SPECIES-SPECIFIC PCR FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF SPOROTRICHOSIS CAUSED BY SPOROTHRIX BRASILIENSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v26i3.76496Keywords:
endemic mycoses, feline sporotrichosis, molecular diagnosis, subcutaneous mycoses, zoonosisAbstract
Despite thousands of sporotrichosis cases related to the zoonotic transmission of Sporothrix brasiliensis have been described, the diagnostic gold standard is still the classical culturing methods. The mycological culture results are available after
seven to 30 days of incubation. Since an early diagnosis contributes to improving the
treatment and to the spread control of this mycosis, studies evaluating faster diagnostic
methods are needed. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the species-specific PCR for the
sporotrichosis diagnosis caused by S. brasiliensis, using samples collected with a noninvasive technique. Seventy-four swabs from feline (n=64), canine (n=5), and human
(n=5) suspect sporotrichosis cases were included. All samples were submitted to classical
methods for diagnosis and to S. brasiliensis-specific PCR. Using mycological culture as
the gold standard, the diagnosis of S. brasiliensis-caused infection was confirmed in 69%
(51/74) of the cases. PCR was positive in 30 out of these 51 cases, showing 59%
sensitivity, 100% specificity, 72% accuracy, 100% positive predictive value, and 52%
negative predictive value. Consequently, more studies are needed to elucidate the
interference factors that culminated with the high rate of false-negative results and then
optimize this molecular test for the accurate diagnosis of infections caused by S.
brasiliensis.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors that wish to publish in AVS agree with the following conditions:
- To keep copyright of the article and allow the AVS to publish the first time. The article will be licensed by Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional allowing the sharing of their work.
- Authors may distribute their work by other channel of distribution (ex.: local or public repository).
- Authors have the permission to publish their work online, using different channels (similar to above), even before the final editorial process.











