The experience of joint custody of children: An integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v64i3.65531Keywords:
Joint custody. Family system. Parenting.Abstract
The joint custody of children has been subject of much discussion in academia as well as in society at large. This study aims to identify the main themes studied about the joint arrangement, and to describe the results of these investigations as well. To do so, a systematic review of the topic was carried out, considering the publications between 1990 and 2016. Through the search in the bases PsycINFO, SciELO and PePSIC, with reference to “guarda compartilhada” and “joint custody” descriptors, 219 articles were identified, which were reduced to 45, considering the existence of duplicate studies and the relevance of each to the outlined goal. The selected articles were fully read and later submitted to a content analysis. This analysis was made up of five thematic categories. The studies indicated that there are benefits of the arrangement for the family system, especially for the children, derived from their greater coexistence with both parents. Difficulties associated with the arrangement were identified, especially regarding the conflict between the parental pair and the implications of gender relations in this process. Joint custody is understood as an important alternative, although articles suggest that there is no ideal custody model, and that the particularities of each context and each family, their resources and interests, are more relevant than the arrangement itself.
References
ALEXANDRE, D. T.; VIEIRA, M. L. A influência da guarda exclusiva e compartilhada no relacionamento entre pais e filhos. Psicologia em Pesquisa, Juiz de Fora, v. 3, n. 2, p. 52-65, 2009. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2P3Twkx. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2018.
ALLEN, B. D.; NUNLEY, J. M.; SEALS, A. The Effect of Joint-Child-Custody Legislation on the Child-Support Receipt of Single Mothers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 1, p. 124-139, mar. 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10834-010-9193-4. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2Ptqn1a. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
ARDITTI, J. A. Differences between fathers with joint custody and noncustodial fathers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, [s. l.], v. 62, n. 2, p. 186-195, abr. 1992. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0079330. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/38l1T2K. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Ed. 70, 2011.
BASTAITS, K.; PONNET, K.; MORTELMANS, D. Parenting of Divorced Fathers and the Association with Children’s Self-Esteem. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, [s. l.], v. 41, n. 12, p. 1.643-1.656, dez. 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9783-6. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2s6uMiC. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
BAUSERMAN, R. Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole-custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 91-102, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.16.1.91. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/354BfJx. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
BERGSTRÖM, M.; FRANSSON, E.; HJERN, A.; KÖHLER, L.; WALLBY, T. Mental health in Swedish children living in joint physical custody and their parents’ life satisfaction: A cross‐sectional study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Linköping, v. 55, n. 5, p. 433-439, out. 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12148. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2P7ViRL. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
BERGSTRÖM, M.; FRANSSON, E.; MODIN, B.; BERLIN, M.; GUSTAFSSON, P. A.; HJERN, A. Fifty moves a year: is there an association between joint physical custody and psychosomatic problems in children? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, London, v. 69, n. 8, p. 769-774, ago. 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-205058. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2sc1sXK. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
BEYEA, S. C.; NICOLL, L. H. Writing an integrative review. AORN Journal, Denver, v. 67, n. 4, p. 877- 880, abr. 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)62653-7. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/38lyZj6. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
BINDER, R. L. American Psychiatric Association resource document on controversies in child custody: gay and lesbian parenting, transracial adoptions, joint versus sole custody, and custody gender issues. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Bloomfield, v. 26, n. 2, p. 267-276, jun. 1998. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/342Q3Hb. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2018.
BJARNASON, T.; ARNARSSON, A. M. Joint Physical Custody and Communication with Parents: A Cross-National Study of Children in 36 Western Countries. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Toronto, v. 42, n. 6, p. 871-890, 2011. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2DX7WN3. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2018.
