HERMENEUTIC DISTINCTIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF CIVIL LAW: THE INTERPRETER IN THE DOCTRINE OF PIETRO PERLINGIERI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v60i1.38442Keywords:
Civil Law. Constitutionalization. Hermeneutics. Interpretation. Methodology.Abstract
This paper aims to examine the methodology of constitutionalization of the civil law by Pietro Perlingieri, sometimes referred to as “civil-constitutional law”, through the comparison of this method with others, thus establishing relations, distinctions, similarities, and sometimes opportunities for dialogue. For this purpose, was used the methods’ response technique regarding two questions about interpretation of law: deontology x teleology and restriction x freedom of interpretation.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in the Journal agree to the following terms:
– Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence, allowing the work to be shared as long as proper credit is given to the authors and the initial publication in the Journal is acknowledged;
– Reusers must provide appropriate credit, include a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses the reuser or their use;
– Reusers may not apply additional restrictions, legal terms, or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits;
– Reusers must attribute credit to the creator and allow others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, exclusively for noncommercial purposes and under the same terms, in compliance with Brazilian Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, and other applicable regulations.
