Materialidade em auditoria: Os contextos que impactam subjetivamente no julgamento de auditores independentes
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDF |25-54|Referências
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA, 2002). Statement on auditing standards no. 99: Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA, 2006). AU section 312: Audit risk and materiality in conducting an audit.
Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3-37.
Bates, H. L., Ingram, R. W., & Reckers, P. M. J. (1982). Auditor-client affiliation: The impact on “materiality”. Journal of Accountancy, 153(4), 60–63.
Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling. Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141-163.
Borba, J. A. (2001). A lógica nebulosa (fuzzy logic) aplicada na contabilidade: um modelo para os julgamentos de materialidade no planejamento da auditoria (Tese (Doutorado). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. Recuperado de https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/12/12136/tde-30052023-114238/publico/DrJoseAlonsoBorba.pdf
Boyle, D. M., DeZoort, F. T., & Harmanson, D. R. (2015). The effects of internal audit report type and reporting relationship on internal auditor’s risk judgements. Accounting Horizons, 29(3), 695-718.
Boynton, W. C., Johnson, R. N., & Kell, W. G. (2002). Auditoria. São Paulo, Brasil: Editora Atlas.
Brasel, K., Doxey, M. M., Grenier, J. H., & Reffett, A. (2016). Risk disclosure preceding negative outcomes: The effects of reporting critical audit matters on judgements of auditor liability. Current Issues in Auditing, 10(2), 1-10.
Brown, J. O. & Popova, V. K. (2016). The Interplay of Management Incentives and Audit Committee Communication on Auditor Judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 28 (1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51259
Camargo, R.C.C.P. (2018). Relevância da divulgação de critérios de materialidade da auditoria nas decisões de investidores. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro Sócio-Econômico, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Contabilidade, Florianópolis, 2018. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/193325
Carpenter, B. W., Dirsmith, M. W., & Gupta, P. P. (1994). Materiality judgements and audit firm culture: Social-behavioral and political perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19 (4/5), 355-380.
Carvalho Junior, C. V. O. (2012). Neuroaccounting: mapeamento cognitivo cerebral em julgamentos de continuidade operacional. (Tese de doutorado, USP) Brasil.
CFC (2009 a-k) Conselho Federal de Contabilidade. Disponível https://cfc.org.br/2009/ 20/09/2019.
CFC (2011). Conselho Federal de Contabilidade, Estrutura Conceitual de Contabilidade. Disponível http://www.normaslegais.com.br/legislacao/resolucao-cfc-1374-2011.htm 20/08/2019.
CFC (2014). Conselho Federal de Contabilidade. Disponível https://cfc.org.br/2014. 20/09/2019.
Christensen, B. E., Eilifsen, A., Glover, S. M. & Messer, W. F. (2020). The effect of audit materiality disclosures on investors’ decision making. Accounting, Organization and Society, 87(1), 101168.
Dos Santos, L. D., & Do Amaral, L. A. M. (2004). Estudos Delphi com q-sort sobre a web: A sua utilização em sistemas de informação. In 5a Conferência da Associação Portuguesa de Sistemas de Informação [CD] Lisboa: Instituto Superior Técnico.
Edgley, C, Michael J. J, & Atkinsc, J. (2015) The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: A field study approach. The British Accounting Review, 47(1), 1-18.
El-dash, L. G., & Scaleante, O. A. F. (2005). Atitudes de frequentadores de cavernas: Um estudo utilizando metodologia Q. Artigo apresentado no 28o Congresso Brasileiro de Espeleologia, p.18-23.
Estes, R., & Reames, D. D. (1988). Effects of a personal characteristics on materiality decisions: A multivariate analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 18(72), 291-296.
Flint, D. (1988). Philosophy and principles of auditing: An introduction. New York, USA: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
Financial Reporting Council (2016). Extended auditor’s reports: A further review of experience.
Friedberg, A. H., Strawser, J. R., & Cassidy, J. H. (1989). Factors affecting materiality judgements: A comparison of “big eight” accounting firms’ materiality views with the results of empirical research. Advances in Accounting, 7(1), 187-201.
Gephart, R. (2004). Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 454-462.
Gil, A. C. (2007). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social (5a ed.). São Paulo, Brasil: Editora Atlas.
