VALCKE, Catherine; GRELLETTE, Mathew. Three Functions of Function in Comparative Legal Studies. In: ADAMS, Maurice; HEIRBAUT, Dirk (Ed.). The Method and Culture of Comparative Law: Essays in Honour of Mark Van Hoecke. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014.

VAN HOECKE, Mark (Org.). Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004.

______ (Org.). Methodologies of Legal Research: What Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.

______. Methodology of Comparative Legal Research. 2014. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/dA2YSp. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2016.

VILLA, Vittorio. La science du droit. Paris: LGDJ, 1990.

ZWEIGERT, K.; KÖTZ, H. An Introduction to Comparative Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Pubblicato

2016-12-16

Come citare

Dutra, D. C. (2016). MÉTODO(S) EM DIREITO COMPARADO. Revista Da Faculdade De Direito UFPR, 61(3), 189 – 212. https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v61i3.46620

Fascicolo

Sezione

Artigos