HERMENEUTIC DISTINCTIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF CIVIL LAW: THE INTERPRETER IN THE DOCTRINE OF PIETRO PERLINGIERI

Authors

  • Carlos Nelson Konder Rio de Janeiro State University (Uerj), Rio de Janeiro - RJ.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v60i1.38442

Keywords:

Civil Law. Constitutionalization. Hermeneutics. Interpretation. Methodology.

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the methodology of constitutionalization of the civil law by Pietro Perlingieri, sometimes referred to as “civil-constitutional law”, through the comparison of this method with others, thus establishing relations, distinctions, similarities, and sometimes opportunities for dialogue. For this purpose, was used the methods’ response technique regarding two questions about interpretation of law: deontology x teleology and restriction x freedom of interpretation.

Author Biography

Carlos Nelson Konder, Rio de Janeiro State University (Uerj), Rio de Janeiro - RJ.

Doutor e mestre em Direito Civil pela Uerj. Especialista em Direito Civil pela Universidade de Camerino (Itália). Professor Adjunto de Direito Civil da Uerj e da PUC-Rio.

Published

2015-04-06

How to Cite

Konder, C. N. (2015). HERMENEUTIC DISTINCTIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF CIVIL LAW: THE INTERPRETER IN THE DOCTRINE OF PIETRO PERLINGIERI. Revista Da Faculdade De Direito UFPR, 60(1), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v60i1.38442

Issue

Section

Artigos