BETWEEN LAW, POLITICS AND ECONOMICS: (RE)CONSTRUCTING THE COMPARATIVE INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v59i2.35183Keywords:
Comparative institutional analysis. Decision-making processes. Public policies.Abstract
Law, economics, and politics, seen in a primarily institutional perspective, are the main structures that make up the state system. This paper seeks to analyze, by adopting comparative institutional analysis, the complex tissue of decision-making processes, aiming to define the most suitable institution to implement a determined public policy, through an adaptation, for the national scene, of the model developed by Neil Komesar in Imperfect alternatives: choosing institutions in law, economics and public policy.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in the Journal agree to the following terms:
– Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence, allowing the work to be shared as long as proper credit is given to the authors and the initial publication in the Journal is acknowledged;
– Reusers must provide appropriate credit, include a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses the reuser or their use;
– Reusers may not apply additional restrictions, legal terms, or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits;
– Reusers must attribute credit to the creator and allow others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, exclusively for noncommercial purposes and under the same terms, in compliance with Brazilian Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, and other applicable regulations.
