A Self-Eating Snake: Half-truths in the Chilean Constituent Process and Lessons for The Content Moderation Debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v12i3.98172Palabras clave:
constituent process, constitutional interpretation, content moderation, social media, misinformationResumen
On December 18th, 2023, a statue of an Ouroboro —a snake eating its own tail— was placed in Chile's capital, symbolizing the country’s failed attempts at constitutional replacement. Despite 78% of initial support in 2019 to replace Pinochet’s constitution, two consecutive proposals were rejected in 2022 and in 2023. Social media played a dual role in this process, enabling citizen participation in constitutional politics and facilitating the spread of tendentious constitutional interpretations. Drawing on Chile’s experience and the most salient contested constitutional interpretations in the process, this article analyzes how the democratic and pluralistic openness of constitutional texts to diverse political visions was vulnerable to widespread accusations of misinformation. Constitutional interpretation is a political endeavor; thus, "half-truthful” interpretations —within constitutional bounds but used to promote a particular vote in the constituent plebiscite— resist standard content moderation approaches. The article structures a regulatory proposal that addresses these challenges without arbitrarily determining interpretative legitimacy or focusing on the content that social media platforms host. These findings and policy recommendations offer crucial lessons for future constituent processes worldwide and contribute to broader debates about content moderation in constitutional politics and the Latin American region.
Citas
ACKERMAN, Bruce. Constitutional Politics/Constitutional Law. The Yale Law Journal, v. 99, n. 3, p. 453–547, 1989.
ALLEN, Jennifer; MARTEL, Cameron; RAND, David G, Birds of a feather don’t fact-check each other: Partisanship and the evaluation of news in Twitter’s Birdwatch crowdsourced fact-checking program. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 1–19, 2022.
ATRIA, Fernando. La constitución tramposa. Santiago: LOM Ediciones, 2013.
ATRIA, Fernando. La forma del derecho. Madrid: Marcial Pons Ediciones Jurídicas, 2016.
ATRIA, Fernando. La hora del derecho: Los 'derechos humanos' entre la política y el derecho. Estudios Públicos, n. 91, p. 45–89, 2003.
ATRIA, Fernando. Viviendo Bajo Ideas Muertas: La Ley y la Voluntad del Pueblo, SELA (Seminario en Latinoamérica de Teoría Constitucional y Política) Papers, 2011. Available: at https://openyls.law.yale.edu/entities/publication/f91a0650-87fb-45ec-bd3f-0bdf0961628d. Accessed on: 4th November 2025.
BARRETT, Paul M.; HENDRIX, Justin; SIMS, Grant, Fueling The Fire: How Social Media Intensifies U.S. Political Polarization – And What Can Be Done About It. Available at: https://bhr.stern.nyu.edu/publication/fueling-the-fire-how-social-media-intensifies-u-s-political-polarization-and-what-can-be-done-about-it/. Accessed on: 4th November 2025
BARTLETT, John. Misinformation abounds as Chile prepares to vote on new constitution. The Guardian, 2022. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/aug/31/chile-new-constitution-vote-misinformation. Accessed on: 4th November 2025.
BASSET, Yann. Claves del rechazo del plebiscito por la paz en Colombia. Estudios Políticos, n. 52, p. 241–265, 2018.
BAUM, Matthew; LAZER, David; MELE, Nicco, Combating Fake News: An Agenda for Research and Action. Available at: https://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Combating-Fake-News-Agenda-for-Research-1.pdf. Accessed on 4th November 2025.
BENKLER, Yochai, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2006.
BENKLER, Yochai; FARRIS, Robert; ROBERTS, Hal. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. . New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
CADEM, 74% cree que las redes sociales deberían ser reguladas más estrictamente en cuanto al contenido que se publica, Cadem. Available at: https://cadem.cl/estudios/74-cree-que-las-redes-sociales-deberian-ser-reguladas-mas-estrictamente-en-cuanto-al-contenido-que-se-publica/. Accessed on: 17th January 2025.
