Law, democracy and Deleuze/Guattari’s political philosophy: Questions and possibilities

Authors

  • Leonardo Monteiro Crespo de Almeida Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v63i2.57920

Keywords:

Deleuze. Guattari. Law. Democracy.

Abstract

This article intends to develop a possible opening within the political philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari to make possible a theoretical reflection on law and democracy. As mentioned by Philippe Mengue, an initial problem is that the political philosophy proposed by the authors makes quite averse remarks on democracy and does not express an interest on the legal realm. Taking as our starting point the questions articulated by Mengue regarding a possible incompatibility between Deleuze/Guattari philosophy and democracy, the article points out that Mengue ignores a few potentialities inscribed in that philosophy that would allow us to rethink law and democracy within the political assumptions and concepts of Deleuze and Guattari’s philosophy. The interpretation presented by this research is directly influenced by the reading of a few Deleuze scholars, such as Paul Patton, and the works of Deleuze and Guattari themselves, Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? and Mille Plateaux. This article sustains that there is room to think law and democracy from the perspective of the authors when one thinks the political as immanent and guided by conceptual construction of new forms of social life.

Author Biography

Leonardo Monteiro Crespo de Almeida, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)

Doutor em Direito pela Faculdade de Direito do Recife/UFPE. Mestre em Direito pela Faculdade de Direito do Recife/UFPE. Bacharel em Filosofia pela UFPE.

References

CHESTERMAN, Simon. Violence in the name of human rights. In: DOUZINAS, Costas; GEARTY, Conor. The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

COLEBROOK, Claire. Legal Theory after Deleuze. In: BRAIDOTTI, Rosi; COLEBROOK, Claire; HANAFIN, Patrick. Deleuze and Law: Forensic Futures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, p. 6-23.

COLEBROOK, Claire. Pragmatic Rights. Law and Critique, v. 26, p. 155-171, 2015.

DELEUZE, Gilles. Negotiations. Columbia: Columbia University Press, 1995.

DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Félix. Mil Platôs, v. 3. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2004.

DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Félix. Mil Platôs, v. 5. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2008.

DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Félix. What is Philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.

GARO, Isabelle. Molecular Revolutions: The Paradox of Politics in the Work of Gilles Deleuze. In: BUCHANAN, Ian; THOBURN, Nicholas. Deleuze and Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008, p. 54-73.

LEFEBVRE, Alexandre. Human Rights in Deleuze and Bergson’s Later Philosophy. In: SUTTER, Laurent de; MCGEE, Kyle. Deleuze and Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012, p. 48-68.

LEFEBVRE, Alexandre. The Image of Law: Deleuze, Bergson, Spinoza. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2008.

MENGUE, Philippe. Deleuze et la question de la démocratie. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2003.

MUSSAWIR, Edward. Jurisdiction in Deleuze: The Expression and Representation of Law. London: Routledge, 2011.

OLIVIER, Bert. Signs of Radical Democracy – Deleuze, Badiou, Rancière and Tahrir Square. Theoria, v. 61, n. 2, junho/2014, p. 1-21.

PATTON, Paul. Deleuze and Democracy. Contemporary Political Theory, v. 4, 2005, p. 400-413.

PATTON, Paul. Deleuzian Concepts: Philosophy, Colonization, Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.

RANCIÈRE, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.

SCHUILENBURG, Marc. Institutions and Interactions: On the Problem of the Molecular and Molar. In: SUTTER, Laurent de; MCGEE, Kyle. Deleuze and Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012. p. 111-131.

Published

2018-08-31

How to Cite

Almeida, L. M. C. de. (2018). Law, democracy and Deleuze/Guattari’s political philosophy: Questions and possibilities. Revista Da Faculdade De Direito UFPR, 63(2), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v63i2.57920

Issue

Section

Artigos