Law, democracy and Deleuze/Guattari’s political philosophy: Questions and possibilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v63i2.57920Keywords:
Deleuze. Guattari. Law. Democracy.Abstract
This article intends to develop a possible opening within the political philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari to make possible a theoretical reflection on law and democracy. As mentioned by Philippe Mengue, an initial problem is that the political philosophy proposed by the authors makes quite averse remarks on democracy and does not express an interest on the legal realm. Taking as our starting point the questions articulated by Mengue regarding a possible incompatibility between Deleuze/Guattari philosophy and democracy, the article points out that Mengue ignores a few potentialities inscribed in that philosophy that would allow us to rethink law and democracy within the political assumptions and concepts of Deleuze and Guattari’s philosophy. The interpretation presented by this research is directly influenced by the reading of a few Deleuze scholars, such as Paul Patton, and the works of Deleuze and Guattari themselves, Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? and Mille Plateaux. This article sustains that there is room to think law and democracy from the perspective of the authors when one thinks the political as immanent and guided by conceptual construction of new forms of social life.
References
CHESTERMAN, Simon. Violence in the name of human rights. In: DOUZINAS, Costas; GEARTY, Conor. The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
COLEBROOK, Claire. Legal Theory after Deleuze. In: BRAIDOTTI, Rosi; COLEBROOK, Claire; HANAFIN, Patrick. Deleuze and Law: Forensic Futures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, p. 6-23.
COLEBROOK, Claire. Pragmatic Rights. Law and Critique, v. 26, p. 155-171, 2015.
DELEUZE, Gilles. Negotiations. Columbia: Columbia University Press, 1995.
DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Félix. Mil Platôs, v. 3. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2004.
DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Félix. Mil Platôs, v. 5. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2008.
DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Félix. What is Philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
GARO, Isabelle. Molecular Revolutions: The Paradox of Politics in the Work of Gilles Deleuze. In: BUCHANAN, Ian; THOBURN, Nicholas. Deleuze and Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008, p. 54-73.
LEFEBVRE, Alexandre. Human Rights in Deleuze and Bergson’s Later Philosophy. In: SUTTER, Laurent de; MCGEE, Kyle. Deleuze and Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012, p. 48-68.
LEFEBVRE, Alexandre. The Image of Law: Deleuze, Bergson, Spinoza. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2008.
MENGUE, Philippe. Deleuze et la question de la démocratie. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2003.
MUSSAWIR, Edward. Jurisdiction in Deleuze: The Expression and Representation of Law. London: Routledge, 2011.
OLIVIER, Bert. Signs of Radical Democracy – Deleuze, Badiou, Rancière and Tahrir Square. Theoria, v. 61, n. 2, junho/2014, p. 1-21.
PATTON, Paul. Deleuze and Democracy. Contemporary Political Theory, v. 4, 2005, p. 400-413.
PATTON, Paul. Deleuzian Concepts: Philosophy, Colonization, Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.
RANCIÈRE, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
SCHUILENBURG, Marc. Institutions and Interactions: On the Problem of the Molecular and Molar. In: SUTTER, Laurent de; MCGEE, Kyle. Deleuze and Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012. p. 111-131.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in the Journal agree to the following terms:
– Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence, allowing the work to be shared as long as proper credit is given to the authors and the initial publication in the Journal is acknowledged;
– Reusers must provide appropriate credit, include a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses the reuser or their use;
– Reusers may not apply additional restrictions, legal terms, or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits;
– Reusers must attribute credit to the creator and allow others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, exclusively for noncommercial purposes and under the same terms, in compliance with Brazilian Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, and other applicable regulations.
