Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The manuscript is original and has not been published, nor is it under consideration for publication, by another journal.
  • The manuscript meets all the requirements described in the Instructions for Authors.

  • The manuscript is in accordance with the Ethics Code and Publication Best Practices.

Author Guidelines

1. Revista de Economia publishes exclusively original studies that are not currently under review in another journal. The journal welcomes manuscripts written on either Portuguese, English, or Spanish.

2. File settings: Microsoft Word format, A4 paper, 3.0 margins (top, bottom, left, and right), Times New Roman 13 font, 1.3 spacing, and maximum 10,000 words, including annexes and references.

3. Manuscripts should present title, abstract with no more than 250 words, keywords, and JEL Classification.

4. Complete references must be presented at the end of the text, in alphabetical order, and in accordance with the ABNT NBR 6023/2018 standard.

Books: LAST NAME, F. N. Title of the book. Place: editor, year.
Articles: LAST NAME, F. N. Title of the article. Journal, v. X, n. Y, year.

5. Mathematical formulae must be numbered sequentially. This is also true for illustrations (tables, charts, graphs), which must also present title and source.

6. Manuscripts must not contain any sort of author identification. The names of the authors must be deleted from the Word file (File à Information à Properties à Author).

7. Articles are accepted with a maximum of 4 (four) authors, who must have participated effectively in the development of the paper. The authors must also have ORCID registrations. Once issued the first editorial decision, the inclusion of new co-authors is no longer allowed.

8. Authors (and coauthors) with articles under evaluation are not allowed to submit a new manuscript until a final editorial decision has been issued.

9. The review process undergoes two distinct stages: (1) internal evaluation, in which the originality, relevance, and the academic interest of the manuscript are observed; and (2) blind review by peers with expertise on the manuscript’s subject.

10. Manuscripts that do not meet these conditions, as well as the rules presented in the Ethics Code and Best Publication Practices, will not advance to the peer review stage.