Autonomic obstetric nursing
experiences and responsibilities related to the construction of the prenatal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/ce.v30i0.99121ptKeywords:
Women's Health, Pregnancy, Maternal-Fetal Relations, Nursing Care, Maternal-Child NursingAbstract
Objective: Understand the construction of the prenatal by autonomous obstetric nurses, considering their experiences, challenges and professional learning.
Method: Descriptive study with a qualitative approach, in which participated seven autonomous obstetric nurses from different regions of Brazil, with at least one year of practice. Data collection took place in September 2024, followed by transcription and analysis of the interviews in November 2024. The data, obtained through online interviews, were transcribed and interpreted through content analysis.
Results: It was observed that the follow-up provided by obstetric nurses prioritizes the woman, values her individuality, transmits information effectively and positively impacts pregnancy, with evidence-based behaviors.
Conclusion: This study contributes to the legitimate struggle for the valuation of the professionals in question, by recognizing experiences that show significant results in relation to the prenatal care performed effectively.
References
1. Duarte MR, Alves VH, Rodrigues DP, de Souza KV, Pereira AV, Pimentel MM. Care technologies in obstetric nursing: contribution for the delivery and birth. Cogitare Enferm [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Oct 4];24:e54164. Available from: doi.org/10.5380/ce.v24i0.54164
2. Duarte BA, Temoteo RCA. O uso do plano de parto por mulheres durante o pré-natal: scoping review. Rev Enferm Atual In Derme [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Oct 4];97(2): e023049. Available from: https://revistaenfermagematual.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1439
3. Lima KSO, Bezerra TB, Pinto AGA, Quirino GS, Sampaio LRL, Cruz RSBLC. The nurse's role in the pregnancy-puerperal cycle: postpartum women' s perception in the light of Peplau’s theory. Cogitare Enferm [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 4];29:e95829. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/ce.v29i0.95829
4. Ferreira RN, Vargas MAO, Velho MB, Zocche DAA, Rabelo M, Nhime ASS. Professional identity and limitation of autonomy of the Obstetric Nurse in a teaching hospital: a qualitative study. Esc Anna Nery [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jul 9];28:e20240064. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2024-0064en
5. Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 14. ed. São Paulo: Hucitec Editora; 2014. 416 p.
6. Sionek L, Assis DTM, Freitas JL. “If I had known, I wouldn’t have come”: implications and challenges of qualitative interview. Psicol Est [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Sep 2];25:e44987. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v25i0.44987
7. Dalla Valle PR, Ferreira JL. Análise de conteúdo na perspectiva de Bardin: contribuições e limitações para a pesquisa qualitativa em educação. Versão 1. SciELO Preprints [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jul 10]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.7697
8. Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo.. São Paulo: Edições 70; 2016. 288 p.
9. Conselho Federal de Enfermagem (COFEN). Resolução COFEN nº 685/2022 – revogada pela Resolução COFEN nº 782/2025. Institui a concessão de Anotação de Responsabilidade Técnica nos Serviços de Enfermagem prestados de forma autônoma e/ou liberal. Diário Oficial da União [Internet]. 2022 Feb 2 [cited 2025 Jul 10];160(23 Seção 1):109. Available from: https://www.cofen.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Resolucao-685-2022.pdf
10. Belarmino AC, Rodrigues MENG, Rodrigues PL, Vieira LJES, dos Anjos SJSB, Ferreira Júnior AR. Challenges of management and care in normal birth centers: qualitative study with obstetric nurses. Cogitare Enferm [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Oct 16];29:e93690. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/ce.v29i0.93690
11. Conselho Federal de Enfermagem (COFEN). Resolução n. 737, de 02 fevereiro 2024. normatiza a atuação do enfermeiro obstétrico e obstetriz na assistência à mulher, recém-nascido e família no parto domiciliar planejado. Diário Oficial da União [Internet]. 2024 Feb 5 [cited 2025 Jul 10];162(25 Seção 1):154-5. Available from: https://www.cofen.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Publicacao-D.O.U.-Resolucao-737-2024.pdf
12. de Loiola AMR, Alves VH, Vieira BDG, Rodrigues DP, de Souza KV, Marchiori GRS. Delivery plan as a care technology: experience of women in the postpartum period in a birth center. Cogitare Enfermagem [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Nov 1];25:e66039. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v25i0.66039
13. Rocha NFF, Ferreira J. A escolha da via de parto e a autonomia das mulheres no Brasil: uma revisão integrativa. Saúde Debate [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Nov 1];44(125):556-68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104202012521
14. dos Santos FAPS, Enders BC, de Brito RS, de Farias PHS, Teixeira GA, Dantas DNA, et al. Autonomy for obstetric nurse on low-risk childbirth care. Rev Bras Saúde Mater Infant [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Nov 1];19(2):471-479. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042019000200012
15. Bachilli MC, Zirbel I, HelenaRelational autonomy and humanized birth:
the challenge of approaching desires and
practices in the SUS. Physis [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 14];31(1):e310130. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/physis/a/TQCjFwqYx7YLZwSZGtTsrzB/?format=pdf&lang=en
16. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria n. 353 de 14 de fevereiro de 2017. Aprova as Diretrizes Nacionais de Assistência ao Parto Normal. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2017 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/sas/2017/prt0353_14_02_2017.html
17. Montelaro PK, Cirelli JF. Corpos em relação: contribuições das epistemologias feministas para uma prática obstétrica situada. Saúde Debate [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 14];45(spe1):168-80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042021E113
18. de Almeida AP, Naffah Neto A. A teoria do desenvolvimento maturacional de Winnicott: novas perspectivas para a educação. Rev Latinoam Psicopat Fund [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 14];24(3):571-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1415-4714.2021v24n3p517-3
19. de Brito JGE, Santos JMJ, Barreiro MSC, Dantas DS, Leite AM, Mendes RB. Participation of the pregnant woman 's partner in pre-natal consultations: prevalence and associated factors. Cogitare Enferm [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 14];26:e75169. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v26i0.75169
20. Cassiano AN, de Menezes RMP, de Medeiros SM, Silva CJA, de Lima MCRAA. Performance of nurse-midwives from the perspective of epistemologies of the South. Esc Anna Nery [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 14];25(1):e20200057. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2020-0057
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Carine Amabile Guimarães, Vanessa de Souza Aquino

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cogitare Enfermagem reserves the right to make normative, orthographic, and grammatical changes to the published article to maintain the cultured standard of the language, while respecting the authors' style.
The published study is the sole responsibility of the author(s), and Cogitare Enfermagem is exclusively responsible for evaluating the manuscript as a scientific publication vehicle. Revista Cogitare Enfermagem is not responsible for any violations of Law No. 9,610/1998, the Brazilian Copyright Law.
Cogitare Enfermagem allows the author to hold the copyright of articles accepted for publication, without restrictions.
The articles published are licensed under the Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0 Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0 - The attribution adopted by Cogitare Enfermagem is permitted:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any media or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution - You must give proper credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes have been made. You may do this in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests that the licensor endorses it or approves of its use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing something that the license allows.



















