Beyond Invalidation: Unorthodox Forms of Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments and Constitution-amending Case Law in Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v9i2.86742Keywords:
judicial review, constitutional amendments, unorthodox judicial review, Colombian Constitutional Court, democracyAbstract
Judicial invalidation of constitutional amendments has garnered the attention of scholars in the last few years. Questions like whether and how a court should quash an amendment are at the forefront of contemporary comparative-constitutional-law and constitutional-theory inquiries. This excessive focus on annulment, however, has neglected some other nonconventional forms of judicial involvement regarding amendments. Taking Colombia as a case study, this article shows that the Constitutional Court has also had the power to initiate amendments, define their content, rewrite their text, and promulgate them. As these novel judicial interventions that go beyond invalidation resemble the prerogatives commonly vested on the amendment power, this research terms them ‘constitution-amending case law’, offers an in-depth exploration of them, and proposes a typology of such a jurisprudence. Lastly, the article ends with a cautionary note about the challenges this type of constitution-amending case law faces from the perspective of democracy and democratic backsliding.
References
ACKERMAN, Bruce. Constitutional Politics/Constitutional Law. The Yale Law Journal, New Haven, vol. 99, n. 3, p. 453-548, Dec. 1989.
ACOSTA, Luis Jaime. Colombian conflict victims will head to Congress after Sunday vote, Reuters, 2022 https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/colombian-conflict-victims-will-head-congress-after-sunday-vote-2022-03-11/
ALBERT, Richard. Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions. 1. Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
ALBERT, Richard. Constitutional Amendment and Dismemberment. Yale Journal of International Law, New Haven, vol. 43, n. 1, p. 1-84, [Jan./Jun.?] 2018.
ALBERT, Richard. Nonconstitutional Amendments. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, Cambridge, vol. 22, n. 1, p. 5-48, Jan./Jul. 2009.
ALBERT, Richard. The Structure of Constitutional Amendment Rules. Wake Forest Law Review, Winston-Salem, vol. 49, n. 4, p. 913-976, [Jul./Aug.?] 2014.
ALBERT, Richard; NAKASHIDZE, Malkhaz and OLCAY, Tarik. The Formalist Resistance to Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. Hastings Law Journal. San Francisco, vol. 70, n. 3, p. 639-670, Apr./May 2019.
BARAK, Aharon. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. Israel Law Review. Cambridge, vol. 44, no. 3, p. 321-341, Jun. 2011.
BASSOK, Or. The Schmitelsen Court: The Question of Legitimacy. German Law Journal, Cambridge, vol. 21, n. 2, p. 131-162, Feb./Mar. 2020.
BENITEZ-R., Vicente F. and GONZÁLEZ, Julián. In: STEINER, Christian (Ed.). Anuario de Derecho Constitucional Latinoamericano 2015. 1. Ed. Bogotá: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 2015, p. 437-478.
BERNAL, Carlos. Transitional Justice Within the Framework of a Permanent Constitution: The Case Study of the Legal Framework for Peace in Colombia. Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law. Cambridge, vol. 3, n. 4, p. 1136-1163, [Dec.?] 2014.
BERNAL, Carlos. Unconstitutional constitutional amendments in the case study of Colombia: An analysis of the justification and meaning of the constitutional replacement doctrine. International Journal of Constitutional Law, I-CON, Oxford, vol. 11, n. 2, p. 339-357, Apr./Jul. 2013.
BICKEL, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. 2. Ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.
CAJAS-SARRIA, Mario Alberto, Judicial review of constitutional amendments in Colombia: a political and historical perspective, 1955–2016. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, London, vol. 5, n. 3, p. 245-275, Dec. 2017.
CAJAS-SARRIA, Mario. Lessons from the history of courts on the review of constitutional amendments in Colombia. In: TATE, Joshua C.; DE LIMA LOPES, José Reinaldo and BOTERO-BERNAL, Andrés (Eds.). Global Legal History. A Comparative Law Perspective. 1. Ed. London: Routledge, 2019, p. 87-105.
CALDEIRA, Gregory and GIBSON, James. The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, Bloomington, vol. 36, n. 3, p. 635-664, Aug./Oct. 1992.
CEPEDA-ESPINOSA, Manuel José and LANDAU, David. Colombian Constitutional Law: Leading Cases. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
CHEUNG, Alvin. Legal Gaslighting. University of Toronto Law Journal, Toronto, vol, 72, n. 1, p. 50-80, Jan. 2022.
COLOMBIA. Decision C-141 of 2010.
COLOMBIA. Decision C-221 of 1994.
COLOMBIA. Decision C-285 of 2016.
COLOMBIA. Decision C-574 of 2011.
COLOMBIA. Decision C-579 of 2013.
COLOMBIA. Decision C-792 of 2014.
COLOMBIA. Decision SU-150 of 2021.
COLOMBIA. Gaceta del Congreso 155 of 2017.
COLOMBIA. Gaceta del Congreso 167 of 2017.
COLOMBIA. Gaceta del Congreso 238 of 2017.