Gimbar, C., Hansen, B., & Ozlanski, M. E. (2016a). Early evidence on the effects of critical audit matters on auditor liability. Current Issues in Auditing, 10(1), A24-A33. doi: 10.2308/ciia-51369
Gimbar, C., Hansen, B., & Ozlanski, M. E. (2016b). The effects of critical audit matter paragraphs and accounting standard precision on auditor liablity. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1629-1646. doi: 10.2308/accr-51382
Harvard University. (2017). Risk management and audit services: How long will my audit take? Recuperado de: https://rmas.fad.harvard.edu/faq/how-long-will-my-audit-take
Hazari, S. (2005). Perceptions of end-users on the requirements in personal firewall software: An exploratory study. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 17(3), 47-65. doi: 10.4018/joeuc.2005070103
Howard, R. (1989). Judgement, decision and choice: A cognitive/behavioral synthesis. Salem, OH: W. H. Friedman.
IASB (2010). International Accounting Standards Board. Disponível https://www.ifrs.org/groups/international-accounting-standards-board/ 25/04/2019
IASB (2015). International Accounting Standards Board. Disponível https://www.ifrs.org/groups/international-accounting-standards-board/ 25/04/2019
IASB (2017). International Accounting Standards Board. Disponível https://www.ifrs.org/groups/international-accounting-standards-board/ 25/05/2019
Imoniana, J. O., & Gartner, I. R. (2016). Critical remark on multi-criteria approach to corporate auditing risk assessment-evidence from Brazil. International Journal of Auditing Technology, 3 (2), 128-149.
Imoniana, J. O. (2019). Auditoria: Planejamento, execução e reporte. São Paulo: Atlas.
Instituto dos Auditores Independentes do Brasil (IBRACON, 2006). Auditoria: Registros de uma profissão. Disponível em: http://www.ibracon.com.br/ibracon/
Jacob, J., & Levy, H. B. (2016). The materiality mystery. The CPA Journal, 86(7), 14-18.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Johnson, P. E., Jamal, K., & Berryman, R. G. (1989). Audit judgment research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14(1-2), 83–99.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292. doi: 10.2307/1914185
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683
King, N. (2004), Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (Eds), Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research (Chap. 3, pp. 256-270). London: Sage Publications.
Kozbelt, A. (2011), In Encyclopedia of Creativity (Second Edition),
Knechel, W. R. (2016). Audit quality and regulation. International Journal of Auditing, 20(3), 215-223. doi: 10.1111/iaju.12077
Lee, S. K. J., & Yu, K. (2004). Corporate culture and organizational performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(4), 340-359. doi: 10.11083940410537927
Lesage, C., & Wechtler, H. (2007). Typology of research topics in audit: A content analysis. Paper presented at 30th European Accounting Association Annual Congress.
Leitão, J. M. & Dantas, J. A. (2016). Materiality in Public Sector Financial Audit: International Practice and the Opinion of Brazilian Experts. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 19(1), 146-166.
Lesage, C., & Wechtler, H. (2010). An Inductive Typology of Auditing Research. (SSRN Working Paper). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1173054
Llewellyn, S. (1999). Narratives in accounting and management research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), pp. 220-237.
Lusk, E. J., & Halperin, M. (2016). Client risk calibration in PCAOB audits: An analytical procedures panel risk assignment protocol. International Journal of Auditing Technology, 3(1), 1-21.
Maijoor, S. J., Meuwissen, R. H. G., & Quadackers, L. M. (2000). The effects of national institutions on audit research: Evidence from europe and north-america. European Accounting Review, 9(4), 569-587.
Martinov, N., & Roebuck, P. (1998). The assessment and integration of materiality and inherent risk: An analysis of major firms’ audit practices. International Journal of Auditing, 2(2), 103-216. doi: 10.1111/1099-1123.00034
Maypear, A. G. (1982). Consensus of auditors’ materiality judgement of internal accounting control weakness. Journal of Accounting Research, 20(2), 773-783.
Maypear, A. G., Doucet, M. S., & Warren, C. S. (1989). Auditor’s materiality judgements of internal acconting control weakness. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(1), 72–86.
McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, nº 66). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Messier Jr., W. F., Martinov-Bennie, N., & Eilifsen, A. (2005). A review and integration of empirical research on materiality: Two decades later. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 24(2), 153-187.
Myers, D. G. (2012). Psicologia (9a ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Editora LTC.