BOTTERMAN, S.; SODERMANS, A. K.; MATTHIJS, K. The social life of divorced parents. Do custody arrangements make a difference in divorced parents’ social participation and contacts? Leisure Studies, [s. l.], v. 34, n. 4, p. 487-500, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2014.938768. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2LEkOvB. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
BRASIL. Lei 11.698, de 13 de junho de 2008. Altera os arts. 1.583 e 1.584 da Lei no 10.406, de 10 de janeiro de 2002 – Código Civil, para instituir e disciplinar a guarda compartilhada. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 16 jun. 2008. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2P5ggk2. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
BRASIL. Lei 13.058, de 22 de dezembro de 2014. Altera os arts. 1.583, 1.584, 1.585 e 1.634 da Lei no 10.406, de 10 de janeiro de 2002 (Código Civil), para estabelecer o significado da expressão “guarda compartilhada” e dispor sobre sua aplicação. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 24 dez. 2014. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/356W4nt. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
BRINIG, M. F.; FREDERICK, L. M.; DROZD, L. M. Perspectives on Joint Custody Presumptions as Applied to Domestic Violence Cases. Family Court Review, [s. l.], v. 52, n. 2, p. 271-281, abr. 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12090. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2t0GKuy. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
BRITO, L. M. T. de; GONSALVES, E. N. Guarda compartilhada: alguns argumentos e conteúdos da jurisprudência. Revista Direito GV, São Paulo, v. 9, n. 1, p. 299-317, jan./jun. 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1808-24322013000100011. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/36sJrDJ. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
CARLSUND, Å.; ERIKSSON, U.; LÖFSTEDT, P.; SELLSTRÖM, E. Risk behaviour in Swedish adolescents: is shared physical custody after divorce a risk or a protective factor? European Journal of Public Health, Utrecht, v. 23, n. 1, p. 3-8, fev. 2013. DOI: https://bit.ly/2Pz7Kci. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2rx5slE. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
CARLUCCI, A. K. La guarda compartida: una visión comparativa. Revista de Derecho Privado, Ciudad de México, edición especial, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas Unam, p. 231-286, 2012. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2P6gdUY. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2018.
COHEN, I. M. Postdecree Litigation Is Joint Custody to Blame? Family Court Review, [s. l.], v. 36, n. 1, p. 41-53, jan. 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.1998.tb00493.x. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2LEhIHU. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
CROSBIE-BURNETT, M. Impact of joint versus sole custody and quality of co-parental relationship on adjustment of adolescents in remarried families. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 4, p. 439-449, 1991. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370090407. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2PxAkui. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
CYR, F.; DI STEFANO, G.; DESJARDINS, B. Family Life, Parental Separation, and Child Custody in Canada: a Focus on Québec. Family Court Review, [s. l.], v. 51, n. 4, p. 522-541, out. 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12050. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2PqQoy5. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
DALTRO FILHO, H. F. Guarda compartilhada: realidade contemporânea para proteção dos interesses dos filhos. Revista Jurídica da Universidade de Cuiabá e Escola da Magistratura Mato-Grossense, Cuiabá, v. 2, p. 117-133, jan./dez. 2014. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/38oMBtF. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2018.
DEVREUX, A. A paternidade na França: entre igualização dos direitos parentais e lutas ligadas às relações sociais de sexo. Sociedade e Estado, Brasília, v. 21, n. 3, p. 607-624, set./dez. 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-69922006000300003. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2YvRBIx. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
DIFONZO, J. H. From the Rule of One to Shared Parenting: Custody Presumptions in Law and Policy. Family Court Review, [s. l.], v. 52, n. 2, p. 213-239, abr. 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12086. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2E2b8XG. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
FEINBERG, M. E. Coparenting and the transition to parenthood: A framework for Prevention. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 3, p. 173-195, set. 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1019695015110. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2qz4rcn. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
FORSSELL, A. M.; CATER, Å. Patterns in Child–Father Contact after Parental Separation in a Sample of Child Witnesses to Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of Family Violence, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 3, p. 339-349, abr. 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9673-2. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/356Mi4C. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
FRANSSON, E.; SARKADI, A.; HJERN, A.; BERGSTRÖM, M. Why should they live more with one of us when they are children to us both?: Parents’ motives for practicing equal joint physical custody for children aged 0–4. Children and Youth Services Review, [s. l.], v. 66, p. 154-160, jul. 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.05.011. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2Yy8L8A. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
FRIZZO, G. B.; KREUTZ, C. M.; SCHMIDT, C.; PICCININI, C. A.; BOSA, C. O conceito de coparentalidade e suas implicações para a pesquisa e para a clínica: implication for research and clinical practice. Journal of Human Growth and Development, São Paulo, v. 15, n. 3, p. 84-93, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19774. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/38fUeCR. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
GARWOOD, F. Divorce and conciliation in Sweden and Scotland. Mediation Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 4, p. 293-301, 1991. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crq.3890080406. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2PwfHyP. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
GEFFNER, R.; PAGELOW, M. D. Mediation and child custody issues in abusive relationships. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 151-159, 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370080207. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2YtN75h. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
GOLDRAJCH, D. Treinamento em habilidades com genitores em situação de guarda compartilhada. Revista Brasileira de Terapias Cognitivas, Campinas, v. 1, n. 1, p. 111-118, jan./jun. 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-5687.20050013. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2YC8MIr. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
GÓMEZ, M. R. V.; FERNÁNDEZ, C. G. A. La figura del padre en la família moderna. Cuadernos de Terapia Familiar, Madrid, v. 54, p. 101-122, 2003.