COLOMBIA. Gaceta del Congreso 442 of 2017.
COLOMBIA. Gaceta del Congreso 565 of 2017.
COLOMBIA. Gaceta del Congreso 867 of 2017.
CRISAFULLI, Vezio. Lezioni di diritto costituzionale. Vol. 2. 1. Ed. Padua: CEDAM, 1984.
DIXON, Rosalind. Constitutional amendment rules: a comparative perspective. In: GINSBURG, Tom and DIXON, Rosalind (Eds.). Comparative Constitutional Law, 1. Ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011, p. 96-111.
DIXON, Rosalind. The forms, functions, and varieties of weak(ened) judicial review. International Journal of Constitutional Law, I-CON, Oxford, vol. 17, n. 3, p. 904-930, Jul./Oct. 2019.
DIXON, Rosalind and LANDAU, David. Abusive Constitutional Borrowing: Legal globalization and the subversion of liberal democracy. 1. Ed. New York. Oxford University Press, 2021.
DIXON, Rosalind and LANDAU, David. Transnational constitutionalism and a limited doctrine of unconstitutional constitutional amendment. International Journal of Constitutional Law, I-CON, Oxford, vol. 13, n. 3, p. 606-638, Jul./Oct. 2015.
DURÁN, Diana and CRUZ, David. El “fast track”: ¿un mecanismo de flexibilización de la Constitución de 1991? Revista Derecho del Estado. Bogotá, vol. 48, p. 3-29, Jan./Apr. 2018.
ELKINS, Zachary; GINSBURG, Tom and MELTON, James. The Endurance of National Constitutions. 1. Ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
FALLON, Richard H. Legitimacy and the Constitution. Harvard Law Review, Cambridge (MA), vol. 118, n. 6, p. 1787-1853, Apr./May 2005.
FULLER, Lon. The Morality of Law. 2. Ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969.
FULLER, Lon and WINSTON, Kenneth. The Forms and Limits of Adjudication. Harvard Law Review, Cambridge (MA), vol 92, n. 2, p. 353-409, Dec. 1978.
GARCÍA-JARAMILLO, Santiago and GNECCO ESTRADA, Francisco. La teoría de la sustitución: de la protección de la supremacía e integridad de la constitución, a la aniquilación de la titularidad del poder de reforma constitucional en el órgano legislativo. Vniversitas, Bogotá, vol. 65, p. 59-104, Jul./Dec. 2016.
GARGARELLA, Roberto. Latin American Constitutionalism, 1810-2010: The Engine Room of the Constitution. 1. Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
HALMAI, Gábor. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: Constitutional Courts as Guardians of the Constitution? Constellations, New York, vol. 19, n. 2, p. 182-203, Jun./Sep. 2012.
HALMAI, Gábor. The End of Liberal Constitutionalism in Hungary? Int'l J. Const. L. Blog., 2013. Available at: http://www.iconnectblog.com/2013/04/the-end-of-liberal-constitutionalism-in-hungary.
ISSACHAROFF, Samuel. Fragile Democracies: Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts. 1. Ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
ISSACHAROFF, Samuel. Courts as Guarantors of Democracy. In: LINARES, Alejandro, VALDIVIESO, Camilo and GARCÍA, Santiago (Eds.). Constitutionalism. Old Dilemmas, New Insights. 1. Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021, p. 123-135.
JIMÉNEZ-RAMÍREZ, Milton César and ARBOLEDA-RAMÍREZ, Paulo Bernardo. La sustitución de la constitución en colombia: alcances y límites. In: JIMÉNEZ-RAMÍREZ, Milton César (Ed.). El control de constitucionalidad en episodios: acerca del control constitucional como límite al poder. 1. Ed. Manizales: Sello Editorial Universidad de Caldas, 2020, p. 159-206.
KELSEN, Hans. The Nature and Development of Constitutional Adjudication. In: VINX, Lars (Ed. and Trans.) The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. 1. Ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015, p. 22-78.
KELSEN, Hans. Who Ought to be the Guardian of the Constitution. In: VINX, Lars (Ed. and Trans.) The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. 1. Ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015, p. 174-221.
KHOSLA, Madhav. Constitutional Amendment. In: CHOUDHRY, Sujit, KHOSLA, Madhav and MEHTA, Pratap Bhanu (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution, 1. Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 232-250.
LANDAU, David. Abusive Constitutionalism. U.C. Davis Law Review, Davis, vol. 47, n. 1, p. 189-260, Nov./Dec. 2013.
LANDAU, David. Political Institutions and Judicial Role in Comparative Constitutional Law. Harvard International Law Journal. Cambridge (MA), vol. 51, n. 2, p. 319-378, [Jul./Dec.?] 2010.
LANDAU, David. Presidential Term Limits in Latin America: A Critical Analysis of the Migration of the Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment Doctrine. Law & Ethics of Human Rights, Berlin, vol 12, n. 2, p. 225-249, Nov. 2018.
