SHOULD THE VALUE OF INTEGRITY BIND THE LEGISLATURE? AN ANALYSIS OF ANDREI MARMOR’S CRITICISM ON LEGISLATIVE INTEGRITY IN RONALD DWORKIN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v62i1.47835Keywords:
Integrity. Legislation. Dworkin. Marmor.Abstract
This essay intends to analyze the possibility of binding the legislature to the ideal of integrity defended by Ronald Dworkin. As this author asserts, political integrity should be applied both to the legislature to the judiciary, and in both cases, it is based on coherence. Against this view, we present Andrei Marmor’s opinion. Although Marmor does not deny the importance of coherence and integrity, he claims that the legislative branch cannot be bound by this political value. Finally, we introduce Jeremy Waldron’s view, which indirectly responds to Marmor and offers a defense of integrity.
References
BELLAMY, Richard. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1996.
DWORKIN, Ronald. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1985.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2011.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1986.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1977.
GUEST, Stephen. Ronald Dworkin. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012.
MARMOR, Andrei. Should We Value Legislative Integrity? In: BAUMAN, Richard W.; KAHANA, Tsvi (Org.). The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 125-139, 2006.
RAZ, Joseph. La ética en el ámbito público. Barcelona: Gedisa, 1994.
RAZ, Joseph. Practical Reason and Norms. 2. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
RAZ, Joseph. Speaking with One Voice: On Dworkinian Integrity and Coherence. In: BURLEY, Justine (Org.). Dworkin and his critics: With replies by Dworkin. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, p. 285-290, 2004.
WALDRON, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in the Journal agree to the following terms:
– Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence, allowing the work to be shared as long as proper credit is given to the authors and the initial publication in the Journal is acknowledged;
– Reusers must provide appropriate credit, include a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses the reuser or their use;
– Reusers may not apply additional restrictions, legal terms, or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits;
– Reusers must attribute credit to the creator and allow others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, exclusively for noncommercial purposes and under the same terms, in compliance with Brazilian Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, and other applicable regulations.