GRISARD FILHO, W. Guarda compartilhada: um novo modelo de responsabilidade parental. 4. ed. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2014.
GUNNOE, M. L.; BRAVER, S. L. The effects of joint legal custody on mothers, fathers, and children controlling for factors that predispose a sole maternal versus joint legal award. Law and Human Behavior, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 1, p. 25-43, fev. 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1005687825155. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/356NAfY. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
HARDESTY, J. L.; CHUNG, G. H. Intimate Partner Violence, Parental Divorce, and Child Custody: Directions for Intervention and Future Research. Family Relations, [s. l.], v. 55, n. 2, p. 200-210, abr. 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00370.x. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2Yv2c6u. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
HARDESTY, J. L.; GANONG, L. H. How women make custody decisions and manage co-parenting with abusive former husbands. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 4, p. 543-563, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407506065983. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/341jjOA. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
JAFFE, P. G.; CROOKS, C. V. Partner violence and Child Custody Cases: A Cross-National Comparison of Legal Reforms and Issues. Violence against women, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 8, p. 917-934, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801204266447. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2YwfLCy. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
JOHNSTON, J. R. Children’s Adjustment in Sole Custody Compared to Joint Custody Families and Principles for Custody Decision Making. Family Court Review, [s. l.], v. 33, n. 4, p. 415-425, out. 1995. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.1995.tb00386.x. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2s8Gw48. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
JUBY, H.; LE BOURDAIS, C.; MARCIL‐GRATTON, N. Sharing roles, sharing custody? Couples’ characteristics and children’s living arrangements at separation. Journal of Marriage and Family, Minneapolis, v. 67, n. 1, p. 157-172, fev. 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00012.x. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2YugXGC. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
KELLY, J. B. Current Research on Children’s Postdivorce Adjustment. Family Court Review, [s. l.], v. 31, n. 1, p. 29-49, jan. 1993. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.1993.tb00281.x. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/38quR1l. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
LÅFTMAN, S. B.; BERGSTRÖM, M.; MODIN, B.; ÖSTBERG, V. Joint physical custody, turning to parents for emotional support, and subjective health: A study of adolescents in Stockholm, Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, [s. l.], v. 42, n. 5, p. 456-462, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494814526798. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2t0y2wl. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
LAMELA, D.; FIGUEIREDO, B.; BASTOS, A. Perfis de vinculação, coparentalidade e ajustamento familiar em pais recém-divorciados: diferenças no ajustamento psicológico. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, Porto Alegre, v. 26, n. 1, p. 19-28, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-79722013000100003. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3513jgG. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
LEHMANN, R. B. Facultades y derechos compartidos respecto de los hijos: una mirada desde el Derecho comparado. Revista de Derecho, Coquimbo, v. 20, n. 1, p. 21-60, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-97532013000100002. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2RB88ts. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
LITTLE, M. A. The impact of the custody plan on the family: A five‐year follow‐up. Family Court Review, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 2, p. 243-251, abr. 1992. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.1992.tb01049.x. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/38m7iqb. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
LÓPEZ AZCONA, A. El tratamiento en Derecho Español de la custodia de los hijos menores en las crisis de pareja: la novedosa opción del legislador Aragonés por la custodia compartida. Iuris Tantum Revista Boliviana de Derecho, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, n. 19, p. 206-235, jan. 2015. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/36fJZwr. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2018.
LOWENSTEIN, L. F. Joint custody and shared parenting: Are courts listening? Family Therapy, [s. l.], v. 29, n. 2, p. 101-108, 2001.
