Rejoinder to Ayres on defense, punishment and gentleness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v9i3.86477Keywords:
punishment, defense, libertarianism, gentleness, proportionality.Abstract
Ayres maintains that both punishment after the fact of crime, and what the victim is allowed to do during the commission of the crime, should be based upon proportionality. I agree with him on the former contention, but not the latter. This paper is my attempt to make the case that the victim is entitled, based upon libertarian law, to do whatever is necessary to defend himself and his property, provided, only, that he employ the most gentle means compatible with this end. Ayres demurs.
References
AYRES, Cedric John. Proportionality trumps gentleness: reforming Block’s evictionism (part I). Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, Curitiba, vol. 8, n. 2, p. 407-433, maio/ago. 2021. DOI: 10.5380/rinc.v8i2.74518.
BLOCK, Walter E. Libertarianism vs. Objectivism; A Response to Peter Schwartz. Reason Papers, Tempe, vol. 26, p. 29-62, jun./aug. 2003. Available at: < https://reasonpapers.com/pdf/26/rp_26.pdf>.
BLOCK, Walter E. Should abortion be criminalized? Rejoinder to Akers, Davies and Shaffer on Abortion. FBIM Transactions, Belgrade, vol. 2, n. 1, p. 33-44, jan. 2014.
BLOCK, Walter E. A libertarian perspective on the stem cell debate: compromising the uncompromisable. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Oxford, vol. 35, n. 4, p. 429-448, aug. 2010. Available at: <https://academic.oup.com/jmp/issue/35/4>.
BLOCK, Walter E. A Not So Funny Thing Happened to Me in Tampa. August 30, 2012. Available at: <http://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block208.html>.
BLOCK, Walter E. Abortion, Woman and Fetus: Rights in Conflict? Reason, vol. 9, n. 12, April, p. 18-25, 1978.
BLOCK, Walter E. Evictionism and Libertarianism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Oxford, vol. 39, n. 3, p. 248-257, jun. 2014.
BLOCK, Walter E. Evictionism: The compromise solution to the pro-life pro-choice debate controversy. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2021.
BLOCK, Walter E. Forestalling, positive obligations and the Lockean and Blockian provisos: Rejoinder to Stephan Kinsella. Ekonomia Wroclaw Economic Review, Wrocław, vol. 22, n. 3, p. 27-41, 2016.
BLOCK, Walter E. Homesteading, ad coelum, owning views and forestalling. The Social Sciences, Faisalabad, vol. 3, n. 2, p. 96-103, 2008. Available at: < http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1890872>.
BLOCK, Walter E. Human shields, missiles, negative homesteading and libertarianism. Ekonomia Wroclaw Economic Review, Wrocław, vol. 25, n. 1, p. 9- 22, 2019.
BLOCK, Walter E. Judith Jarvis Thomson on abortion; a libertarian critique. DePaul Journal of Health Care Law, Chicago, vol. 19, n. 1, article n. 3, p. 1-17, mar./jun. 2017.
BLOCK, Walter E. Libertarianism, Positive Obligations and Property Abandonment: Children’s Rights. International Journal of Social Economics, Bingley, vol. 31, n. 3, p. 275-286, 2004.
BLOCK, Walter E. Response to Jakobsson on human body shields. Libertarian Papers, Auburn, vol. 2, article n. 25, p. 1-9, 2010. Availabe at: <https://cdn.mises.org/-2-25_2.pdf>.
BLOCK, Walter E. Response to Wisniewski on Abortion, Round Two. Libertarian Papers, Auburn, vol. 3, article n. 4, p. 1-13, 2011. Available at: <http://libertarianpapers.org/articles/2011/lp-3-4.pdf>.
BLOCK, Walter E. Stem Cell Research: The Libertarian Compromise. September 3, 2001. Available at: <http://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block5.html>.
BLOCK, Walter E. Terri Schiavo. Journal of Libertarian Studies, Auburn, vol. 22, n. 1, p. 527-536, 2011. Available at: <https://cdn.mises.org/22_1_26.pdf>.
BLOCK, Walter E. The Human Body Shield. Journal of Libertarian Studies, Auburn, vol. 22, n. 1, p. 625-630, 2011. Available at: <https://cdn.mises.org/22_1_30.pdf>.
BLOCK, Walter E. Toward a Libertarian Theory of Abortion. In: Rothbard, Murray N. The Libertarian Forum. Volume 2: 1976-1984. Auburn: Mises Institute, 2006 [1977]. Available at: <http://www.mises.org/journals/lf/1977/1977_09.pdf >.
BLOCK, Walter E. Toward a libertarian theory of evictionism. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, vol 35, n. 2, p. 290-294, jun. 2014.
BLOCK, Walter E. Van Dun on Freedom and Property: A Critique. Libertarian Papers, Auburn, vol. 2, n. 4, 2010.
BLOCK, Walter E.; EPSTEIN, Richard. Debate on Eminent Domain. NYU Journal of Law & Liberty, New York, vol. 1, n. 3, pp. 1144-1169, 2005. Available at: <https://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/ECM_PRO_060927.pdf>.
BLOCK, Walter E.; WHITEHEAD, Roy. Compromising the Uncompromisable: A Private Property Rights Approach to Resolving the Abortion Controversy. Appalachian Law Review, vol. 4, n. 2, p. 1-45, 2005.
DYKE, Jeremiah; BLOCK, Walter E. Explorations in Property Rights: Conjoined Twins. Libertarian Papers, Auburn, vol. 3, article n. 38, p. 1-18, 2011. Available at: <http://libertarianpapers.org/38-explorations-property-rights-conjoined-twins/>.
HAZLITT, Henry. Economics in One Lesson. Auburn: Mises Institute, 2008 [1946]. Available at: <http://mises.org/books/economics_in_one_lesson_hazlitt.pdf>.
ROTHBARD, Murray N. The Ethics of Liberty. New York: New York University Press, 1998 [1982]. Available at: <https://cdn.mises.org/The%20Ethics%20of%20Liberty%2020191108.pdf>.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Constitutional Research the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see the Effect of Open Access).