CADEM, Plaza Pública Survey, Cadem. Available at: https://cadem.cl/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Plaza-Publica-430-Se-mantiene-diferencia-en-favor-del-rechazo-44-2pts-en-el-plebiscito-de-salida-vs-39-1pt-que-votaria-apruebo.pdf. Accessed on: 20th March 2024.
CAPLAN, Robyn, Content or Context Moderation?, Data & Society. Available at: https://datasociety.net/library/content-or-context-moderation/. Accessed on: 4th November 2025.
CHIARA, Sáez; PEÑA, Patricia; GARCÍA, Javier, Challenges for freedom of expression on the internet in social crisis contexts: The case of Chile (2019–2022). Journal of Digital Media & Policy, v. 14, special issue on Emerging Debates on Internet Platform Policy and Regulation in Latin America, p. 225–247, 2023.
CLAIRE, Wardle, Fake news. It’s complicated, Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/1st-draft/fake-news-its-complicated-d0f773766c79. Accessed on: 4th November 2025.
CONTRERAS, Pablo; LOVERA, Domingo. A constitued constituent process? Chile's failed attempt to replace Pinochet's constitution (2013-2019). Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito, v. 13, n. 3, p. 297–314, 2021.
CNN Chile, Servel cursa multa de $6 millones a Google por propaganda en el pasado plebiscito de salida, CNN. Available at: https://www.cnnchile.com/pais/servel-multa-google-propaganda-plebiscito-salida_20230925/. Accessed on: 4th November 2025.
CNN Chile, Kast es acusado de mentir en mensaje radial al decir que borrador de la Constitución “promueve aborto hasta los 9 meses”, CNN Chile. Available at: https://www.cnnchile.com/pais/felipe-kast-aborto-9-meses_20220622/. Accessed on: 3rd May 2024.
DATAVOZ; DERECHOS DIGITALES, Encuesta Información y Proceso Constituyente, Ciper. Available at: https://www.ciperchile.cl/wp-content/uploads/Presentación-de-Resultados-Derechos-Digitales-Marzo-2022.pdf. Accessed on: 25th July 2024.
DIRESTA, Renee. Invisible Rulers: The People Who Turn Lies into Reality. . New York: Public Affairs, 2024.
DUAN, Charles; GRIMMELMANN, James. Content Moderation on End-to-End Encrypted Systems: A Legal Analysis. Georgetown Law Technology Review, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1–92, 2024.
DURÁN, Patricio, La red social Twitter y el proceso constituyente: el caso de las cuentas anómalas, Ciper. Available at: https://www.ciperchile.cl/2020/10/17/la-red-social-twitter-y-el-proceso-constituyente-el-caso-de-las-cuentas-anomalas/. Accessed on: 4th November 2025
ECHEGOYEN, Maximiliano, “Republicanos rechazó el derecho a la casa propia”: #Engañoso, FastCheck. Available at: https://www.fastcheck.cl/2023/09/05/imagen-republicanos-rechazo-el-derecho-a-la-casa-propia-enganoso/. Accessed on 4th November 2025
EL LÍBERO, Siete medias verdades de la Guía Práctica del Borrador de la Convención, El Líbero. Available at: http://ellibero.cl/libero-constituyente/siete-medias-verdades-de-la-guia-practica-del-borrador-que-comenzo-a-repartir-la-convencion/. Accessed on: 16th January 2025.
FASTCHECK, Fotografía de Elisa Loncon dándole la mano a Augusto Pinochet: #Falso, FastCheck. Available at: https://www.fastcheck.cl/2021/07/05/fotografia-de-elisa-loncon-dandole-la-mano-a-augusto-pinochet-falso/. Accessed on: 3rd May 2024.
FERNÁNDEZ, Miriam; BELLOGÍN, Alejandro; CANTADOR, Iván, Analysing the Effect of Recommendation Algorithms on the Spread of Misinformation. ACM Web Science Conference, p. 1-11, 2024.
FINKEL, Eli; BAIL, Cristopher; CIKARA, Mina; et al. Political sectarianism in America. Science, v. 370, n. 6516, p. 533–536, 2020.