Nelson, M. W., Elliott, J. a, Tarpley, R. L., & Gibbins, M. (2002). Evidence from auditors about managers’ and auditors' earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review, 77(Supplement), 175–202. doi: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.175
Nelson, M. W., & Kinney Jr, W. R. (1997). the effect of ambiguity on loss contingency reporting judgments. The Accounting Review. 72(2), 257–274.
Nelson, M. W., Smith, S. D., Palmrose, Z., & Smith, S. D. (2005). Materiality approach on auditors’ adjustment decisions. The Accounting Review. 80(3), 897–920.
Ng, T. B.; & Tan, H. T. (2003). Effects of authoritative guidance availability and audit committee effectiveness on auditors' judgments in an auditor‐client negotiation context. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 801-818. doi: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.801
Pagnussatt, D. (2016). A percepção dos stakeholders locais sobre os impactos econômicos, sociais e ambientais de pequenas centrais hidroelétricas (Dissertação de mestrado, Pontifícia Univ. Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil).
Polit, D. F., & Hungler, B. P. (1987). Nursing research: Principles and methods (3rd. ed.). Philadelphia, United States: J. B. Lippincott.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB, 2015). Improving the transparency of audits: Rules to require disclosure of certain audit participants on a new pcaob form and related amendments to auditing standards.
Raadgever, G. T., Mostert, E., & Van de Giesen, N. C. (2008). Identification of stakeholder perspectives on future flood management in the Rhine basin using Q methodology. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12(4), 1097-1109.
Rosenbaum, M. S., Ostrom, A. L., & Kuntze, R. (2005). Loyalty programs and a sense of community. The Journal of Services Marketing, 9(4), 222-234.
Sandberg, M., & Holmlund, M. (2015). Impression management tactics in sustainability reporting. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 677-689.
Santos, M. (2003). Por uma outra globalização: Do pensamento único à consciência universal. São Paulo, Brasil. Editora Record.
Santos, I. M. M., & Santos, R. S. (2008). A etapa de análise no método história de vida: Uma experiência de pesquisadores de enfermagem. Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem, 17(4), 714-719.
Sartorelli, I. C. (2015). Análise do padrão decisório do auditor brasileiro com uso da Metodologia Q e do DMI (Decision Making Inventory) (Tese de doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil). doi: 10.11606/T.12.2015.
Smith, S. D.; Tayler, W. B.; & Prawitt, D. F. (2016). The effect of information choice on auditors’ judgements and confidence. Accounting Horizons, 30(3), 393-408.
Souza, L. A. A. S.; Dyniewicz, A. M.; & Kalinowski, L. C. (2010). Auditoria: Uma abordagem histórica e atual. Revista de Administração em Saúde, 12(47), 71-78.
Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Stephenson, W. (1968). Consciousness out – subjectivity in. The Psychological Record, 11 (1), 499-501.
SUSEP (2020). Superintendência de Seguros Privados. Circular SUSEP n.º 616 https://www2.susep.gov.br/safe/bnportal/internet/pt-BR/search/48516?exp=517%2Fnumero%20%22CIRCULAR%20SUSEP%22%2Fdis
Theodorson, G. A., & Theodorson, A. G. (1970). A modern dictionary of sociology. New York, United States: Ty Crowell Co.
Thomas, D. M., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Q-sorting and MIS research: A primer. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 8(1), 141-156. Disponível em: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol8/iss1/9/
Tomei, P. A., Russo, G. M. (2013). Práticas metodológicas em administração: O caso da utilização da metodologia Q como ferramenta para pesquisa e diagnóstico da cultura organizacional. Revista Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 14(1), 9-37.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (2014). A practical guide to oral history. Recuperado de http://sohp.org/files/2013/11/A-Practical-Guide-to-Oral-History_march2014.pdf
Valenta, A. L., & Wigger, U. (1997). Q-methodology: Definition and application in health care informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4(6), 501-510.
Vance, D. E. (2011). A meta-analysis of empirical materiality studies. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 27(5). doi: 10.19030/jabr.v27i5.5592
Venables, D., Pidgeon, N., Simmons, P., Henwood, K., & Parkhill, K. (2009). Living with nuclear power: A q-method study of local community perceptions. Risk Analysis, 29(8), 1089-1104.
Waters II, J. M; & Tiller, M. G. (1997). Auditors' materiality thresholds: Some empirical findings based on real data. American Business Review. 15(2), 115-119.
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q Methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Webler, T., Danielson, S., & Tuler, S. (2009). Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Greenfield, MA, USA: Social and Environmental Research Institute.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rcc.v15i2.85828