MACCOBY, E. E.; BUCHANAN, C. M.; MNOOKIN, R. H.; DORNBUSCH, S. M. Postdivorce roles of mothers and fathers in the lives of their children. Journal of Family Psychology, [s. l.], 7, n. 1, p. 24-38, jun. 1993. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.7.1.24. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2LE7Eil. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
MADALENO, R.; MADALENO, R. Guarda compartilhada: física e jurídica. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2015.
MCINTOSH, J.; CHISHOLM, R. Cautionary notes on the shared care of children in conflicted parental separation. Journal of Family Studies, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 1, p. 37-52, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/jfs.327.14.1.37. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/36jqSSi. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
NIELSEN, L. Shared Parenting After Divorce: A Review of Shared Residential Parenting Research. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, Philadelphia, v. 52, n. 8, p. 586-609, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2011.619913. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2LC3MhO. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
NIELSEN, L. Shared Physical Custody: Summary of 40 Studies on Outcomes for Children. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, Philadelphia, v. 55, n. 8, p. 613-635, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2014.965578. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2YuJtrC. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
OPIE, A. Ideologies of Joint Custody. Family Court Review, [s. l.], v. 31, n. 3, p. 313-326, jul. 1993. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.1993.tb00307.x. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2LAExMG. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
PEARSON, J.; THOENNES, N. Custody after divorce: Demographic and attitudinal patterns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Crozet, v. 60, n. 2, p. 233-249, abr. 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0079166. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2LCdaSi. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
RAUB, J. M.; CARSON, N. J.; COOK, B. L.; WYSHAK, G.; HAUSER, B. B. Predictors of Custody and Visitation Decisions by a Family Court Clinic. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Bloomfield, v. 41, n. 2, p. 206-218, jun. 2013. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/38oc9ag. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2018.
ROSA, C. P. Nova Lei da Guarda Compartilhada. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2015.
SODERMANS, A. K.; BOTTERMAN, S.; HAVERMANS, N.; MATTHIJS, K. Involved Fathers, Liberated Mothers? Joint Physical Custody and the Subjective Well-being of Divorced Parents. Social Indicators Research, [s. l.], v. 122, n. 1, p. 257-277, maio 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0676-9. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/358zOti. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
SODERMANS, A. K.; MATTHIJS, K. Joint physical custody and adolescents’ subjective well-being: A personality × environment interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 3, p. 346-356, jun. 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036713. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2rtKAfg. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
STAUDT, A. C. P. Novos tempos, novos pais? O ser pai na contemporaneidade. 2007. 68 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Psicologia). – Faculdade de Psicologia, PUCRS, Porto Alegre, 2007.
STAUDT, A. C. P.; WAGNER, A. A vivência da paternidade em tempos de diversidade: uma visão transcultural. In: WAGNER, A. Desafios psicossociais da família contemporânea: pesquisas e reflexões. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2011.
VAN DER HEIJDEN, F.; POORTMAN, A.; VAN DER LIPPE, T. Children’s Postdivorce Residence Arrangements and Parental Experienced Time Pressure. Journal of Marriage and Family, Minneapolis, v. 78, n. 2, p. 468-481, abr. 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12283. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2t0xgiV. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
VANASSCHE, S.; SODERMANS, A. K.; MATTHIJS, K.; SWICEGOOD, G. Commuting between two parental households: The association between joint physical custody and adolescent wellbeing following divorce. Journal of Family Studies, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 2, p. 139-158, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/jfs.2013.19.2.139. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2E2RF9o. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
VER STEEGH, N.; GOULD‐SALTMAN, D. Joint Legal Custody Presumptions: A Troubling Legal Shortcut. Family Court Review, [s. l.], v. 52, n. 2, p. 263-270, abr. 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12089. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/38ocQQU. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
WARSHAK, R. A. Social science and parenting plans for young children: A consensus report. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 1, p. 46-67, fev. 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/law0000005. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/38nSesg. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal agree to the following terms:
– Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal right of first publication with the work licensed under the Creative Commons — Atribuição 3.0 Brasil — CC BY 3.0 BR Licence, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in the Journal;
– Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal;
– Any person is free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and to adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, but must give, in any case, appropriate credit, and provide a link to the license and indicate if changes were made, under the terms of the Creative Commons — Atribuição 3.0 Brasil — CC BY 3.0 BR Licence and in compliance with Brazilian Law No. 9,610, of February 19, 1998, and other regulations in force.