FLORES, Antonia; RODRÍGUEZ, Ariadna. ¿Las viviendas serán del Estado si gana el “Apruebo”? | FALSO, UDP. Available at: https://vergara240.udp.cl/las-viviendas-seran-del-estado-si-gana-el-apruebo-falso/. Accessed on: 3rd May 2024.
FRANKS, Mary Anne, The Free Speech Black Hole: Can the Internet Escape the Gravitational Pull of the First Amendment?, Knight First Amendment Institute. Available at: http://knightcolumbia.org/content/the-free-speech-black-hole-can-the-internet-escape-the-gravitational-pull-of-the-first-amendment. Accessed on: 17th December 2024.
FRANKS, Mary Anne, The cult of the constitution, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2019.
FRISCHMANN, Brett M.; BENESCH, Susan, Friction-In-Design Regulation as 21St Century Time, Place and Manner Restriction. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, v. 25, p. 376–447, 2023.
GADDE, Vijaya; BEYKPOUR, Kayvon, Additional steps we’re taking ahead of the 2020 US Election, X. Available at: https://blog.x.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/2020-election-changes. Accessed on: 18th December 2024.
GARCÍA-HUIDOBRO, Luis. Elite non-cooperation in polarized democracies: Constitution-making deferral, the entry referendum and the seeds of the Chilean failure. Global Constitutionalism, v. 13, n.1, p. 168-181, 2023.
GONZÁLEZ, María Fernanda. La «posverdad» en el plebiscito por la paz en Colombia. Nueva Sociedad, v. 269, p. 114–126, 2017.
GRIMMELMANN, James. Speech Engines. Minnesota Law Review, v. 98, p. 868–952, 2014.
GRIMMELMANN, James. The Virtues of Moderation. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, v. 17, n. 42, p. 42–110, 2015.
GRIMMELMANN, James, To Err Is Platform, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Available at: http://knightcolumbia.org/content/err-platform. Accessed on: 18th February 2024
HENRY, Emeric; ZHURAVSKAYA, Ekaterina; GURIEV, Sergei, Fact-checking reduces the propagation of false news in social networks, Center for Economic Policy Research. Available at: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/fact-checking-reduces-propagation-false-news-social-networks. Accessed on: 4th November 2025
HINSLIFF, Gaby, ‘The rapist is you!’: why a Chilean protest chant is being sung around the world, The Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/feb/03/the-rapist-is-you-chilean-protest-song-chanted-around-the-world-un-iolador-en-tu-camino. Accessed on: 4th November 2025.
HOOD, Christopher. Accountability and Transparency: Siamese Twins, Matching Parts, Awkward Couple? West European Politics, v. 33, n. 5, p. 989–1009, 2010.
HUANG, Justin T.; CHOI, Jangwon; WAN, Yuqin, Politically biased moderation drives echo chamber formation: An analysis of user-driven content removals on Reddit, 2024. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4990476. Accessed on: 4th November 2025.
JEONG, Sarah, The Internet of Garbage, [s.l.]: Vox Media, Inc., 2018.
KAST Felipe, Twitter. Available at: https://twitter.com/felipekast/status/1539401596693491714. Accessed on: 3rd May 2024.
KLONICK, Kate. The New Governors: The People, Rules, And Processes Governing Online Speech. Harvard Law Review, v. 131, p. 1598–1670, 2018.
KLONICK, Kate, TL;DR: Misinfo Motivated Reasoning, How to Improve Child Exploitation Tip Lines, and Jonathan Haidt’s Hype, Substack. Available at: https://klonick.substack.com/p/tldr-misinfo-motivated-reasoning. Accessed on: 4th November 2025.
LANDEMORE, Hélène. Inclusive Constitution-Making: The Icelandic Experiment. Journal of Political Philosophy, v. 23, n. 2, p. 166–191, 2015.
LANGVARDT, Kyle. Regulating Online Content Moderation. Georgetown Law Journal, v. 106, n. 5, p. 1353–1388, 2017.
