BRIEF REFLECTIONS ON THE RIGHTS TO PROOF AND TO ILLEGAL PROOF IN THE PROJECT OF THE BRAZILIAN NEW CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v59i2.37122Keywords:
Illegal evidence. New Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure. Principle of reasonableness. Theory of the fruit of the poisonous tree. The right to proof.Abstract
This study is a critical reflection on the suppression, at the General Report of senator Valter Pereira, of the sole paragraph of the article 257 of the Bill Project nº 166/2010 (Senate). The matter regarding this paragraph was later treated in the article 353 of the Bill Project nº 8046/2010 (Chamber of Deputies), which aims to establish the new Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure. Based on the analysis of item LVI, Article 5 of the Constitution, from the perspective of the theories of illegal evidence and of the fruit of the poisonous tree, and from the principle of reasonableness (theories and principle upheld by the superior courts and applied in Brazilian law), this paper analyzes the relativization of the illegal evidence concept, of personal rights and other fundamental rights. The cited theories are not absolute; they can be tempered, not being, moreover, incompatible with the application of the principle of reasonableness, according to Brazilian law. The suppressed paragraph could make it possible to relativize the current rigorous rejection of illegal evidence, restoring to the judge the role of considering, on a case-by-case basis, the principles, rights of personality and fundamental rights, together with how evidences are raised within the specific circumstances of the case, so determining if the evidence can be admitted or not. The removal of the article in question translates into a hasty and thoughtless act of our lawmakers, which can deprive the parties of adequate protection in the event of violation of a higher moral law.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal agree to the following terms:
– Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal right of first publication with the work licensed under the Creative Commons — Atribuição 3.0 Brasil — CC BY 3.0 BR Licence, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in the Journal;
– Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the Journal;
– Any person is free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and to adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, but must give, in any case, appropriate credit, and provide a link to the license and indicate if changes were made, under the terms of the Creative Commons — Atribuição 3.0 Brasil — CC BY 3.0 BR Licence and in compliance with Brazilian Law No. 9,610, of February 19, 1998, and other regulations in force.