LANDAU, David and DIXON, Rosalind. Abusive Judicial Review: Courts against Democracy. U.C. Davis Law Review, Davis, vol. 53, n. 3, p. 1313-1388, Feb./Apr. 2020.
LANDAU, David; ROZNAI, Yaniv and DIXON, Rosalind. Term Limits and the Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment Doctrine Lessons from Latin America. In: BATURO, Alexander and ELGIE, Robert (Eds.). The Politics of Presidential Term Limits. 1. Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019 p. 53-74.
LAW, David S. A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review. Georgetown Law Journal. Washington D.C., vol. 97, n. 3, p. 723-802, Mar./Apr. 2009.
LAW, David S. Introduction: Pedagogy and Conceptualization of the Field. In: LAW, David S. (Ed.). Constitutionalism in Context, 1. Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, p. 3-22.
LAW, David S. and HSIEH, Hsiang-Yang. Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments: Taiwan. In: LAW, David S. (Ed.). Constitutionalism in Context, 1. Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, p. 185-215.
LEVINSON, Sanford. How Many Times Has the United States Constitution Been Amended? (A) < 26; (B) 26; (C) 27; (D) > 27: Accounting for Constitutional Change. In: LEVINSON, Sanford (Ed.). Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment. 1. Ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, p. 13-36.
LOEWENSTEIN, Karl. Teoría de la Constitución. 2. Ed. Barcelona: Ariel, 1976.
MATE, Manoj. Two Paths to Judicial Power: The Basic Structure Doctrine and Public Interest Litigation in Comparative Perspective. San Diego International Law Journal, San Diego, vol. 12, n. 1, p. 175-222, 2011.
NAVIA, Patricio and RÍOS-FIGUEROA, Julio. The Constitutional Adjudication Mosaic of Latin America. Comparative Political Studies. Thousand Oaks, vol. 38, n. 2, p. 189-217, Mar./Apr. 2005.
NINO, Carlos Santiago, El presidencialismo y la justificación, estabilidad y eficiencia de la democracia. Propuesta y Control, Buenos Aires, p. 39-56, 1990.
RAMÍREZ-CLEVES, Gonzalo. Límites de la reforma constitucional en Colombia: El concepto de Constitución como fundamento de la restricción. 1. Ed. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2005.
ROBLEDO-SILVA, Paula and RAMÍREZ-CLEVES, Gonzalo. La jurisprudencia constitucional colombiana en el año 2013: el control de constitucionalidad por sustitución y el amparo reforzado a los sujetos de especial protección constitucional. Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional. Madrid, vol. 18, n. 2, p. 567-620, Jul./Dec. 2014
ROZNAI, Yaniv. Constitutional Unamendability in Latin America Gone Wrong? In: ALBERT, Richard; BERNAL, Carlos and BENVINDO, Juliano Zaiden (Eds.). Constitutional Change and Transformation in Latin America. 1. Ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019, p. 93-116.
ROZNAI, Yaniv. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers. 1. Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
ROZNAI, Yaniv. Who Will Save the Redheads? Towards an Anti-Bully Theory of Judicial Review and Protection of Democracy. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Williamsburg, vol. 29, n. 2, p. 327-366, Dec. 2020.
SAJÓ, András and UITZ, Renáta. The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism. 1. Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
SATHE, S.P. Judicial activism in India. Transgressing borders and enforcing limits. 1. Ed. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2011.
SCHAPIRO, Robert A. The Legislative Injunction: A Remedy for Unconstitutional Legislative Inaction. The Yale Law Journal, New Haven, vol. 99, n. 1, p. 231-250, Oct./Nov. 1989.
SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane. Autocratic Legalism. University of Chicago Law Review, Chicago, vol. 85, n. 2, p. 545-584, Mar./May 2018.
SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane. Constitutional Coups and Judicial Review: How Transnational Institutions can Strengthen Peak Courts at Times of Crisis (With Special Reference to Hungary). Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, Iowa City, vol. 23, n. 1, p. 51-118, Jan./Jun. 2014.
TUSHNET, Mark. Alternative Forms of Judicial Review. Michigan Law Review. Ann Arbor, vol. 101, n. 8, p. 2781-2802, Aug. 2003.
U.S.A. City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997).
VERSTEEG, Mila; HORLEY, Timothy; MENG, Anne; GUIM, Mauricio and GUIRGUIS, Marilyn. The Law and Politics of Presidential Term Limit Evasion. Columbia Law Review, New York, Vol. 120, n. 1, p. 173-248, Jan. 2020.
WALDRON, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. 1. Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
WALUCHOW, Wilfrid. Constitutionalism. Stanford: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2022. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/constitutionalism/
WEINRIB, Jacob. Dimensions of Dignity. The Theory and Practice of Modern Constitutional Law. 1. Ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
WUNDER HACHEM, Daniel and PETHECHUST, Eloi. A superação das decisões do STF pelo Congresso Nacional via emendas constitucionais: diálogo forçado ou monólogos sobrepostos? Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, Curitiba, vol. 8, n. 1, p. 209-236, Jan./Apr. 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Constitutional Research the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see the Effect of Open Access).