LAURA, Romero, Former Twitter execs tell House committee that removal of Hunter Biden laptop story was a “mistake”, ABC News. Available at: https://abcnews.go.com/US/former-twitter-execs-house-committee-removal-hunter-biden/story?id=96979014. Accessed on: 20th January 2025.
LEVINSON, Sanford. Constitutional Faith. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2011.
MABOUDI, Tofigh; NADI, Ghazal P. Crowdsourcing the Egyptian Constitution: Social Media, Elites, and the Populace. Political Research Quarterly, v. 69, n. 4, p. 716–731, 2016.
CUBILLOS SIGALL, Marcela, Twitter. Available at: https://t.co/c9lzqropqM. Accessed on 3rd May 2024.
MEDINA, Francisco; NÚÑEZ-MUSSA, Enrique, Chile | Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, available at: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/es/digital-news-report/2023/chile. Accessed on: 24th February 2024.
MENDOZA, Marcelo; VALENZUELA, Sebastián; NÚÑEZ-MUSSA, Enrique; et al. A Study on Information Disorders on Social Networks during the Chilean Social Outbreak and COVID-19 Pandemic. Applied Sciences, v. 13, n. 9, p. 1–19, 2023.
MERRILL, Jeremy; OREMUS, Will, Five points for anger, one for a ‘like’: How Facebook’s formula fostered rage and misinformation, Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/10/26/facebook-angry-emoji-algorithm/. Accessed on: 4th November 2025.
META, Community Standards | Transparency Center, Meta. Available at: https://transparency.meta.com/policies/community-standards/. Accessed on: 20th January 2025.
MINA, An Xiao. Memes to Movements. Boston: Beacon Press, 2019.
MIRANDA, Elias; ECHEGOYEN, Maximiliano, Fact checking: Un 64% de las verificaciones sobre el proceso constituyente resultaron ser falsas, FastCheck. Available at: https://www.fastcheck.cl/2022/07/05/fact-checking-un-64-de-las-verificaciones-sobre-el-proceso-constituyente-resultaron-ser-falsas/. Accessed on: 7th May 2024.
MOLINA, Paula, La “brutal” desinformación sobre la nueva Constitución propuesta para Chile (y algunas de las confusiones más difundidas), BBC News Mundo. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-62245073. Accessed on: 19th of January of 2025.
NARAYANAN, Arvind, Understanding Social Media Recommendation Algorithms, Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Available at: http://knightcolumbia.org/content/understanding-social-media-recommendation-algorithms. Accessed on: 18th February 2024.
NEWTON, Casey, Meta surrenders to the right on speech, Platformer. Available at: https://www.platformer.news/meta-fact-checking-free-speech-surrender/. Accessed on: 20th January 2025.
ODDSDÓTTIR, Katrín. Iceland: The Birth of the World's First Crowd-Sourced Constitution? Cambridge International Law Journal, v. 3, n. 4, p. 1207–1220, 2014.
OLATE, Catalina; FERNÁNDEZ, Arlette, El derecho a la vivienda está consagrado en la propuesta de nueva Constitución, pero esto no significa que las casas serán del Estado, FactChecking. Available at: https://factchecking.cl/user-review/el-derecho-a-la-vivienda-esta-consagrado-en-la-propuesta-de-nueva-constitucion-pero-esto-no-significa-que-las-casas-seran-del-estado/. Accessed on: 3rd May 2024
NEIRA, Cristian, “Este es el caso más vergonzoso”: Atria acusa fake news de Francisco Orrego sobre derecho a vivienda. El Desconcierto. Available at: https://www.eldesconcierto.cl/nacional/2022/06/29/este-es-el-caso-mas-vergonzoso-atria-acusa-fake-news-de-francisco-orrego-sobre-derecho-a-vivienda.html. Accessed on: 3rd May 2024.
PADILLA, Fabián, El segundo proceso constitucional tuvo un 79% menos desinformación que el primer proceso — Fast Check, FastCheck. Available at: https://www.fastcheck.cl/2023/12/22/el-segundo-proceso-constitucional-tuvo-un-79-menos-desinformacion-que-el-primer-proceso/. Accessed on: 3rd May 2024.
PALACIOS, Jorge, “Hemos visto menos fake news”: la reflexión del Servel en relación con el plebiscito constitucional anterior, The Clinic. Available at: https://www.theclinic.cl/2023/12/11/hemos-visto-menos-fake-news-la-reflexion-del-servel-en-relacion-con-el-plebiscito-constitucional-anterior. Accessed on: 7th May 2024
PASQUALE, Frank. Six Horsemen of Irresponsibility. Maryland Law Review, v. 79, n. 1, p. 105–113, 2019.
PATHAK, Royal; SPEZZANO, Francesca; PERA, Maria Soledad. Understanding the Contribution of Recommendation Algorithms on Misinformation Recommendation and Misinformation Dissemination on Social Networks. ACM Transactions on the Web, v. 17, n. 4, p. 1–26, 2023.
PEÑA, Carlos, Columna de opinión: Interpretaciones tendenciosas, Emol. Available at: https://www.emol.com/noticias/Nacional/2022/07/15/1066976/cronica-constitucional-columna-de-opinion.html. Accessed on: 16th January 2025.
PEÑA, Carlos. Pensar el malestar: La crisis de octubre y la cuestión constitucional. . Santiago: TAURUS, 2020.
PENG, Kenny; GRIMMELMANN, James, Rescuing Counterspeech: A Bridging-Based Approach to Combating Misinformation, ArXiv. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12699. Accessed on: 4th November 2025.
PESCA, Mike, Little Miss Information, Pesca Profundities. Available at: https://mikepesca.substack.com/p/little-miss-information. Accessed on: 16th January 2025.
PIZARRO, Gabriela, ¿Perderé mi casa o mis fondos de pensiones con la nueva Constitución?, Ciper. Available at: https://www.ciperchile.cl/2022/07/26/perdere-mi-casa-o-mis-fondos-de-pensiones-con-la-nueva-constitucion/. Accessed on: 3rd May 2024.
PORTER, Jon, WhatsApp says its forwarding limits have cut the spread of viral messages by 70 percent, The Verge. Available at: https://www.theverge.com/2020/4/27/21238082/whatsapp-forward-message-limits-viral-misinformation-decline. Accessed on: 7th May 2024.
POZEN, David E; TALLEY, Eric L; NYARKO, Julian. A Computational Analysis of Constitutional Polarization. Cornell Law Review, v. 105, p. 1–84, 2019.
REUTERS, Brazil gives Meta 72 hours to explain changes to fact-checking program, CNN. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/10/americas/brazil-meta-fact-checking-program-intl/index.html. Accessed on: 17th January 2025.
RID, Thomas. Active Measures: The Secret History of Disinformation and Political Warfare. New York: Macmillan, 2020.
SANTANDER, Pedro; ELÓRTEGUI-GÓMEZ, Claudio; ALLENDE-CID, Héctor; et al. De la hegemonía digital a la derrota electoral: Majority illusion en el plebiscito constitucional chileno. Cuadernos.info, n. 53, p. 70–94, 2022.
SANTOS, Marcelo; BUSTAMANTE-PAVEZ, Guillermo; FLORES, Antonia; et al. Misleading content on encrypted platforms in Chile: WhatsApp vs. Telegram during constitutional elections. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, v. 16, n. 2, p. 197–216, 2024.
SCHIFF, Kaylyn Jackson; SCHIFF, Daniel S.; BUENO, Natália S. The Liar's Dividend: Can Politicians Claim Misinformation to Evade Accountability? American Political Science Review, v. 199, n.1, p. 71-90, 2025.
SELUME, Jorge, Tiempos mejores. Santiago: Planeta, 2024.
STATISTA, Redes sociales en Chile, Statista. Available at: https://es.statista.com/temas/10669/redes-sociales-en-chile/. Accessed on: 23rd of February 2024.
SUTEU, Silvia, A New Form of Direct Democracy: Constitutional Conventions in the Digital Era. Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper, n. 2014/39, 2014. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2511285. Accessed on: 4th November 2025
SUTEU, Silvia. Constitutional Conventions in the Digital Era: Lessons from Iceland and Ireland. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, v. 38, p. 251, 2015.
T13, Boric y fake news sobre derecho a vivienda: “No crean en las mentiras que circulan por internet", Teletrece. Available at: https://www.t13.cl/noticia/convencion-constitucional/politica/boric-y-fake-news-derecho-vivienda-no-crean-mentiras-circulan-internet-29-06-2022. Accessed on: 3rd May 2024.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, Musk’s X to be reinstated in Brazil after complying with Supreme Court demands, NPR. Available at: https://www.npr.org/2024/10/08/nx-s1-5146510/brazil-x-twitter-court-reinstated-elon-musk. Accessed on: 17th January 2025.
TRONCOSO, Francisco, Menciones de convencionales sobre fake news: desinformación de Fontaine sobre pensiones marcó «punto de inflexión» porque «permeó un medio tradicional», El Mostrador. Available at: https://www.elmostrador.cl/destacado/2022/06/25/menciones-de-convencionales-sobre-fake-news-desinformacion-de-fontaine-sobre-pensiones-marco-punto-de-inflexion-porque-permeo-un-medio-tradicional/. Accessed on: 20th March 2024
TUFEKCI, Zeynep. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2017.
TUSHNET, Mark, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press., 1999.
VALENZUELA, Sebastián, Académico UC: En este proceso constituyente ha habido menos desinformación que en el anterior, Cooperativa.cl. Available at: https://cooperativa.cl/noticias/pais/politica/constitucion/academico-uc-en-este-proceso-constituyente-ha-habido-menos/2023-12-06/171719.html. Accessed on: 7th May 2024.
VALENZUELA, Sebastián; HALPERN, Daniel; KATZ, James E.; et al. The Paradox of Participation Versus Misinformation: Social Media, Political Engagement, and the Spread of Misinformation. Digital Journalism, v. 7, n. 6, p. 802–823, 2019.
VAN BAVEL, Jay J.; RATHJE, Steve; HARRIS, Elizabeth; et al. How social media shapes polarization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, v. 25, n. 11, p. 913–916, 2021.
VILLEGAS, Alexander, Chile enfrenta una avalancha de “medias verdades” a días del plebiscito constitucional, euronews. Available at: https://es.euronews.com/2022/08/29/chile-constitucion. Accessed on: 16th January 2025.
VOSOUGHI, Soroush; ROY, Deb; ARAL, Sinan. The spread of true and false news online. Science, v. 359, n. 6380, p. 1146–1151, 2018.
WALDMAN, Ari Ezra. Disorderly Content. Washington Law Review, v. 97, n. 4, p. 907–976, 2021.
WALDMAN, Ari Ezra. The Marketplace of Fake News. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 20, n. 4, p. 845–870, 2018.
WU, Felix T. Collateral Censorship and the Limits of Intermediary Immunity. Notre Dame Law Review, v. 87, n. 1, p. 293–350, 2011.
WALDRON, Jeremy, The Dignity of Legislation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
ZULUETA-FÜLSCHER, Kimana, How Constitution-making Fails and What We Can Learn from It: Discussion Paper 2/2023, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA). Available at: https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/how-constitution-making-fails-and-what-we-can-learn. Accessed on: 4th November 2025.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 José Acevedo Mundaca

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Autores mantienen los derechos autorales y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo simultáneamente licenciado bajo la Creative Commons - Atribución 4.0 Internacional que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Autores tienen autorización para asumir contratos adicionales separadamente, para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (ej.: publicar en repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Autores tienen permiso y son estimulados a publicar y difundir su trabajo online (ej.: en repositorios institucionales o en su página personal) a cualquier punto antes o durante el proceso editorial, ya que esto puede generar alteraciones productivas, así como aumentar el impacto y la citación del trabajo publicado (Véase El Efecto del Acceso Libre).




















